नमस्कारः, अहं संस्कृतभाषायाः विकिपीडियस्य (विकिपीडियायाः वा) नवीनसदस्योऽस्मि, परं अनेन सह मम परिचयः पुरातनः। समयाभावात् अहं अत्र प्रभूतयोगदानं कर्तुम् न शक्तोऽस्मि।
परंतु मम विनम्रतायुतं अवलोकनं अस्ति यत् संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाः दशा अतीव शोचनीया वर्तते। लेखानां गुणवत्ताऽपि नास्ति। तथा च संस्कृतभाषायाः स्तरोऽपि अतिनिम्नः। एषा स्थितिः संतोषप्रदा नास्ति। व्याकरणस्य सामान्यनियमाः अपि न पालिताः इति दृश्यते। (मम एषा सद्भावनायुता टिप्पणी अन्यथा न गृहीतव्या) मुखपृष्ठस्य भाषायामपि अशुद्ध्यः सन्ति (यथा - व्यासपिठ न तु व्यासपीठम्, दान न तु दानं, आज्ञार्थस्थाने लट्लकारस्य प्रयोगः, इत्याद्यः केवलाः लघुतमाः अशुद्ध्यः उद्धरामि)। अहं तु ताः शोधयितुं न शक्नोमि यतो हि तत्पृष्ठं यंत्रितं (सुरक्षितं) अस्ति।
यदि संबद्धः प्रबंधक-महोदयः (एडमिनिस्ट्रेटर्-महोदयः) अनुज्ञां ददाति तदा अहं तं शोधयितुं शक्नोमि। यद्यपि अहमपि परमविद्वान् नास्मि तथापि एतावतीं संस्कृतभाषां जानामि। यद्यपि ये केऽपि अत्र पूर्वेऽपि प्रयासं कुर्वाणः सन्ति तेषां प्रयासाः निस्संदेहं साधुवादार्हाः। -- धन्यवादः
after some 50 edits or so here also you can take adminship yourself not a problem.
Thanks for your valuable and timely support to sanskrit wikipedia. Mahitgar १६:३७, १० ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
Dear Sir,
First of all, thanks for the response. And also thanks for not taking my statements otherwise. I will try out your valuable suggestions. Also I want to add that gammatical errors should not stop us to contribute to Wikipedia (I have read in some Wikipedia page that editing is encouraged whether language is perfect or not). Only thing which made me think was that the front page and other presentation related pages should be as perfect as possible, so that they should give a sound launch-pad for further navigation and editing. For other articles it is not a big issue and those can be refined with time. In fact, in my school days, my Sanskrit teacher used to tell that it is a big hurdle in popularization of Sanskrit that people want to start using Sanskrit only when they will become perfect in it, but perfection is not possible without using.
The contribution you are giving to Sanskrit and Marathi Wikipedia is really praiseworthy. Also, I will ask again if I have some problem. --Thanks and Regards.
--Hemant wikikosh ०७:२३, ११ ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
No body sir over here, How about following sanskrit tradition of भवदीय:
Thanks and Regards Mahitgar १३:५८, ११ ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
प्रिय महोदय,
मया तत्र विकिट्रांस् इत्यस्मिन् अनुज्ञार्थम् अनुरोधः (रिक्वेस्ट्) प्रेषितः अस्ति. तत्रतः उत्तरं प्रतीक्षिष्ये. अपि च, मया तत्र विकिपीडिया-लॉगिन्-नामतः भिन्नं नाम प्रयुक्तं - किं तेन किंचित् समस्या भविष्यति? अथवा उभे भिन्ने भवितुं शक्नुवन्तः? --Hemant wikikosh ०९:५०, १२ ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
If you want to merge two different user accounts owned and remember password for all you accounts you can request merger of two accounts but merger is not compulsory. Here you can see my account on translate wiki
Secondly please add {{#Babel:hi-3|sa-3|en-3}} on your user page at translate wiki.
Thanks and regards Mahitgar १४:५०, १२ ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
महोदय, भवतः सहाय्येन कार्यं सिद्धम्. परन्तु वस्तुतः अधुना आरभ्यते कार्यम्.अहम् इदानीम् केचित् प्रयोगात्मकानि परिवर्तनानि कृतवान् अस्मि. तेषां प्रभावान् समीक्षिष्ये. अपि च अहम् केचित् दिवसार्थं स्व-संगणकात् दूरम् अस्मि, (कार्यार्थम्), अतः तत्पश्चादेव पूर्णक्षमतया लेखितुम् शक्ष्यामि. - धन्यवादाः --Hemant wikikosh १३:०८, १३ ज्येष्ठाषाढके २००९ (UTC)
नमस्कारः माहितगारवर्य तथा च सर्वे उपयोजकाः,
अभिनन्दनानि। ट्रान्सलेट्विकि इत्यस्मिन् कृतानि परिवर्तनानि अद्य बहुकालप्रतीक्षापश्चात् संस्कृतविकिपीडियायां प्रतिबिम्बितानि सन्ति। -Hemant wikikosh ०६:५९, १७ सेप्टेम्बरमासः २००९ (UTC)
Following template is visible on each user's talk-page, which has some serious grammatical errors, I am pointing out them please correct (let's take my username as parameter) (each line is followed by corrected version and then explaination of correction):
एष यॊजक Hemant wikikoshस्य सम्भाषण-पृष्ठं, भवान् अत्र यॊजकाय सन्देशानि दत्तुं शक्नॊति
एतत् योजकस्य Hemant wikikosh इत्येतस्य सम्भाषण-पृष्ठम्। भवान् अत्र योजकार्थं सन्देशान् दातुं शक्नोति
पुरातन पाठस्य अधोतले नूतना पाठानि स्थाप्यताम्। नूतन शीर्षकं आरभ्यतु।
पूर्वतनस्य पाठस्य अधस्तात् नूतनः पाठः स्थाप्यताम्। नूतनं शीर्षकम् आरभताम्। : अधोतले means अधः and तले are wrongly joined. नूतना पाठानि means पाठ has ambiguous gender.
हस्ताक्षर तथा मिति प्रदर्शनार्थॆ चत्वारो टिल्ड (~~~~) टंकणं करोतु।
हस्ताक्षरान् तथा च दिनाङ्कं प्रदर्शयितुं चतुर्वारं टिल्ड् (~~~~) इत्येतेषां टङ्कणं करोतु। :हस्ताक्षर is not inflected at all in above text. celebrated error of थॆ instead of थे also present.
भवान् विकिपीडिया स्थले नवीन? स्वागतम् !
किं भवान् विकिपीडियायां नवीनोऽसि? स्वागतमत्र ! :original text means- "O newcomer! Are you on wikipedia site?" while we want to say- "Are you newcomer on wikipedia site."
सभ्यं भवतु
सभ्यो भवतु। :Rest are self-explanatory. Also I've used पूर्णविराम punctuation to mark the completeness of sentences.
पूर्वाग्रहं नैव गृह्यताम्
पूर्वाग्रहं नैव गृह्यताम्।
व्यक्तिगत-आक्षेप नैव सृज्यताम्
व्यक्तिगतान् आक्षेपान् नैव सृज्यताम्।
नवागन्तुकानां सदा सुस्वागतं करोतु
नवागन्तुकानां सदा सुस्वागतं करोतु।
Administrator(s) are requested to kindly correct it as soon as possible. Thanks and regards. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०५:४८, २४ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
Yeah, it's nice, except for one mistake on my account- it should've been "किं भवान् विकिपीडियायां नवीनोऽस्ति?" rather than "नवीनोऽसि". धन्यवादः स्वरूपवर्य। -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १०:५४, २४ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
यत् परिवर्तनम् आनीतं तत् बहु समीचीनमेव । धन्यवादाः । अहं द्वित्रान् अंशान् सूचयितुम् इच्छामि । कृपया विचिन्त्य अङ्गीक्रियताम् ।
I want to draw attention of our capable editors to the point that some of us are using कश्चन or कश्चित् in place of एकः, in the opening sentence of articles, which is wrong. First I'll show such usages-
स्थम्भकरिः धान्यविशेषः कश्चन अस्ति ।
कैंटोनीनाम काचित् भाषा अस्ति।
ओरिस्साराज्यॆ स्थितं किञ्चन मण्डलम् ।
Now fact is that एकः is an article while कश्चन कश्चित् are existential determiners; certainly their roles are different. एकः can be used as an indefinite article whose role is:
“ | An indefinite article indicates that its noun is not a particular one (or ones) identifiable to the listener. *It may be something that the speaker is mentioning for the first time*, or its precise identity may be irrelevant or hypothetical, or the speaker may be making a general statement about any such thing. | ” |
-from en.wikipedia
Now this definition (coincidentally) holds for Sanskrit also. Particularly we are using the highlighted part above as the role of एकः. Now existential article कश्चन= (can be called as)anysoever कश्चित् जनः= some person. So if we say कैंटोनीनाम काचित् भाषा अस्ति। this is though a valid sentence, but not for wikipedia article, its (काचित्) tone is uncertainity, i.e. cantonese is some language (We certainly never see such usage on en.wiki where 'a language' would be found). We can use such statements in casual talking but not in an trustable informative article, where we should use कैंटोनी नाम एका भाषाऽस्ति।, so that reader be convinced that the writer (ie Wikipedia) knows with surity. So I request our editors to please use एकः,एका,एकम् and their forms in the said context rather than कश्चित् or कश्चन. If our respected editors have any doubt/comment in this regard, please express. Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०७:०१, २७ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
अस्मिन् विषये प्राज्ञैः सह मया चर्चा कृता । तैः दत्तम् उत्तरम् अधः लिखन्ती अस्मि ।
As I understand चित् and चन are particles added to the forms of किम् शब्द and the forms thus got are called निपाताः in Samskrit. They are used in place of articles 'the' and 'a' of English language. The word एका is a cardinal (संख्यावाचक) primarily and it denotes the number 'one'. However, it has other senses like 'alone', 'same', 'supreme', 'peerless', 'only'. It is also used in place of the articles 'a' and 'an' of English. For eg., "स्त्रीसंस्थानमेकं ज्योतिः आराद् एनाम् उत्क्षिप्य अप्सरास्तीर्थं जगाम" - शाकुन्तलम् 5-30. It is certainly not a substitute for the articles of English. But, more commonly the forms with चित् and चन are used in place of articles of English. Let us take the examples quoted here. स्थम्भकरी एकः/कश्चन धान्यविशेषः Here the speaker wants to say that there is a kind of grain called स्थम्भकरी. The listener has no knowledge of what the grain is like. He is hearing the name for the first time. He is being told that the name refers to a kind of grain. The singular usage of the two words convey the एकत्व संख्या. Hence there is no need for the word एका there. Nor is there any need for the word काचन because, the speaker knows what he is referring to. For the listener the word धान्यविशेषः would suffice to convey that it is a kind of grain. So, for better clarity the speaker may add नाम instead of एकः or कश्चन. In which case the sentence would be स्थम्भकरी नाम धान्यविशेषः (अस्ति) The sentences कैंटोनीनाम काचित् भाषा अस्ति and ओरिस्साराज्यॆ स्थितं किञ्चन मण्डलम् do convey the intended sense and are grammatically also correct. In both the sentences the singular number of the subject is conveyed by the एकवचनम् itself. By using the word एका in place of काचित् and किञ्चन the speaker may be suggesting that there is no other language but this and no other district but this, which is not the intended meaning. So, it is more appropriate to use the words काचित्, किञ्चन in place of indefinite articles than eka. As regards the view that the definition of an 'article' of English holds good for Samskrit also, we would like to point out that the two languages are so totally different and their grammar very unlike each other. While translating sentences from one language to another we need to safeguard the dignity and style of the language. The parts of speech of English do not necessarily correspond to those of Samskrit. Structurally Samskrit is very different from English. The suffixes are glued to words permanently. Hence the jumbling up of words in any sentence does not cause any change in meaning. But that is not so with English. Therefore, while translating sentences from English to Samskrit we only try to convey the puport and do not necessarily do word for word translation. In view of all these points, we feel that there is nothing wrong with the sentences स्थम्भकरिः कश्चन धान्यविशेषः अस्ति । कैंटोनीनाम काचित् भाषा अस्ति। ओरिस्साराज्यॆ स्थितं किञ्चन मण्डलम् ।
पंचतन्त्रे विद्यमानानि द्वित्राणि उदाहरणानि -
I tried to change 'grammatically incorrect' name of an article to correct one but was not able to do so. If somebody knows please tell me how can I do so. Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १७:३४, ३१ जूलय् २०११ (UTC)
Scholarship विषये मुखपुटे या सूचना संस्कृतेन लिखिता अस्ति सा दोषयुक्ता अस्ति। कृपया अधः यथा लिखितं तथा परिवर्त्यताम्।
सर्वेभ्यः नमस्कारः । लेखानां वर्गीकरणकार्यं प्रचलदस्ति इति भवन्तः जानन्ति एव । तत्सम्बद्धः कश्चन प्रश्नः विद्यते ।
सर्वेऽपि वर्गाः कस्मिंश्चित् मूलस्थाने संयोजनीयाः सन्ति । तन्नाम यथा आङ्ग्लभाषाविकिपीडियायां Contents इत्यत्र विकिपीडियायां विद्यमानाः सर्वेऽपि वर्गाः तद्द्वारा सर्वेऽपि विद्यमानाः विषयाः दृश्यन्ते तथा संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाम् अग्रे व्यवस्था करणीया अस्ति । तन्निमित्तं समीचीनः अर्थपूर्णः शब्दः तु अधुना एव निश्चेतव्यः अस्ति कार्यदृष्ट्या । अयं शब्दः कः भवतु ? विषयसर्वस्वम् / समग्रविषयाः / अन्तर्विषयाः / आन्तर्यम् .......... अथवा अन्यः कश्चन उत्तमः शब्दः भवितुमर्हति । अस्मिन् विषये भवताम् अभिप्रायं कृपया सूचयन्तु इति प्रार्थये । शुभा (चर्चा) ०८:५३, १२ दशम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
I too support the word विषयसर्वस्वम्. As Hemant rightly says, that seems to be the most apt one among all those are presented here. Viswaprabha (चर्चा) १०:३४, १३ दशम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
योजकः:Guruguhadasa - वैज्ञानिकशब्दानाम् अर्थं लिखन् अस्ति विकिपीडियायाः पृष्ठेषु । किमिदम् अत्र उचितम् ? इत्येतस्य उत्तरं न मया प्राप्तम् । भवद्भिः किं चिन्त्यते ? शुभा (चर्चा) ११:२८, ४ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
शुभा +1 Viswaprabha (चर्चा) २२:५३, ४ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
Please refer A, B etc.
Please avoid creating articles with titles like A,B,C,D,E etc... Although the contents of such articles are much appreciated, it will be much better if one could make them under one long list and a common title. For eg: Technical terninology or Scientific vocabulory etc. (whichever is more apt for the contents). Viswaprabha (चर्चा) ०८:०२, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
सर्वान् प्रणमामि ।
Five pillars of Wikipedia इत्येतस्य भावानुवादः अत्र ([[१]]) योजितः अस्ति । कृपया दृश्यताम् । विकिपीडियायाम् अस्य योजनात् पूर्वम् अस्मिन् विषये भवताम् अभिप्रायं ज्ञातुम् इच्छामि - संस्कृतविकिपीडियायाः पोषणदृष्ट्या अस्मिन् परिष्कारः अपेक्ष्यते वा ? कृपया सूच्यताम् । - शुभा (चर्चा) १०:५४, १७ फ़ेब्रुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
तन्त्रविषयकानां एतेषां शब्दानां संस्कृतशब्दाः के स्युः? तेषाञ्च शब्दानां मूलं किम् अस्ति, प्रयोजनाय कः तर्कः अस्ति इति अत्र अस्माभिः योजितव्यम्। एषा सूची कार्ये प्रयोजनकारिणी स्याद् इति मत्या अत्र निर्मीयते। सर्वैरपि भवद्भिः नूतनान् शब्दान् विचिन्त्य अत्र लेखितव्यम् इति निवेदनम्। -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०९:२०, २४ सप्तम्बर् २०१२ (UTC)
आंग्लभाषायां शब्दः (In English) | एतत् किं भवति? | संस्कृते (किं स्याद् इति) | संस्कृते मूलप्रयोगस्य आङ्ग्लभाषया अर्थः | प्रयोगपक्षे तर्कः विचारः वा |
---|---|---|---|---|
Window | तन्त्रांशस्य दर्श्यमानं क्षेत्रम् | गवाक्षः | Window (in a house etc.) | एतत् सरलः प्रयोगः, यथातथं चास्ति। |
Button | यथा 'पृष्ठं रक्ष्यताम्' इति। | |||
Textbox | यस्मिन् भवता लिख्यते तत् क्षेत्रम् |
|
| |
To click | सङ्गणके एकः आदेशप्रकारः | तुदनम्/तुदतु । | ||
Tab | यथा प्रत्येकस्य पृष्ठस्योपरि - 'पठ्यताम्', 'सम्पाद्यताम्' इति। | |||
I have introduced a small modification in Narayam tool as per spirit of this message by me. By applying this change, e will produce ए and similarly matra; o will produce ओ and similarly matra. This is contrary to previous use of E and O respectively. This may give a relief to users of the tool, because I am seeing that every new user is entering ऎ ऒ etc. due to counter-intuitive scheme existing.
Please copy and paste following code (everything in following box, after clicking 'दर्शनम्') to a page named: user:YOUR_USER_NAME/common.js this will automatically change ur typing scheme slightly. Now start typing using e and o (no need to press shift for such a frequent letter and maatraa namely ए and ओ).
At first u will feel some problem due to habit, after that small time is passed, whatever experience you have will be feedback for me. Please inform frankly whatever problem u have with this change, so that I may finalize this after needed modifications.
Modified Narayam Scheme |
---|
mw.loader.using('ext.narayam.rules.sa', function () { /* * mw.loader ensures that the required JavaScript is loaded (and only once) * before the rest of the customization code is executed. * If you want to do customization on an input method, find out the resource * loader module name corresponding to that from Narayam.php. * This example uses Malayalam transliteration. */ var sa_scheme = $.narayam.getScheme( 'sa' ); //Rules changed as per users' convenience. var custom_rules = [ ['क्h','c','च्'], ['\\\\([A-Za-z\\>_~\\.0-9])','\\\\','$1'], ['([क-ह]़?)्a', '','$1'], ['([क-ह]़?)्A', '','$1ा'], ['([क-ह]़?)a', '','$1ा'], ['([क-ह]़?)्i', '','$1ि'], ['([क-ह]़?)(्I|िi|ेe)', '','$1ी'], ['([क-ह]़?)्u', '','$1ु'], ['([क-ह]़?)(ुu|्U|ोo)', '','$1ू'], ['([क-ह]़?)्R', '','$1ृ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृR', '','$1ॄ'], ['([क-ह]़?)्ळ्l', '','$1ॢ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ॢl', '','$1ॣ'], ['([क-ह]़?)े\\^', '','$1ॅ'], ['([क-ह]़?)्E', '','$1ॆ'], ['([क-ह]़?)्e', '','$1े'], ['([क-ह]़?)ो\\^', '','$1ॉ'], ['([क-ह]़?)i', '','$1ै'], ['([क-ह]़?)्O', '','$1ॊ'], ['([क-ह]़?)्o', '','$1ो'], ['([क-ह]़?)u', '','$1ौ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृa', '','$1्ऱ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृA', '','$1्ऱा'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृi', '','$1्ऱि'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृI', '','$1्ऱी'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृu', '','$1्ऱु'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृU', '','$1्ऱू'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृ\\^', '','$1्ऱॅ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृE', '','$1्ऱॆ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृe', '','$1्ऱे'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृO', '','$1्ऱॊ'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृo', '','$1्ऱो'], ['([क-ह]़?)ृ\\~', '','$1्ऱ्'], ['([क-ह])्\\`', '','$1़्'], ['अa', '','आ'], ['(ओo|उu)', '','ऊ'], ['ए\\^', '','ऍ'], ['अi', '','ऐ'], ['अ\\^', '','ॲ'], ['(इi|एe)', '','ई'], ['ओ\\^', '','ऑ'], ['अu', '','औ'], ['ऋR', '','ॠ'], ['ळ्l', '','ऌ'], ['ऌl', '','ॡ'], ['ं\\^', '','ँ'], ['ंm', '','ँ'], ['ओM', '','ॐ'], ['क्h', '','ख्'], ['ग्h', '','घ्'], ['न्g', '','ङ्'], ['च्h', '','छ्'], ['ज्h', '','झ्'], ['न्j', '','ञ्'], ['ट्h', '','ठ्'], ['ड्h', '','ढ्'], ['त्h', '','थ्'], ['द्h', '','ध्'], ['प्h', '','फ्'], ['ब्h', '','भ्'], ['ऋa', '','ऱ'], ['ऋA', '','ऱा'], ['ऋi', '','ऱि'], ['ऋI', '','ऱी'], ['ऋu', '','ऱु'], ['ऋU', '','ऱू'], ['ऋ\\^', '','ऱॅ'], ['ऋE', '','ऱॆ'], ['ऋe', '','ऱे'], ['ऋO', '','ऱॊ'], ['ऋo', '','ऱो'], ['ऋ\\~', '','ऱ्'], ['स्h', '','ष्'], ['क़्h', '','ख़्'], ['ज़्h', '','ऴ्'], ['।\\.', '','॥'], ['a', '','अ'], ['b', '','ब्'], ['c', '','क्'], ['d', '','द्'], ['E', '','ऎ'], ['(f|F)', '','फ़्'], ['g', '','ग्'], ['h', '','ह्'], ['i', '','इ'], ['j', '','ज्'], ['k', '','क्'], ['l', '','ल्'], ['m', '','म्'], ['n', '','न्'], ['O', '','ऒ'], ['p', '','प्'], ['q', '','क़्'], ['r', '','र्'], ['s', '','स्'], ['t', '','त्'], ['u', '','उ'], ['(v|w)', '','व्'], ['x', '','क्ष्'], ['y', '','य्'], ['(z|Z)', '','ज़्'], ['A', '','आ'], ['B', '','ब्ब्'], ['C', '','क्क्'], ['D', '','ड्'], ['e', '','ए'], //'F', '','फ्'], ['G', '','ग्ग्'], ['H', '','ः'], ['I', '','ई'], ['J', '','ज्ज्'], ['K', '','क्क्'], ['L', '','ळ्'], ['M', '','ं'], ['N', '','ण्'], ['o', '','ओ'], ['P', '','प्प्'], //'Q', '','अ'], ['R', '','ऋ'], ['S', '','श्'], ['T', '','ट्'], ['U', '','ऊ'], ['(V|W)', '','व्व्'], ['X', '','क्ष्'], ['Y', '','य्य्'], //'z', '','अ' ['0', '','०'], ['1', '','१'], ['2', '','२'], ['3', '','३'], ['4', '','४'], ['5', '','५'], ['6', '','६'], ['7', '','७'], ['8', '','८'], ['9', '','९'], ['~', '','्'], ['\\.', '','।'], ['//', '','ऽ'], ['\\`', '','़'], ['(\u200C)*_', '', '\u200c'] ]; sa_scheme.rules.unshift.apply( sa_scheme.rules, custom_rules ); } ); |
-Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) २०:२२, २८ सप्तम्बर् २०१२ (UTC)
I want to draw attention to this page- मूषकम्. Somebody made it featured article. Calling mouse मूषकम् is plain wrong. We can not do literal translations. Sanskrit have a standard for which it is known, we have to maintain that quality. Wikipedia is becoming main source of information for many people, seeing that use of incorrect nomenclature to make language ambigious is not really what sanskrit stand for. Sanskrit is known for maintaining unambogious clear speech in most cases and giving you ability to be very ambigious without compromising to vernacular like non scientific nomenclature. But use of such vernacularization would destroy everything sanskrit is known for and the reason for its revival. That is what seperate Sanskrit form Prakrit. Calling it something like that in Prakrit or Hindi wikipedia wouldn't damage anything, but it isn't something which quite match what Sanskrit is all about. Recent I checked this English-Sanskrit dictionary specially made for computer related terms do have many very good translation but sorry to say some are absolutely incorrect. Translation of kernel is हृदयम् and गर्भः which I assume is related with kernel being the center of most operting system upon which everything depends. Correct translation would be संविधा गर्भः. Many languages like Chinese and Hebrew have done the mistake to copy the rubbish vernacular-class literal translation of english, let's not repeat it. History have shown how plain wrong it goes. Like that example of term 'sinus' (sine in english). Originally 'Jeeva' in sanskrit (=chord). Arabs started calling it 'Jeeba'. Arabs didn't used vowel marks those days so Latin translators of arabic translated text from sanskrit originals interprated 'jb'(no vowels) as jaib which means to blossoms in arabic. So they translated it into 'sinus' which means to blossom in Latin! Guess what we get out of what. Correct translation of mouse should be: सारकनिर्देशकम् And then we use the foreign words we put halant on the last akshar, like see example from the mushakam page (ग्राफिकल्-यूसर्-इन्टरफेस्). Oh my god. English don't have non vowel sounds at end! It is impossible. English have very few non vowel sounds like 's' of best. They are almost never on end. No modern language does and yet they are at many place. And finally on use of foreign words in sanskrit, I think they shouldn't be inflexed. I think they should be used as avyay as they are not analyzable to roots. Though I am not very soure on this. 卐 卐 हर्षवर्धनः 卐 卐 ०६:३०, १० जूलय् २०१३ (UTC)
Hi Wikimedians,
Apologies for posting this text in English.
As you people might be aware, Wikimania 2015 which is going to be held in Mexico from July 14th to 19th. We, the Indian attendees at Wikimania, would like to represent Wiki Indic Community booth in the same. We are creating Leaflets and Posters for the community village at Wikimania 2015 to display in Wikimania 2015. We would like to invite you to gather the content and design(optional) for posters (Sample) and leaflets (Sample) about the Indic language project of your choice. We will take care of printing and displaying the posters/leaflets.
The maximum dimensions for your poster are 36 x 48 in (91.44 x 121.92 cm). We suggest using the A0 paper size, which is 33.11 x 46.81 in (~84 x 118 cm). The contents of the poster has to be in English. Posters and leaflets based on all Indic language Wiki projects are welcome. The design should be a media file uploaded to Wiki Commons. Please post the link to your content/design file on http://wiki.wikimedia.in/Wikimania_2015/Booth/Posters_Leaflets before 25th of June. In case if you face any issues please reachout to Dineshkumar Ponnusamy or Netha Hussain.
For guidelines regarding creating posters, please have a look at this link : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Posters_that_work
We look forward to receiving your posters/leaflets and displaying them while at Wikimania 2015!
Note: This is not a competition or contest, we expect at most 1 poster and 1 leaflet from each Community.
Sanskrit is missing from this page:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/There_is_also_a_Wikipedia_in_your_language
More than 100 languages are now listed.
Thank you, Varlaam (चर्चा) १६:२३, २३ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia संस्कृतम् article पुरालेखः १, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). भिन्नोल्लेखः यावत् न भवेत्, तावत् CC BY-SA 4.0 इत्यत्र उल्लेखो भवति । Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki संस्कृतम् (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.