Wiki English
Wiki EnglishWiki DeutschWiki Nederlands

redirects For Discussion

Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed.

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion
XFD backlog
V Jan Feb Mar Apr Total
CfD 0 0 0 21 21
TfD 0 0 0 0 0
MfD 0 0 0 1 1
FfD 0 0 0 1 1
RfD 0 0 0 36 36
AfD 0 0 0 9 9

Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.

  • If you want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold!
  • If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. For non-controversial cases, place a technical request; if a discussion is required, then start a requested move.
  • If you think a redirect points to the wrong target article, this is a good place to discuss what should be the proper target.
  • Redirects should not be deleted just because they have no incoming links. Please do not use this as the only reason to delete a redirect. However, redirects that do have incoming links are sometimes deleted, so that is not a sufficient condition for keeping. (See § When should we delete a redirect? for more information.)

Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.

Before listing a redirect for discussion

Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:

The guiding principles of RfD

Shortcut
  • The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves staring blankly at "Search results 1–10 out of 378" instead of the article they were looking for. If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect.
  • Redirects are cheap. They take up little storage space and use very little bandwidth. It doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around. On the flip side, deleting redirects is also cheap because recording the deletion takes up little storage space and uses very little bandwidth. There is no harm in deleting problematic redirects.
  • If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete.
  • Redirects nominated in contravention of Wiki: Redirect will be speedily kept.
  • RfD can also serve as a central discussion forum for debates about which page a redirect should target. In cases where retargeting the redirect could be considered controversial, it is advisable to leave a notice on the talk page of the redirect's current target page or the proposed target page to refer readers to the redirect's nomination to allow input and help form consensus for the redirect's target.
  • Requests for deletion of redirects from one page's talk page to another's do not need to be listed here. Anyone can remove the redirect by blanking the page. The G6 criterion for speedy deletion may be appropriate.
  • In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be helpful to the reader.

When should we delete a redirect?


Shortcuts

The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:

  • a redirect may contain non-trivial edit history;
  • if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links (such links coming from older revisions of Wikipedia pages, from edit summaries, from other Wiki projects or from elsewhere on the internet, do not show up in "What links here").

Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.

Reasons for deleting

Shortcut

You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (but note also the exceptions listed below this list):

  1. The redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles", it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wiki English.
  2. The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on Adam Smith, so the redirect should be deleted.
  3. The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". (Speedy deletion criterion G10 and G3 may apply.) See also § Neutrality of redirects.
  4. The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.)
  5. The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting "Apple" to "Orange". (Speedy deletion criterion G1 may apply.)
  6. It is a cross-namespace redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. The major exception to this rule are the pseudo-namespace shortcut redirects, which technically are in the main article space. Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "MOS:" redirects, for example, are an exception to this rule. (Note also the existence of namespace aliases such as WP:. Speedy deletion criterion R2 may apply if the target namespace is something other than Category:, Template:, Wiki: , Help:, or Portal .)
  7. If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under speedy deletion criterion G8. You should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first and that it has not become broken through vandalism.
  8. If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. (Implausible typos or misnomers are candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3, if recently created.)
  9. If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then the title needs to be freed up to make way for the move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for G6 speedy deletion, or alternatively (with the suppressredirect user right; available to page movers and admins), perform a round-robin move. If not, take the article to Requested moves.
  10. Shortcut
    If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.

Reasons for not deleting

Shortcut

However, avoid deleting such redirects if:

  1. They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a merge (see Wiki: Merge and delete). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
  2. They would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are not candidates for deletion on those grounds because they are of benefit to the browsing user. Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in the article texts because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links; consider tagging the redirect with the {{R from misspelling}} template to assist editors in monitoring these misspellings.
  3. They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article.
  4. Deleting redirects runs the risk of breaking incoming or internal links. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including CamelCase links (e.g. WolVes) and old subpage links, should be left alone in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. See also Wiki: Link rot § Link rot on non-Wiki sites.
  5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. Evidence of usage can be gauged by using the wikishark or pageviews tool on the redirect to see the number of views it gets.
  6. The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a plural form to a singular form.

Neutrality of redirects

Shortcut

Just as article titles using non-neutral language are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{R from non-neutral name}}.

Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:

  1. Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. Climategate → Climatic Research Unit email controversy).
  2. Articles created as POV forks may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. Barack Obama Muslim rumor → deleted and now redirected to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories).
  3. The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the words to avoid guidelines and the general neutral point of view policy. For instance the non-neutral expression "Attorneygate" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.

The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.

Closing notes

Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).

How to list a redirect for discussion

Shortcut
STEP I.
Tag the redirect(s).

  Enter {{subst:rfd|content= at the very beginning of the redirect page you are listing for discussion and enter }} at the very end of the page.

  • Please do not mark the edit as minor (m).
  • Please include in the edit summary the phrase:
    Nominated for RfD: see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]].
  • Save the page ("Publish changes").
  • If you are unable to edit the redirect page because of protection, this step can be omitted, and after step 2 is completed, a request to add the RFD template can be put on the redirect's talk page.
  • If the redirect you are nominating is in template namespace, consider adding |showontransclusion=1 to the RfD tag so that people using the template redirect are aware of the nomination.
  • If you are nominating multiple redirects as a group, repeat all the above steps for each redirect being nominated.
STEP II.
List the entry on RfD.

 Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries.

  • Enter this text below the date heading:
    {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName|target=TargetArticle|text=The action you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for that action.}} ~~~~
  • For this template:
    • Put the redirect's name in place of RedirectName, put the target article's name in place of TargetArticle, and include a reason after text=.
    • Note that, for this step, the "target article" is the current target of the redirect (if you have a suggestion for a better target, include this in the text that you insert after text=).
  • Please use an edit summary such as:
    Nominating [[RedirectName]]
    (replacing RedirectName with the name of the redirect you are nominating).
  • To list multiple related redirects for discussion, use the following syntax. Repeat line 2 for N number of redirects:
    {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName1|target=TargetArticle1}}
    {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectName2|target=TargetArticle2}}
    {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectNameN|target=TargetArticleN|text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}} ~~~~
  • If the redirect has had previous RfDs, you can add {{Oldrfdlist|previous RfD without brackets|result of previous RfD}} directly after the rfd2 template.
STEP III.
Notify users.

  It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate.

To find the main contributors, look in the page history of the respective redirect(s). For convenience, the template

{{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~

may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as:
Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]

Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages.

  • Please consider using What links here to locate other redirects that may be related to the one you are nominating. After going to the redirect target page and selecting "What links here" in the toolbox on the left side of your computer screen, select both "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links" filters to display the redirects to the redirect target page.

Current list

Shortcuts

April 26

Lim-1

Can also refer to Lim1 transcription factor and (at least the latter) to Lim^1. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I have no preference as to where these redirects go, but I will explain why they currently redirect to Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15. "Lim-1" was the designation of the Polish-built MiG-15. There was also a "Lim-2", which was the Polish-built MiG-15bis. - ZLEA T\C 15:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highnoon

R from merge that does not seem to be mentioned at the target any longer. Confusable with High Noon as is, but as an R from merge perhaps there's a deeper noteworthy-ness of the missing space... Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overriding (mathematics)

Not mentioned anymore at target page, see diff. Tea2min (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Knightfall (comics)

Delete. No mention of "Knightfall" in the target article. Mika1h (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PORTIA

Although I see PORTIA (in all caps) mentioned here, I think it makes sense to redirect to Portia (disambig page) instead. JuniperChill (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suttara

Not mentioned at target page, searching the term doesn't appear to give any relevant results. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I've mis-spelled the title of the article, it should be Mulabbes, and I've moved it to its proper name. רמרום (talk) 10:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Beheld His Glory

A TV episode for a program not on Wikipedia, and not discussed at the hosting show article either. Not currently a helpful redirect for people interested in this topic, as it would otherwise not exist for people that read the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ドラゴンボールGT

"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 09:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ベビー

"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 09:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23,924 rebounds

That's the exact number of rebounds collected by Wilt Chamberlain in his career. Definitely unworthy of a redirect. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 08:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete Anyone who knows that obscure total already knows Wilt Chamberlain. Redirects aren't for knowledgeable people merely testing obscure search terms. —Bagumba (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Westbrick

Per WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:RFD#DELETE. Also it is never discussed nor mentioned in the article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mark McCool

A combination of The Undertaker's real first name and his wife's surname. It makes no sense. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Giannis Antetokounmpo

Article already exists. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaq's Size

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingofthepirates.com

Dead website that was probably fanmade as well. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DragonBall and DragonBall Z

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Super Saiyan 6

This transformation doesn't even exist. No one is going to use it to find "Dragon Ball". Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Salt evasion of Oncotype_DX. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, this was accepted through AfC in 2012 and BLAR'd in 2017, while Oncotype DX was salted at the same time in 2017, so not salt evasion. Unless there was something visible in the deleted histories that you saw, @Pppery:. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Nope. That matches what I can see. Still not mentioned at the target, though, so should still be deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        If this isn't salt evasion then, it should be restored and sent to AfD if non-notable, as this is an article which made it through AfC by User:Graeme Bartlett and survived as a standalone topic for years, before being BLAR'd into a page without mention. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Delete or Restore?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bluetista

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WWE:FE's Shawn Michaels

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Gambill

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rey Mysterio/version 1

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eddict

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk Angel

Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Captivate

Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. A cursory search onwiki suggests that this is on the verge of being disambiguatable, with (partial?) title matches like USS Captivate (a ship), Captivating (a book), and Captivation (a movie). But I'm not quite sure if this passes the muster of WP:PTM, so to RfD I go. Duckmather (talk) 04:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate. Disambiguation page drafted below the redirect. - Eureka Lott 14:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thonk

Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Apparently "Thonk" was the title of one album this guy made in 1994, but as many of y'all might know, it's also the name of a commonly used emoji (particularly on Discord). I think Thinking, wikt:thonk, or (if mentioned there) List of Generation Z slang would all be better targets than this, but I'm not quite sure - I'd be happy with Michael Manring being mentioned in a hatnote though. Duckmather (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbino's Quest

A fictional element and/or creative work that is not mentioned at the target. "Gorbino" does not appear at the target, nor does "Gorbino" appear anywhere on Wiki English. Much less their quest appearing anywhere on Wikipedia; no quest is ever alluded to at the target page either. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • gorbino's quest is a fictional game and recurring... "thing" there, and probably maybe the setting of one of the levels
    this is just like gorbino's quest. this is the gorbino's quest of redirects i'd keep if a mention can reasonably be made (probably in the plot section), or weak delete otherwise cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • gorbino's quest is found in cruelty squad and i wholeheartedly promise you anybody who form some bizarre reason searches for "gorbino's quest" on wikipedia is looking for the game's article Formaldehydemaster (talk) 00:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:CRUFT + unmentioned. We're not the Cruelty Squad wiki, and pageviews reflect that-- this redirect gets practically no views whatsoever. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - mentioned enough in the game that it is worth looking up to determine if it is an actual game (possibly by the developer of Cruelty Squad). It turns out it is an entirely fictional element but the redirect is useful for a reader looking for that information. It'd be better if there were a mention in the target article, though. (I found and used that redirect back in 2021 in that context, and then added rcats to it afterwards.) (A redirect for just "Gorbino" would not be useful, though, and one does not currently exist either.) --Pokechu22 (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gribbly

No mention of "grib" at the target article, much less a something or someone that's "gribbly". Alternatives include Gribbly's Day Out which exists as a standalone article, as well as Gribble, Roman Gribbs, and the music director of Rec Room (video game). Zero idea or indication why this is going to Grunge currently, although it's done so since 2007. (Doesn't seem to have been mentioned within the former history of Grunger, which is where it used to point back in 2005). These 2005 redirects are... surely something, lol. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)

Not appropriate for a "2007-present" redirect to point to events from a decade ago. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 25

229762

This is similar to a previous discussion about minor planet names with only the numeration, intsead of the complete name. In short, this redirect is unhelpful, ambigous, and unrelated to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà. I believe that no one will be normally searching to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà by just typing the numeration. Although the minor planet's name is very difficult to type, there are still more plausible, natural and simple redirects, such as the provisional designatiom 2007 UK126. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 22:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Keep per e.g. 99942, 136199, 486958. The redirects in the previous discussion were smaller numbers with only four digits; they could also refer to e.g. years. SevenSpheres (talk) 23:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep, for numbers that large it is unlikely that someone would type the same number as a large/well-known minor planet and be looking for something else. Also, someone having only encountered the current designation 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà will be most likely to search it by its number, as it can be typed on a standard keyboard and doesn't require additional knowledge of a former provisional designation. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS: OVERLINKING

Precedent indicates this is not useful as a redirect. If "MOS" is supposed to be a namespace, this is not how namespaces work. Spaces should not be separating the prefix and the title, and MOS:OVERLINKING already has existed for seven years prior. Delete per Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5#MOS: HYPHEN and others Utopes (talk / cont) 22:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. My phone keyboard likes to insert spaces in such places (just tried it). So this is potentially useful, and I can't see any harm. Sad that the other (even more useful looking) MOS: redirects were deleted. —Kusma (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mos:DAB and etc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The correct pseudo-namespace is MOS. Throughout the years, there have been a number of "lazy prefix" versions of MOS redirects floating around mainspace, which don't capitalize the full prefix of "Manual of Style". The argument is that "Mos" is easier to type than "MOS", and people that don't capitalize the searches would otherwise be piping their pageviews through the lowercase variants. However, this nomination consists of all the pages that are otherwise doing "two things ineffectively". It's implausible to expect someone to type "Mos" in lowercase, before changing their mind and capitalizing the rest of the title, or parts of. There are only 11 of such cases across article-space. For the rest of the "Mos" titles, the vast majority of these pseudo-pseudonamespace redirects are constructed like Mos:bold, in all lowercase for "maximum laziness", which at least serves a unique purpose that the full-capital prefix does not. The swapping back and forth between capitalization is unnatural and already covered by the search box. In all of these situations, the correct version of "MOS:X" already exists, so typing this in yields no difference in results besides unnecessary name duplication among titles. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: not sure exactly how implausible it is... I know that the WP prefix is case insensitive but don't always know if all the case variations after it have been made, so I'm pretty sure I have typed "wp:DAB" before, which works since WP is an alias for the Wikipedia namespace. I could see that logic carrying over to the MOS/mos pseudo namespace; deletion could still make sense since they're meant to be internal and are part of the article space and the bar for keeping is higher. Skynxnex (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I'm not often on this page, but isn't this a case where Wiki: Redirects are cheap applies? What do they hurt? One person's laziness is another person's efficiency. SchreiberBike | ⌨  00:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yes, plausible redirects are useful and it is nice to have a few lying around, but these titles are all the opposite of efficient. Efficient would be MOS:DP or Mos:dp, not swapping capitalization up and down multiple times. Pseudo-namespaces prefixes are not lowercase. The list of shortcuts is CAT, T, H, MOS, P, per WP:Shortcut#Pseudo-namespaces. Because PNRs exist in mainspace, yet point to technical/codified back-end MOS pages, a consistent structure is imperative for shortcuts. Because these titles are in violation of common-held shortcut practices, these types of titles are not cheap, as there is no need for every capitalization alternation over the moon. Pages that start with "Mos" are already out of convention, but they see pageviews due to lowercase-only typing. If these aren't meant for lowercase-only typing (due to the capitals in the title part), they should be removed to minimize the instances of unnecessary PNRs in mainspace. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom as an improper capitalization on a nonexistent namespace. (However, if any of these redirect have incoming links, replace them with their all-caps variants prior to deletion.) Steel1943 (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. All-caps are fine and the usual convention for such redirects, at least regarding the prefix. Gawaon (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep. Redirects are cheap, and these are plausible as typos from people hitting or not hitting caps lock while typing shortcuts. They harm nothing and can just be ignored by those bothered by their inconsistency. That's a you problem, not a problem with the redirects. oknazevad (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • While these redirects are harmless, deleting them only disturbs linking – typing in the search box will give the same result whether they exist or not. So strong neutral I guess. —Kusma (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

App£€

WP:UNNATURAL redirect not mentioned at target. Unclear if this is supposed to imply the products are expensive or if it's leetspeak. My keyboard doesn't even have the pound or euro signs. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I feel like not too long ago, there was a case that came through RfD where an "S" was replaced by a dollar sign ($), and something was said about such a title being an unmentioned/disparaging nickname, or to that effect. In any case, the outcome I remember there ended up being deletion, and I concur regardless that this should be deleted as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Was it Micro$oft? Presumably there would have to be evidence of this kind of a satiric misspelling for Apple to keep this one, which did start as a redirect to Criticism of Apple Inc., but that article also doesn't mention it now. --Joy (talk) 10:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As a potential insult, similar to "Micro$oft" or something. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information Support

Doesn't seem like the ideal target for this phrase, as I believe this phrase to be ambiguous. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Tech support which seems like the closest match (although I do agree with you that this phrase seems confusing/poorly put). Duckmather (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kissing pussy

Unlikely/not particularly useful search term which is rather unencyclopedic. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1.3 patch

not the only possible target for a 1.3 patch, not the only possible target for a fanmade 1.3 patch, and not the most likely target for a 1.3 patch (that seems to be cyberpunk 2077) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I feel like Minecraft's 1.3 update would also be more likely as a target. This is way too ambiguous and would not make a good disambiguation page, so we should just delete it. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, basically any game that has patches could use a 1.3 patch. I would even disagree on Cyberpunk 2077 being the most prominent, as I could think of like 5 others that were majorly influential, Terraria also up there along with Minecraft and a whole list. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Daikatana is perhaps the best target we have right now but search results seem like it'll take care of it so delete since it's too ambiguous and not primary "enough" even if primary. Skynxnex (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Could apply to literally any game with a version 1.3, too ambigious. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Dede

Very implausible redirect. Averages single-digit numbers of yearly pageviews and has less than 200 pageviews for its entire existence since it was created in 2015. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: tag with {{R to section}} (maybe with {{R from misspelling}} can't remember if that or incorrect name would be better here). Doesn't seem implausible to remember the name as just two "D"s as opposed to three since both are somewhat unusual and seems harmless. Skynxnex (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @Skynxnex: Judging by the extremely low pageviews, it does seem implausible. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        @QuicoleJR since I don't think there's any risk of confusion or this redirect making it harder to find another article, having any actual page views (which this seems to) is evidence this redirect is at least somewhat useful. Skynxnex (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Page views don't tell the story, I think this is a very easy mistake to make. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not a useful redirect to chop off letters from the name, which ends up being closer in composition and pronunciation to King Dead. In any case, the correct version of "Dedede" is already autofilling after the just first three characters of "ded" anyway, so this redirect is functionless and otherwise confusing. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) Keep. Totally appropriate {{R from incorrect name}}, which I created almost a decade ago. Unless there is some sort of evidence this redirect is ambiguous, the target is appropriate since the amount of "de"s in "Dedede" can be forgotten. Steel1943 (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      ...And I'm still convinced that this target is appropriate regardless of the "delete" vote I edit conflicted as the redirect is a partial title match for the intended subject, rather than having to transpose letters and replace an "e" with an "a". Steel1943 (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Dede and Dead can both be said in one syllable, and are each similar as 4 letters words. One can be formed by removing the vowel "E" and adding the vowel "A". King Dead, King Ded, King Dede are all super close. Whereas Dedede isn't just a letter swap, but a new-letter ADD... and then YET ANOTHER added letter, forming a three-syllable word instead of one. Also "Dedede" is insanely easy to spell and I would not expect any other spellings to hit there apart from King DDD. I'd vote to delete King DD were it real. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        I'll also point towards Dede (religious figure) as being a leader called "Dede", which might have ambiguity towards this shortened Dede (especially as Dedede is never called Dede). Utopes (talk / cont) 21:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          Problem is that still ... people can forget or not care about the amount of "de"s. And here, I'd believe the spelling rather than the pronunciation makes the difference here, meaning the likelihood of someone looking up this redirect to locate "King Dead" or "King Ded" is highly unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 00:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep I think it's a believable typo, and redirects are cheap. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genie (feral child and etc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Well, in for a penny, in for a pound... this nomination consists of every remaining redirect with unclosed parenthesis, of which there are now only twelve. All of these typos are not plausible to intentionally make on their own. Because there's been cumulatively 1000+ or so of these redirect types deleted over the last few months, this nomination seeks to determine whether there's a threshold that makes these redirects acceptable, or if one even exists. Most of these redirects have come to exist through erroneous links, which are updateable. While it's good to have redirects from common misspellings lying around for ease of navigation on Wikipedia, the presence of implausible redirect errors sets unreasonable expectations and portrays the faulty notion to readers that "infinite typo variations are encouraged, regardless of likelihood", when this is not currently the case. For the most part, spelling variations are accepted in redirects; especially with words that are tricky to spell, having a set of titles with minor differences can be useful to capture likely, intentional errors. When it pertains to disambiguation, though, there will never be a time where errors in the act of disambiguation are expected, for any title. While someone might spell a title like Hampster with an intentional (but incorrect) "P", one can generally have 100% confidence that a title with a left parenthesis will contain a right parenthesis, and, as an extension, typing in a title that doesn't contain a right parenthesis will have a 0% likelihood of being redirected to the correct title, as it will never be correctly expected. The disambiguator is Wikipedia's "official insertion" onto the title based on other article names that co-exist here. The tagline's format can be safely assumed as error-free, or if there is an error in the disambiguation, that it will be corrected ASAP without hesitation. Being locked into keeping tabs on any and all errors within this "topic title guarantee" inherited from Wikipedia disambiguation precedent, just because of one (or twelve remaining) bad links on the internet, is just not worth for titles that are one punctuation mark away from the correctness that was already assumed beforehand. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all - Note that I !voted delete on the last batch you nominated. This batch I'm !voting keep for the simple reason that they are demonstrably useful to someone... in that these redirects are all getting use (noting again that this is unlike the last batch). They're WP:CHEAP, they're useful, they're harmless. Note that I expressly do NOT support the creation of more of these things, for all the reasons cited by nom, but I don't think we should deliberately go out of our way to break someone's workflow just because it makes our database tidier. If, at some point in the future, these stop getting regular use for an extended period of time, I'd be happy to see them gone. But for now, they get use, they're unambiguous, they should stay. (No offense to nom, by the way, I appreciate getting community input on where the limits are / should be) Fieari (talk) 07:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all per Fieari. Deletion would inconvenience readers without brining any benefits to anybody. Thryduulf (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as unnecessary. One parenthesis missing does not justify these redirects when the search function automatically fills in the desired results for anyone searching for them. These are just pointless redirects. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all per Fieari and Thryduulf, and the previous discussions. Genie (feral child has gone down in use since the prior discussions except that it got over 6,500 hits on March 29, more than some articles get in a year. It's clearly still useful; Wikipedia's mission is to provide information to its readers, not to break things and hope that an external website notices (they won't). Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:UNNATURAL typos. The search box fills in the parentheses for you, I doubt anyone is going to type an opening parenthesis, forget to close it, and then hit enter without selecting the correct option from search. As for other websites, that's their problem. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      These redirects are not typos for the benefit of people already on Wikipedia, but people navigating to Wikipedia from external sites. Many sites most prominently Reddit, have an issue where the trailing parenthesis is cut off in URLs without some HTML wizardry. The site "forces" users to make these "typos" when you just copy the link sometimes. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all I think my past self would have (and did) support deleting these. But we come down to yet another delete these convention failing to uphold a challenge on its merits, and so it goes. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and WP:RDAB due to the missing end parentheses. Also, delete per precedence set at Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Redirects with disambiguators missing ")" and Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 14#Conjunction (grammar and etc.. Steel1943 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all — the assertion in the description "Most of these redirects have come to exist through erroneous links, which are updateable." is vague and misleading: it hides the useful truth which is that "At least some of these links are NOT updateable.", for example in IRC chat logs (e.g. for "Address (geography"). Agreed with prior Keep all arguments that a small handful of such redirects are WP:CHEAP. The net-net here is that a small handful are providing more utility (fixing unchangeable slightly erroneous links to Wikipedia, for a smoother Wikipedia experience) than cost. That's also a reasonable standard to apply for future such exceptions (source of link is apparently unchangeable). The arguments for Delete all appear to mostly be forms of the "Perfect is the enemy of good" problem. Tantek (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      All links are updateable, through either direct editing, or replacement if locked. The notice that appears on every page saying "did you mean to close your parentheses" would not discourage readers from reaching their destination being just a click away, and encourages the phasing-out of any erroneous links. "Perfect is the enemy of good" does not seem to be accurate when we aren't dealing with an out-of-reach concept of totality; there's no 80-20 about it. This the entire set of titles that are out of alignment with redirect fundamentals, and the problem can be solved with just this RfD. The lack of these redirects will not prevent anyone beyond finding it gone a single time, and immediately finding a new solution in seconds, whether it comes from adding a parentheses to their search term or url, or adding it to the link itself if handy, or generating one's own link. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all if you are going to rescue typos by redirection then why stop with close parenthese. Why not redirect E Mathematical Contant and Genie (ferral child) OrewaTel (talk) 02:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and RDAB, and also per precedence of previous discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 02:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - per all above, also a) Aren't these only "getting used" because as people type in names, the auto-fill starts listing results and as they get to the end of the name, but before they type in the closing parathesis, the redirect without one populates to the bottom of the auto-fill box making it most obvious and easy to click on,(but at that point, the correct, full name is right there at the top of the results as well).

    b) It doesn't seem anyone wants to see more of these types of redirects created, so wouldn't deleting help with that? (There are people who literally spend all their time looking for pages to create, and having redirects like this to obstensibly compensate for typos in page names will just encourage the creation of more.)

    Their usage is a false positive, they don't really assist with anything, removing them will not hamper anyone's ability to search, and if we don't want these types of redirects, then we shouldn't be making a special exception to this group just because they exist. (jmho) - wolf 04:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all based on the fact there are legitimate reasons why people might be visiting these redirects other than simply typos. For example, in Markdown, unescaped right parentheses are interpreted as the end of a URL, so often times when people link these Wikipedia pages in Reddit comments, people will be directed to these sorts of titles. In addition, of course redirects are cheap. --Habst (talk) 16:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all These redirects are explicitly discouraged and would fall under WP:R3 if created today. There is precedent for deleting them, and keeping them would have WP:PANDORA issues. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete all per all the other times those redirects with missing parentheses got deleted cogsan (nag me (stalk me 18:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. Redirects are WP:CHEAP, and these are all likely from external links on sites such as Reddit and are absolutely pointed at the correct targets. These also all appear to be popular enough to get regular use about 5 users a day or so. Genie especially is frequently posted and can get very high daily page views (e.g. 6k a few weeks ago). It does Wikipedia no good to delete it or to force them to make an additional click. Arguments to delete because no one is going to forget typing the closing parentheses or because of auto-fill should be ignored, as the use case for this is almost exclusively linking from external sites. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Here is an example of the formatting issues with Reddit's Markdown language for its posts that is the primary reason for these redirects existing in the first place: [1]. Very few people are using these links deliberately. They are being forced to, and we should've deliberately inconvenience readers because of minor stylistic issues. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        We shouldn't be responsible for creating redirects accounting for bugs in other platform's errors. A bug that has been fixed years ago, from the looks of it, being fixed well before the reddit post was made, as implied. People using old reddit are doing so knowing full well its limitations. So now there's zero surprise that a parenthesis could go missing at the end of a URL, as it's been long-since documented and understood, apparently. The solution is not "allow infinite redirects with botched-up disambiguation because old-reddit users might run into a broken link here and there, despite it being fixed for many years but refuse to upgrade to avoid it"; or, we can stop supporting "Foo (bar" titles due to the pollution it causes on our end, allowing implausible misnomers among redirects, splitting histories and causing messes and clutter that can be simply avoided. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          (Also in response to the reddit poster's query linked, I tried the second hyperlink on both old and new reddit and it seems to be working fine for me; I'm getting to Paris (surname) both ways.) Utopes (talk / cont) 20:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all These are pointless, as people are unlikely to be typing in the full disambiguation anyway. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all – Many chat programs and similar, when making links clickable, automatically omit a trailing parenthesis, considering it part of the surrounding punctuation, so redirects repairing this are always useful. Gawaon (talk) 09:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Marlow.

Unnecessary. I don't think anybody would add a period at the end of the desired page name, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it was at this title for about 13 minutes in 2006 and per Wiki English.. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per G6, this is a redirect left behind from moving a page that was obviously created at the wrong title. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White remake

Could refer to most films listed at {{Snow White}}, such as Mirror Mirror (film) and Snow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect references Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions of Snow White that are not Disney-related. Steel1943 (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Snow White (disambiguation), basically everything on that list after the first is a remake by definition. Alternatively, delete due to being vague and unhelpful (deletion is probably my first choice now that I think about it more), Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out what article people are imagining in their heads by typing "remake" nowadays. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      On second thought, I'm striking my retarget !vote. Wikipedia is not a search engine, "remake" is not useful in the form of a redirect. Currently it refers to anything on that list, but it's too vague and subjective in doing so (as remake isn't mentioned). Would be ridiculous to have Foo remake target any disambiguation page with multiple pieces of fiction with the same title, so let Google or Wikipedia's search function figure it out. Delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to Snow White (disambiguation) as plausible search by a reader. I'm also fine with delete due to the malformed "remake" modifier --Lenticel (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as per Utopes, and tag as R from incomplete disambig. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator preference: Delete per above. The existence of the word "remake" and since it makes it so the redirect is not a word-for-word title variation of "Snow White" leave me to believe that the nominated redirect is better deleted than targeting a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Snow White (franchise) that has got hatnotes to anything else the reader may be interested in. I find this a better alternative to Snow White (disambiguation). I find suffixing of "remake" to a film as a valid search term. I would do the same if I was looking for a film remake, or the latest remake if there are multiple. Jay 💬 06:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As far as I'm aware, the upcoming Disney remake is the most notable (if not the only) remake of a previous film titled Snow White. Mirror Mirror (film) is not a remake of a prioer film; neither is Snow White and the Huntsman. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per InfiniteNexus's argument. Fieari (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Infinite. Disney's remake is the only one I've seen referred to as this and is the most notable as Infinite said. The others do not qualify as a remake. Retargeting to a DAB page and deleting are not viable options as we are supposed to help guide readers, and with the amount of traction the upcoming film has gotten already, I'm sure this will remain a useful search term as those looking for the "Snow White remake" are most likely looking for the 2025 film. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Face Of Dorian Gray(single)

Implausible disambiguation typo. No pages link to it, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete it was at this title for a few months in 2006. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per G6, as this is a redirect left behind from moving a page that was obviously created at the wrong title. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolas Macko

Macko is not listed at the page for this shooting. What I will note, is that looking up "Nikolas Macko", the shooting almost didn't come up on the first page (was the very last result for me)" This might make sense as it took place in 2007, and as time progresses, older results are less likely to be promoted higher. But in any event, we have no content on this individual. In 2007, they attempted to fend off the shooting from taking place. But, these efforts are not described anywhere on the page or on Wikipedia, to my understanding. I don't think that this is a particularly useful redirect, in the article's current state. Just as Google displays a wide assortment of topics related to different "Nikolas Macko"s, if he isn't discussed in the article any longer, I don't think this redirect is necessary either. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    As it should be worth noting, this redirect was fully protected almost IMMEDIATELY after creation in 2007, and remained fully protected for another 17 years up until just a month ago. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Utopes: Judging by the Google search results for "Nikolas Macko" "shooting", a mention could potentially be added to the article. What do you think? QuicoleJR (talk) 17:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @QuicoleJR: I mean, it used to be a part of a pretty hefty section a long time back, during the revisions I checked in 2007. The shooting article was getting what looks like 1-2k edits every day during the timeline and immediate aftermath of the shooting (the article now has nearly 14k revisions). I have to imagine that Macko's segment was removed for a reason. The article was mainly talking about his eye-witness reporting. I don't really see a need to mention Macko, especially when looking at recent Google search results, the shooting is now really low. I don't want to force in his name into the article if it doesn't need to be. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: don't need to associate a living person who's only connection seems to be an eyewitness. If he gets more, sustained coverage, then of course that could be added to the article and the redirect recreated (or what have you). Skynxnex (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Labour Party (historical)

A spelling variation of recently deleted Democratic Labor Party (historical). Likely not the same case as the Labor vs Labour spelling distinction has proven to represent different parties, but this disambiguation still might not be the most helpful as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed adoodie

Gag name not mentioned at the target article. Additionally, I have not found any mention of it on this list (although it is user-generated and could be incomplete).

A variant of this gag name had been used in the Simpsons episode 24 Minutes according to the article, but spelt as 'Ahmed Adoudi'. Regardless, I don't think that this joke name is notable enough to be a redirect to any articles involving this. Xeroctic (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basilan Unity Party

No mention of "Unity" or this party at the target page, people searching for this topic will not receive any information about this at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: Asenso Abrenio is another example of an undiscussed party that was recently deleted. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jau Bai Gavat Unseen

This seems to be a piece of programming, although it is not mentioned or discussed at the target article, and creates the picture that we have something about this topic when we do not. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drama Juniors Marathi

No mention of any programming with this title at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mental gymnastics

I had to do some serious mental gymnastics to wrap my head around why this redirect exists. Sure, some people may perform mental gymnastics when "they're uncomfortable from their beliefs being inconsistent and contradictory". A similar idea I feel could be people perform the act of running to get from Point A to Point B, although that doesn't make the "running" a good redirect to "pathfinding". It's a singular mean to the end, and not everyone that has cognitive dissonance is "performing mental gymnastics", and not everyone that does mental gymnastics has cognitive dissonance. Example: I'm fairly sure I'm performing mental gymnastics right now in an attempt to jump through the logical hoops that went into this redirect, and I don't think I'm too uncomfortable from cognitive dissonance. I believe I've come to understand why, although I don't think it's a great end-all-be-all redirect that takes people to the right location at 100% intentions every time. To me, I feel like Convergent thinking or Divergent thinking are what I would have associated mental gymnastics with, i.e. following along with someone's thought process jumping through hoops with twists and turns to an eventual endpoint. Also, "mental gymnastics" is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Soft redirect to wiktionary Okmrman (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid nails

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Lower case version of what's apparently a brand of glue...? Adhesive? In any case, liquid nails are not mentioned at the target, and anyone typing this in instead of adhesive seems to be looking for something else. Has some history, but has also been to RfD before (13 years ago). Utopes (talk / cont) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PanoramaMaker

There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modmin

No mention of this term at the target article. Almost assuredly has a plethora of other uses outside of... just Fark. The portmanteau of "mod" and "admin" is likely to come up in a number of other more relevant contexts related to moderation and administration. Cautiously though, this term has zero mentions on all Wikipedia, so I'm hesitant to just "retargeting and calling it good". Utopes (talk / cont) 06:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaImpression

No mention of MediaImpression at the target page. Neither this, nor "ArcSoft MediaImpression" are useful redirects in the article's current state, as we have no information at the stub for this subtopic. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Though I don't remember creating the ArcSoft MediaImpression redirect, checking the history confirms that it was in the article at that time but was later removed.
    Further checking backs up my guess that I most likely created it as an EXIF redirect for "software used".
    In order to address this issue that is causing you concern, I have updated the article to mention it.
    The redirect can now be left as-is or changed to ArcSoft#Products.
    Ubcule (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TotalMedia Theatre

No mention of TotalMedia or TotalMedia Theatre at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect as there is no content about this subtopic, and the stub for ArcSoft does not help enlighten readers here. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Godiva syndrome

Lady Godiva is never mentioned or referred to at the target article. Redirect a hyper-specific reference to an apparent synonym where it never is talked about is not very helpful. People looking for exhibitionism would have gotten to that point through just searching Exhibitionism. The current title might just be more helpful pointed at Lady Godiva, if anything, as the presence of a name within the title makes it seem like the name is the most defining aspect. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of imagination

A lack of imagination isn't an "argument from ignorance". It's not being able to imagine and doesn't have to do with arguments. If anything, it's Aphantasia. However, this has been a redirect here for the last 21 years. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baak (Telugu Film)

Indian films sometimes do this thing were they reshoot 10% or less of the film in another language. Either way, there is absolutely no need for this redirect when Baak (film) exists. only 10% or less of people interest seeing Aranmanai 4 will likely opt to see this version due to low key release. DareshMohan (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete: I think this is the same film as Baakghost. It looks like there is no point for this. Cleo Cooper (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: This is obviously linked with the Afd of Baakghost. Here too, I suggest to Keep the redirect (and then rename. Baak (Telugu film) if needed, and maybe ask for page protection. Like that, history can be kept and further work on the article is easier. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Baak (film) without redirect as the title has incorrect capitalization which is arguably an RDAB error. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swinging sticks

Lots of things involve swinging sticks, not just pendulums. The word "swing" nor the word "stick" appear ever at the target page, and can refer to basically anything from baseball to hockey to swordplay and beyond. I'd be hardpressed to think this would be a likely search term for this topic only. Sure, the pendulum may look like "sticks that swing", but the inference of it being a pendulum I believe is the most noteworthy aspect. This is one of the few technical topics that is prominent for its recognizable name and functionality, not just being "sticks that swing". Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Bundling with comment: Not to mention the singular version, which would otherwise literally be just, a pendulum. Not sure why it goes to the double variant. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supplemental Result

A topic not discussed at the target page, as "supple" nor "supplement" ever appear at the target page. Was BLAR'd in 2017 as being based on almost entirely unreliable sources, but does not serve its purpose as a good redirect if there is no content to be read about this at PageRank. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Google's Supplemental Results (technically still there - just not labeled as such) were not relevant to an article about the PageRank algorithm. Technically, the Supplemental Results are all the low-value content for which Google makes room available in its index, but they're not likely to be selected for competitive (high-interest) queries. Nor are the pages likely to be recrawled or refreshed very often. The only real connection anyone from Google ever confirmed was that these types of pages usually had very little PageRank. It would be more appropriate to redirect the page to the article about Google and add something there, assuming a suitable resource could be found (probably one of Danny Sullivan's articles from Search Engine Land from around 2006-2010). Michael Martinez (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strike Force Entertainment

Neither "strike" nor "force" is listed at the target article, giving this title insufficient context as a redirect to the target article. There is no dedicated information on Wikipedia to this sub label. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strike fingering

"Strike" not mentioned at the target either, and Cut fingering was recently deleted. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split Rectangle

No mention of a rectangle at the target article. And as per the box, no piece of geometry is getting split at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split Box

"Box" never appears at the target article, and certainly not splitting one. The only few mentions of "split" at the target are in reference to Viacom's. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soquid

A neologism portmanteau of a "solid liquid". Picked up by Wendy's, but not mentioned at target, and totally not an all encompassing term for a Frosty, especially for a term representing a space between two distinct phases of matter. See Quasi-solid / Semisolid. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solowheel

Targets the manufacturers section, but solowheel is not listed as a manufacturer of electric unicycles at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snaf

Was created as a non-notable slang term that was instantly BLAR'd, same-day reverted, and reverted back to a redirect yet again. Seems to have no business targeting the pieces of paper left behind after you hole-punch something. I never knew that these had a name, so there you go! Learn something new every day I guess, Wikipedia for you. There was Chav and Chad (slang) that were all in the mix around here, but as this is suitably short and not mentioned there or anywhere in this realm, it doesn't seem of use to keep this redirect around. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shuggie

No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shoob

This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I have the redirect target on my watchlist and the term "Shoob" has been added there many times without sources. Graham87 (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shoo-in

No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shman

No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Dio

No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, he does. He appears as a secret boss in Heritage for the Future. Hansen SebastianTalk 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The target article is Dio Brando, not Heritage for the Future. The word "shadow" bears no mention on Dio's page. I'm neutral on retargeting to the video game if he appears as a secret boss, although the only mention on that page is a list entry. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    shadow DIO (case sensitive) is a playable character (not a boss, that'd be DIO (still case sensitive) with his jacket) in hftf, so i'd say redirect there cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sexy flash

Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self loading freight

Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scrmable

Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete No reason to have this particular example of transposed letters be a redirect. MartinPoulter (talk) 14:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scranton lax

No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: We mention they have a facility that they use for lacrosse a regulation-size field for men's and women's soccer which also can be used for other sports such as lacrosse and they do have both men and women's lacrosse. So improving the article would be fine; but there's no reason to delete this redirect even as-is. Skynxnex (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Scocco

No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific sexism

"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes (talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scary sharp

No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Rocks

No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ali O'Shea and etc.

A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will note, for navigation purposes, the titles in this nomination are sorted from oldest at the top and newest at the bottom. Some of the older titles do have a light history, but none of the newer ones do (i.e. nothing after the year 2008 has any history). And for those that do have history, a good chunk have either been through an AfD, are so minor that they were redirected in various short periods of time, or both. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanju Bhagat

No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samlor mcheu

No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S from Hell

No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rute Gunnay

No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rush (Leland Remix)

No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RTV News Inc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roshutsu

Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ross and Rachel (song)

No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roses (SoMo song)

  • Roses (SoMo song) → SoMo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: (@subpage) ] 

No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romantic Homicide (Jaden Hossler song)

No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wiki English. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete I know where it's supposed to be, it's a song of his, but it didn't chart anywhere and fails WP:NSONG. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rockman 4 Minus Infinity

This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    As the creator of this redirect: I was planning on adding content about the ROM hack to the article when I had time, but it slipped my mind. I do think it is notable enough for at least a brief mention, with several articles about it on the internet. [2], [3] [4] Also, as a well-known hack, it is a plausible search term, and it's mentioned in multiple other pages on WP, which makes it a useful redirect to have.
    I do agree that it's awkward that it's not mentioned at the target page - would it help if I just used these sources to add a brief summary of what the hack is to the article? I'm not super familiar with the exact policies here, so if I'm misunderstanding something, I apologize. HappyWith (talk) 06:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rkkody

No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Keep. He is actually mentioned. According to CBS News this was Chuck Humphrey's cult name. Humphrey is mentioned here. I could add a mention this was his name in the group, if you'd like? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Riksenergi

No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redwop

No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recursive X-Y cut

No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be its own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes (talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rail transport in Socotra

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes (talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rail transport in X is one of those topics we have myriad links for for historical (cultural?) reasons, unlike horse plane and spaceships. Suspect this is one of those. I lean towards delete, but not strongly. CMD (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my arguments in the previous discussion. This is misleading due to the target not discussing this topic. -- Tavix (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete - Per nom. I find it a bit funny for such a redirect to exist, especially because this island has literally no infrastructure Abo Yemen✉ 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete Per nom, the existence of the redirect implies the existence of something that just isn't there. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 06:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This island barely has road infrastructure let alone rail. This redirect implies the existence of that which does not exist. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rail Sim Pro

No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Inns

No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R@ygold

No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum realm

Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I read a lot of QM and "realm" is not common. Johnjbarton (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Johnjbarton. As a professional QCD physicist, I can affirm that physicists are not keen on the word realm, tending to describe areas in real or abstract spaces as regions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I'm also a physicist, specialized in quantum information. The expression "quantum realm" is exceedingly rare. Let Marvel have it. Tercer (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget: hatnote might be tricky since it's a paragraph in the middle of a section but something makes sense or even just a mention and link of quantum mechanics in the prose. Skynxnex (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 24

Sucking peepee

I think the title makes it obvious why. Yes, it's technically pointing to the correct page, but seriously. I doubt "Sucking peepee" is really an encyclopedic redirect to have. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Redirects are allowed to be "unencyclopedic". This is an unambiguous redirect, so it's valid. Fieari (talk) 23:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Being a comprehensible synonym isn't sufficient grounds to include an expression. Yes, redirects are cheap—very cheap—but that doesn't mean we need to go Full Neelix and include every possible comprehensible synonym that no one would ever use. If there are actually instances of people searching for this, I'd be fine with it; but are there? Google Trends says no. (That one spike today is me just checking.) Please delete this, before someone decides that if this works, then so does hoovering hoohaa, lapping labia, tonguing twat, and savoring snatch, none of which are on Google Trends.[citation needed] (Actually, I didn't bother to check; but wouldn't it be something if one of them *is* on Trends, whereas sucking peepee is not? Then what are we gonna do?) Mathglot (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Mathglot. Can successfully get to this target from a plethora of different searches, including but not limited to, Google. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Unlikely/unhelpful search terms. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter dick

Not sure this is a plausible typo (or what people would expect when searching this term, so it's worse than having nothing). Previously was discussed (and deleted) at RfD and no one suggested this target. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Delete - Clearly violates WP:LEAST... this is very much and obviously not what someone would be looking for when searching for this term, and I don't think we have the actual information that this term refers to, so... since we don't have it, delete it. (if someone finds the actual information on wikipedia or wiktionary, please change my !vote to redirect there instead, but I'm at work so I can't search this right now) Fieari (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Implausible typo and is not what I'd expect if I were to, for whatever silly reason, search this term. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of lists

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

From previous discussions (in 2013 and 2016), three pages have come up as potential valid redirect targets for this page, List of lists of lists, Wiki: Contents/Lists, and Category:Lists.

The current target, List of lists of lists, is in the same namespace, but it's not a complete "list of lists" as not all lists on Wikipedia are listed in "Lists of X" articles, and it's a "list of lists of lists" rather than a direct "list of lists." Next, Wiki: Contents/Lists has an approachable format and it's a "list of lists" rather than a "list of lists of lists," but it is also incomplete. And finally, Category:Lists is a complete "list of lists," but it's a category.

I propose that a disambiguation page be created containing these three pages as they all have their pros and cons, making none of them suitable as the sole redirect target. – BrandonXLF (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and hatnote the other two. Jay 💬 11:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, local targets are preferred when feasible. I don't see the issue with the current target; it need not be complete. I don't think someone searching this is going to be misled or confused by where they end up. -- Tavix (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Striped Tiger (band)

Target was redirected to a different subject per an AfD so is no longer about a band. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but we could mention it at the target in which can I would favour keeping. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Netflix films no longer mentioned

The titles of these Netflix original films are no longer mentioned in their target. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:301D:BAB0:803F:CEE (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars™

with the deletion of Peppa Pig TM, this probably also deserves a discussion in the same vain. Okmrman (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete no one is going to go out of their way to try and get the special characters for TM to search for that when Star Wars would have come up by then anyway. Canterbury Tail talk 19:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete™ per Canterbury Tail, implausible search term. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete™ per this being Totally Bogus Dude™
    also did you mean "vein" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete™. Useless. Cleo Cooper (talk) 03:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larissa Hodge

Not discussed at target with sufficient substance to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Bundled with other similar redirects.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Larissa Hodge, we have information on this person and it's found at this target. It doesn't matter that it's very little information - this is what we have and that's where it is. Delete the others as they are unsourced alternates and nicknames and also not described at the target. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Larissa Hodge is shown as her contestant name Bootz which is referred to as Larissa Aurora in another section of the article. So I'm not on board with the logic of keeping one but not the other. Jay 💬 12:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ductal

Ductal is a product of Lafarge but isn't mentioned on the article at all. The redirect exists due to a 2015 deletion discussion of the article [7], I believe a redirect to duct would be better given ductal is the adjectivial form of duct. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirected via an AFD, no longer mentioned in the article ... it's time. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just added mention. Brother of the subject - refine to the #Early life section. If kept, Comedy Shorts Gamer which is protected, may also be recreated as a redirect. Jay 💬 12:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: The "added mention" Jay is referring to spells the subject as "ComedyShortsGamer" (no spaces). Stating this for editors to be able to find the mention, otherwise I have no opinion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National culture

"National culture" is mentioned on the target page, but it isn't a subhead, and this seems to me to be a strange article to redirect this to. I'm not sure someone who searches for "national culture" will understand why they're on this page. I'm not excited about any of the alternatives I considered (Nationalism?), maybe someone here has a better idea? asilvering (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technofascism and Techno-fascism

Same terminology, different meanings. Does its meaning depend on the absence/presence of the hyphen, or can it have both meanings either way? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • My thought exactly. Either it is a term legitimately attested to in the literature, or else it is POV and should be deleted. Which of these it is, I will leave to smarter contributors than myself – the top Google “hit” points to one of the target Wikipedia articles and the second one points to this RfD itself! (and subsequent “hits” point to academic articles that are way “above my head.”) Bwrs (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    did some looking around and "technofascism" apparently means "fascism that uses technology", not "fascism in technology", so both of those are wrong
    either retarget them to fascism or a more fitting target, or cause them to mysteriously disappear delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I imagined "technofascism" being a portmanteau of technocracy and fascism (with the former referring to governance by experts, not technology itself) and that it would refer to a blend of both. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (film)

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The F-Bomb (film)

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      "The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (movie)

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: 2x (edit conflict)
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki: FLUFF

Should have the same target as MOS:PUFFERY. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio

Delete as inaccurate and implausible. The abortion was performed in Indiana, not Ohio. -- Tavix (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @Jax 0677: Why? WP:CHEAP doesn't explain why this redirect should be kept, it explains the general state of redirects. That's why you'll rarely see others cite it at RfD, it doesn't say anything in particular. Instead, it'd be more helpful to explain why you created it and why it may be a useful redirect, despite being inaccurate. -- Tavix (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Reply - Some people do not know that the abortion was performed in Indiana. Additionally, the redirect is not blocking any other article from being created. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Also see this discussion: https://www.duhoctrungquoc.vn/wiki/en/Wiki:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_5#10-year-old_Ohio_rape_victim_required_to_cross_state_lines_to_obtain_abortion Okmrman (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Searching this term is entirely plausible, as the title lends itself to potential confusion by mentioning both Ohio and Indiana. TNstingray (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is fine. Someone searching for this term will find out the facts of the case. BD2412 T 02:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a search engine, redirects should not be accommodating inaccurate keywords cobbled together into a never-before-seen title. As the abortion was not performed in Ohio, this cannot be an alternative name for the subject. Typing this into the search bar is far more insightful than maintaining this as a redirect, as readers will see the correct title and realize "Ah, it was the Indiana abortion case; the abortion was not performed in Ohio". This redirect currently causes confusion and presents a faulty equalization that a Ohio-abortion case = Indiana-abortion case, as there's no mention of a "Ohio-abortion misconception" or anything that would imply such a misconception. The redirect in question does not appear written at the target page (as it's untrue), nor does it appear anywhere on Wikipedia (as it's untrue). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Redirects don't have to be mentioned in the article; there is no requirement for that. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        I never said that being mentioned is a requirement. Thousands don't, probably. But not being mentioned, heck, not even ever alluded to, absolutely demolishes any of the little motivation for keeping misleading information in the form of a redirect void-of-context. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible – though apparently not popular – search term, because not everyone is going to remember where the abortion physically happened. It sounds like the concern is that some editors parse the title as meaning that Ohio was the location of the abortion, rather than the (usual) location of the child – i.e., that "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio" is equal to "2022 abortion performed in Ohio on a 10-year-old" and is factually inaccurate, but "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old from Ohio" would be accurate. I see their point, but I think that asking for grammatical perfection in a redirect is not necessary. The point of a redirect is to get people to the article that contains the accurate facts, and this will achieve that goal. Just as I think the incorrect hyphenation is not a good reason to delete a redirect, I think the suboptimal preposition isn't a good reason to delete it. Also, it looks like an RM during the first weeks of the article's existence introduced the "in Ohio" idea. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      "Plausible, but not very popular" is a wild misrepresentation of the fundamental facts. This makes the assumption that A: writing a backwards, incorrect, non-existent / Google search prompt is "plausible", and B: a grand total of zero views with the last 12 months is "apparently not popular"... "Apparently"?? Even with the clunky overly-specific and still somehow incorrect title out of the way, was there a world that this title was even going to get a view? No, it's completely unnatural and would be expected to exist by zero people on Wiki English. If you ask 100 people to describe the case in 30 different ways, I'm nearly positive that this title wouldn't appear ever, much less make the shortlist for likely and useful redirects. This is a search term, not worthy of a redirect. Search terms as redirects are a horrible precedent as is, as there's literally infinite search terms in existence and not worthwhile to entertain as long as Wikipedia has a build-in search box that captures every single variety, and everything I've tried has led to 100% accurate results as long as the text exists.
      And yet, with all of those tests, there are thousands of theoretical implausible search-term-redirects that could (and don't) exist. And all of the thousands would be far better options that 2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio in its current state, as it's literally a lie. On the chance that this is naturally typed into Wikipedia, with someone asking themselves "was this abortion in Indiana or Ohio?", they get a wrong answer. Why click further? The title implies the events already, and the implication is simply untrue. There's like 30+ other redirects currently here that capture every reasonable (and unreasonable) outcome, this untruth variant is simply not necessary. It's harmful and confusing and deletable per WP:RDEL #2. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Wikipedia is not Google, and even if it was, the redirect is still inaccurate. DrowssapSMM 13:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inaccurate and implausible search term. TarnishedPathtalk 09:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Wikipedia is not a search engine StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - search term with enough relevant facts to identify the target, and catches searches where the reader doesn't know (or care) which particular state the specific events occurred in. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      So does this mean that as long as a redirect is 80% correct, it doesn't matter if the remaining 20% is wrong/misleading because 80 is still a passing grade? There's an infinite number of 100% correct titles out there, I feel we should be focusing on redirecting those rather than phrases that are 90% or 80% or 70% correct; "close enough" isn't enough to redirect (the search bar solves all of those problems). Utopes (talk / cont) 17:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Yes, that's exactly what it means. A redirect is meant to get readers to the information they're looking for, not penalize them for not already knowing certain specific (and to non-Americans, largely irrelevant) details of an event. Unless we have many articles on American children being sexually assaulted and then forced to travel to a different state for critical medical care that's denied to them in their home states for stupid religious reasons, "close enough" is just that: close enough. Taking them to the information they're obviously looking for is clearly better than taking them to an error message. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          Okay... so throwing a hodgepodge of accurate enough words in a title gives one freedom to fill the remaining 20% with lies, I guess? Maybe nobody outside of America cares about the details and whether the abortion was in Indiana or Tennessee or Alaska or on the moon. Having unexplained lies in a title is inherently confusing, given that the 30 other ~implausible redirects that were created to this article are going to autofill here first. "Details being irrelevant" and "true accuracy doesn't matter" isn't just a pandora's box, it's a crushing typhoon of redirection malpractice. What error message would people see? The search results?? That's where readers go for 99.9% of the infinite search terms out there anyway. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible search term. Frank Anchor 20:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because often times you don't see the redirection header when viewing the article; hence, such incorrect redirects may cause confusion. Bwrs (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (documentary)

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep to be consistent with the The F-Bomb (documentary) redirect, which the nom (correctly) fixed last week. Jay 💬 04:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      "The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 07:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The F-Bomb (movie)

Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dulah, California

Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The page was partially merged. I've made an attribution notice in an edit summary at the target to avoid attribution issues in case the page does get deleted. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I redirected the page because I merged content to Solimar Beach and redirects are cheap. The only other reason to keep the redirect is that if you search for the Solimar Beach community in GNIS, the only entry that comes up is Dulah; that's the only reason I started an article under Dulah in the first place, since Solimar Beach is used on local signage and I started the article way back when I assumed GNIS was reliable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak restore article (per WP:PROD, can be taken to AfD if desired), but could this name not be added to the current target? As things stand this is confusing for someone searching this. A7V2 (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a {{r from merge}} to maintain proper attribution. We can revisit the redirect if that situation changes. - Eureka Lott 02:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonia Ulpia Traiana

In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected to Xanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section to Vetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pinging JoNeuen: Instead of reverting the redirect, please discuss here why you think the current redirect target is incorrect and where you think the page should redirect to. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I have proposed this on the Xanten page. The reason for reverting is that Colonia Ulpia Traiana is an archaeological/historical site, which is only briefly discussed in the Xanten article. JoNeuen (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi there! So, the link to Vetera was made because I created this article myself. As with Colonia Ulpia Traiana, the Vetera article was redirecting to Xanten before, but I cancelled it because I was working on a translation from the German article. I considered this justified, because I didn't get a response on the Xanten talk page in over a week. Since translating and complementing articles using translation is what I mostly do here, my intention is to do the same with Colonia Ulpia Traiana. The Xanten page is already considered incomplete and these German pages are full of valuable historic and archaeological information that might benefit English speaking Wiki English. JoNeuen (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • How about restoring this version? The editor in question was a suspected sock, but the article was neither deleted nor the edits hidden for socking. Jay 💬 17:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Strongly oppose doing that. It wasn't deleted because there was a pre-sock version to revert to. It wasn't revdelled because that's generally not done. We don't reward socking like that. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2021 Wiki Foundation's actions in Chinese Wikipedia

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Culture Jam (mixtape)

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kawaii Leonard

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a plausible typo, especially given the similarly pronounced Japanese term "Kawaii." The fact that no page links to this title is irrelevant, as it is reasonable for a person to search for this term. Frank Anchor 14:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible typo pbp 16:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible typo, adding two unique letters and taking away one. Leonard nor his name do not have any affinity towards romanji. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Plausible typo, especially for those familiar with the spelling of Hawaii. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeBron Jim

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redirect creator (though I oppose a G7 speedy). While "Jim" is a common abbreviation for the given name "James", it does not appear to translate the same way for the surname, thus making the redirect more unnecessary than I thought when creating it in 2009. Frank Anchor 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Jim. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible to a point where it could plausibly refer to someone else. Steel1943 (talk) 03:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeOld LeBald Le4and6

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Frank Anchor 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A variety of Le____ have been used to refer to LeBron James and nominator hasn't demonstrating any harm in this redirect existing. There are reasons other than typos for redirects existing and therefore nomination hasn't met deletion criteria. pbp 15:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Who is going to search "LeOld LeBald Le4and6" to find LeBron James? Someone just put together three random nicknames that are used to mock him, what is the point of having this? Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom + disparaging nickname. Not every string of three vaguely plausible nicknames deserve a redirect, and there isn't evidence for these three specifically being found together as a nickname. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, absolutely useless and beyond unlikely to use this title to reach one of the most recognized athletes of all time. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nba allstar 2007 mvp

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ceiling is the roof

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is a quote from Jordan [8], but it is not mentioned so the redirect is unhelpful. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As noted above, was a quote from Jordan. Nominator seems to have nominated NBA-related redirects en masse and doesn't seem to understand redirect rules. pbp 15:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The quote is from Jordan, but is it particularly relevant to have a redirect? Also it's never mentioned in Jordan's article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        From what I've seen so far, the nominator understands the rules perfectly well. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an unmentioned quote. Nothing about "ceilings" nor "roofs" ever is discussed at the target page. There is no context as to what this quote is, who said it, or why it's a redirect there (or what part of the page it is pertinent to). Michael Jordan is one of the greatest athletes of all time, so anyone that wants to reach his page can easily do so through his name or the 20 other redirects that point here. Making a conscious decision to type in "the ceiling is a roof" implies that searchers are looking for a specific topic, and such a topic is not covered at the target article or anywhere on Wiki English. Its existence misleads readers into a wild goose chase to find non-existent material. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No mention on the page, no demonstrated relevance, not Wikiquote.—Bagumba (talk) 10:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God's team

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete This phrase appears to come from a quote by Sergio Ramos which is mentioned in the article. I don't think that's enough to warrant a redirect, but I could be convinced otherwise if there is evidence that this is a more common nickname. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and definitely don't keep, as a vague and unhelpful term that would be more suitable for any other topic related to god and a team from a religious sense. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: whilst they have been referred to as this at least once, I imagine a bunch of other sports teams will also have been referred to as this, as the term is vague. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Taylor Swift

Pointless redirect from a supposed draft article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - totally pointless for inclusion and drafts are rarely or not at all linked on any articles on Wiki English. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (and delete the extra text): Actually, Swan, drafts do redirect to the articles once they get approved, that's a regular part of the process. In this case, it was out of process, because the draft was created in 2019 for an article that exists since 2006. However, having a "draft:article" redirecting to "article" is commonplace by now across the encyclopedia, so there's hardly a point in deleting this. Cambalachero (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:SRE, this is the standard way of dealing with these. There is no benefit to deleting, but there is benefit in avoiding RFD discussions for them. Extra text should be deleted and then the page should be tagged with Template:R from Draft. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC (talk) 17:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Cambalachero's explanation. This was never a viable draft, so it should have been deleted instead of redirected. -- Tavix (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is not an WP:RDRAFT. The draft was created 13 years after the fact (in 2019) and never should have existed. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep ... ish. Someone created a draft under this redirect prior to it being nominated. If need be, disable the redirect and then send this to WP:MFD. Steel1943 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Kev

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. It is the most common nickname for him, but dates back to the 1970s. Anyone looking for him would surely be aware of his name and just type that. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep If It is the most common nickname for him as Crowsus asserts, then it should be added to the article. I don't see how this would be an implausible search term in that case. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Presidentman, navigationally useful. Nickname should be sourced and added to article. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's a valid nickname for him. "It's from the 1970s" doesn't make it less valid as a search term. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven of Hearts

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not included in this article and the section name after the # does not even exist any more. However, there are external links which has that but since Eleven of Hearts is more than one entity [9], it is best served as it's own article, subject to notability, excluding the Gareth Bale trademark celebration. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Di

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unnatural and unexpected chopping of first and last name, would not be searched and would not discourage readers from finding the main page. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regordinho

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete Also a possibly insulting redirect: "regordinho" is Portuñol for "very fat" (literally), which is a play on Ronaldinho (similarly pronounced). Bedivere (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originaldo

No page links here, also an implausible misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. Nickname as reference to disambiguate from Cristiano Ronaldo.Homei (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yes it could be used to disambiguate him from Cristiano Ronaldo, but it should be a widely known nickname I think, like "R9" for example. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unmentioned, unsupported portmanteau of a nickname. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Marradonna

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The King of Football

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The lead states that He was nicknamed O Rei (The King). There are multiple people with this nickname in various fields (see, e.g., Elvis Presley or Richard Petty), so "The King of Football" is a plausible disambiguator. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A word in a different language that translates to "King", does not equate being designated as the ruler of the entire sport, i.e. the translation + "of football". No evidence in the article that this player is considered the king of football, and all around an ambiguous search term as this varies depending on who you ask. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cant see me move

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, "you can't see me move" is not a phrase mentioned at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Seena

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. Homei (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, this is a reasonable phonetic attempt. -- Tavix (talk) 01:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, overtly on the nose with 2+ errors, can be easily found without this redirect and we shouldn't be replacing "ce" with "see". Utopes (talk / cont) 07:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scorsesi

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Plausible misspelling pbp 15:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. Homei (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scorsezi

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cris Ron

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ronaldo

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the subject is not called Chris, and there is no mention of "Chris " in the target article's prose. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rehan ronaldo

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The World's Top Goal Scorer 2011

No mainspace page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Corey Perry. Delete, there are other sports that also have top goal scorers. -- Tavix (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not Google, this is not how we do redirects. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Messidona

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. If found via Internet search, clarifies that it refers to Messi (and not Maradona). Homei (talk) 20:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, was going to delete based on being an implausible and unmentioned nickname, but after Homei's explanation my deletion is stronger, as this is now also an WP:XY situation with Maradona, and can understandably apply to either target due to incorporating both players' names equally. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Messimagician

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as Messimagician isn't mentioned at the target. Nobody would type this in after having already typed out "Messi", which redirects to Lionel already. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LM19

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP. Homei (talk) 20:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no mention and no indication that this is a plausible alternative nickname of the subject, based on the content of the article. Anything can be an abbreviation, but in this format it seems unlikely. Messi is one of the most well known athletes of all time, and can be found easily. This redirect is not supported by content, as we have nothing to say about "LM19". Utopes (talk / cont) 07:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joever

Per WP:SSRT. Do we really need to include such 4-chan internet slang with no encyclopedic value, a "word" not used in any articles? Fram (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Weak keep as creator per WP:CHEAP. Duckmather (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    it's not joever til it's joever, and that entry is goated with the sauce
    ...apologies for whatever that was, and for the somewhat hidden pun. keep as there are sources cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Seuss Enterprises

Company not mentioned at target. Should be tagged as {{R without mention}} if kept. CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It's mentioned in these articles. Nightscream (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, not because of incoming links (as those don't matter if there's nothing to show for it at the target), but keep because "Enterprises" is mentioned at the article, at least in March '24. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kannagi (upcoming film)

This film released just about 4 months ago and is no longer upcoming. Plenty of time has past to the point that there is no more confusion for a 2023 movie, as it's well into 2024 now. Nobody ending up here who sees "upcoming film" in the title would be surprised by it's removal for a movie releasing last year. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete per nom. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 06:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phone computer

This seems overly technical. Nobody would really refer to smartphones as a phone computer outside of drawing some comparisons between smartphones and computers. Okmrman (talk) 04:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is what a smartphone is, and I wouldn't be surprised if the terms were used before "smartphone" became the established term (I can't check as Google is refusing to show me results that are both verbatim and before a given time, and either one alone is overwhelmed by irrelevant results where the two words happen to be adjacent, especially in lists in adverts). Thryduulf (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment shouldn't this actually link to telco equipment? Such as a PBX or other phone computers -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The phrasing of these redirects makes me believe they could also refer to Modem, thus making these redirects ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I reaffirm my "delete" per Ivanvector's comment: A disambiguation page would not be the solution since none of the subjects mentioned so far are title matches. Let Wikipedia search do its job instead. Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I think it is easy for English first speakers (or young people) to say they aren't needed, but they probably serve some utility and they perfectly describe what they are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify. As Steel mentioned, a viable interpretation of this would be Modem, being "a phone used by a computer". However, I'd also think that VoIP phone-- a phone that uses the Internet instead of normal phone lines-- or softphone-- a software program that could call other people, which could be downloaded and installed on a PC-- would be valid interpretations of "Phone computer" or "Computer phone". Given I'm sure none of the above- including Smartphone (a phone which is a computer)-- would be a primary target, dabification is warranted. edited at 14:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - disambiguation pages are for topics that have the same title, not for manually compiled search indexes of possibly related keywords. We have a search engine for that, let it do its job. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: One more go…
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial haiti

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Side-dump condola

Not a likely typo (the correctly spelled phrase is side dump gondola which has existed as a redirect for a decade). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


April 23

Format string

Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps (talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • disamig per nom -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move %d to Format specifiers. Retarget Format string to Format specifiers. Jay 💬 16:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A fleshed out Disambig would make sense, but I don't see a disambig as called for just between printf and scanf. Unix manuals and technical manuals are always referring to Printf Format Strings (which are used by many tools), when the word Format String is used, but it's exceptionally rare to find anything other than C manuals referring to scanf strings. The concept of a Format String is a much broader topic, and there are many other kinds of format strings that could be discussed besides the C stdio library - such as strftime strings, Awk, Python f-strings, .Net Format strings , etc. Scanf is a specialization of printf - these two redirect targets would be referring to the same subject matter and Printf and Scanf should link to each other (or a common topic) anyway, regarding the discussion of Format strings, because Scanf format strings are Printf format strings with some additions, removals, and a change of interpretation. The current Scanf article doesn't really address how Scanf formats are different and unique from Printf strings, For example the %[ or %* syntax for strings such as %80[^\n] are not laid out. That is not really an issue.. I would not expect either of the Printf and Scanf articles on Wikipedia to serve as a technical manual or programming tutorial for these functions. I would think it should suffice to have a discussion on what format strings are for Printf and Scanf in one place, and Link to the official BSD or GNU C library's documentation. I say Printf, because the printf article has the better discussion of Format specifiers, and Scanf's is limited, except where they link to the Printf article --Mysidia (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Mysidia: Well, since as you correctly said "format string" is a more general topic than C's printf/scanf and we currently don't cover it anywhere, we should delete per WP:REDYES, no? Then an article that covers all the contexts format strings can appear in should be written at format string. Nickps (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to free space for an article per user:Nickps. The idea is present in many APIs (not just languages, C and Python include, for example, strftime/strptime/datetime with their own format specifiers, etc.). It is relatively easy to find non-language-specific sources of good quality. --Викидим (talk) 22:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Format specifiers

Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps (talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Disambig or move?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DZHH-AM

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thermodynamics of nanostructures

The redirect should be deleted. The name of the page was an error, it appears that an editor thought that Thermodynamics was short for Thermal dynamics which it is not. The page has been changed to the more appropriate title Thermal transport in nanostructures. The redirect is incorrect, as it is not on thermodynamics, so would take readers in the wrong direction. I cannot find an actual page on thermodynamics in nanostructures, so it should be removed for the moment. Ldm1954 (talk) 04:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for now as an {{R from move}}, unless the phrase clashes with another topic. The article has used the former title for almost ten years and may become hard to find without the redirect. ― Synpath 21:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Please note that the old name is misleading -- that should matter most. The science clashes. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:32, 10 18 March 2024 (UTC)
      N.B., the redirect is comparable to having a redirect from "Star" "Satellite" to "Milky Way" -- misleading without rationale. Please check the article content. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm not sure how misleading the redirect really is. As far as I understand, the physics of thermal transport would be a subset of thermodynamics. If I'm hopelessly wrong there, then sure, it might be harmful enough to delete. Even then, I don't think that this is wholly unreasonable thing to be mistaken about (hence a useful redirect).
        Regardless, deleting the redirect would break several internal links, which are easy to fix, but one should do that ahead of deletion. External links might exist as well, but that's more difficult to assess. I'd say that the redirect should be left alone for a month or three to see if it becomes unused. If that is established then it may make sense to revisit deleting this, but it still seems WP:CHEAP to keep around. ― Synpath 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          Sorry, but yup, you are very wrong. Thermal transport is exactly what it says, how heat via vibrations (phonons) or electrons is transmitted from one place to another, for instance compare copper to an insulator such as glass wool. The topic is relevant as it changes at the nanoscale.
          Thermodynamics is all about what phase you have and how it varies with composition, temperature, pressure, gas environment etc. For instance why you can melt ice by adding salt to it, the solution freezes at a much lower temperature. Thermodynamics at the nanoscale is important, but has nothing to do with heat transfer. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Thermal transport is akin to ocean heating or magma flow. Thermodynamics is the (theoretical) study of ergodic systems with a large number of particles and the conservation of energy. It would seem the original article was created with a typo in the title; its pointless to preserve typos. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was moved two weeks back. Internal incoming links need to be fixed first per Synpath. Jay 💬 15:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: All incoming links bypassed or removed. This discussion can now be relisted to determine what to do with this redirect. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: This will be the last relist.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete Thermal dynamics and thermodynamics are not the same thing. The article is very much not about thermodynamics of nanostructures (which would be how their properties change with temperature, pressure, energy, etc. at the statistical level), but about how heat moves between things. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irreducible manifold

These should point at the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Fort Blakely and Spanish Fort

WP:XY, Battle of Spanish Fort is a separate article; both battles/forts are mentioned in both articles, so there is no obvious target, and Battle of Spanish Fort occurred first, making the order confusing. Moreover, Fort Blakeley is misspelled. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hulks

The characters have no plural form, so should we retarget to Hulk (disambiguation), soft redirect to wiktionary:hulks, or delete? 176.42.16.148 (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Druggie

For possible deletion, or maybe a redirect to a page which discusses the slur rather than the addiction. Note that this initially redirected to Substance dependence; I changed it to the current redirect to fit with drug addict GnocchiFan (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of appommatox courthouse

The misspelling combined with the miscapitalization make this not very useful. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Keep "Courthouse" and "Court House" are variant spellings, and it isn't too surprising that someone would type it in lowercase. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep per Enby's initial opinion on lowercase and spacing. Appomattox/Appommatox swaps the doubled characters with m for t, so isn't an unreasnable misspelling, as this isn't a common word. Tag {{R from misspelling}} -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dextette

i thought it was a peachette deal, but it's not even that. two characters in the gen 3 anime refer to the pokédex as that sometimes maybe probably, and that's as far as it seems to go cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boulder Badge

that's brock's badge, for context. not notable on its own, aside from how boring it looks, and this probably wouldn't be the right target anyway cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aku Type

what cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    i did some looking, and it's a word in some languages, and could refer to the fire, water, electric, and dark types, given some mental gymnastics, but it's mostly an informal-ish first person pronoun. no idea what basis i think this should be deleted on, but i want this gone cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokédex (Sinnoh)

retarget to the list of gen 4 pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment The Sinnoh Pokédex doesn't only include Gen 4 pokémon, but it isn't unlikely that someone would be looking for these specifically when typing it. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full Pokedex

retarget to the list of pokémon or delete, this ain't the full pokédex cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Retarget, as that is what a reader would likely expect. ("Full Pokedex" not even having a mention there.) CitationsFreak (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bird Pokémon

not sure if this is referring to bird pokémon (like corviknight and the worse corviknight), in which case i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon or delete (more so delete) or to the unused bird type, in which case redirect to missingno without a second or first thought cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Legendary Pokémon

i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon, even though it's a list of all the pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weather Legendary Pokémon

i'd say retarget to kyogre, as it's the first in the weather trio cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Master

is this really the best place to target, as opposed to pokémon masters ex? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Crystal Health Items list

not a list of health items (whatever that's supposed to mean), or focused specifically on crystal cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legendary Pokémon

maybe retarget to the list of pokémon as with mythical pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hazeltown

This is not attested anywhere, and its addition to the article was solely referenced to the article's "version history". 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just added a {{cn}} at the target. The article was titled Hazeltown and mention has been there right from the first edit in 2008 - Keep as long as the mention is there. Jay 💬 13:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: any thoughts on keeping the redrect?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete due to lack of attestation; just because something has been there since 2008 doesn't mean it's right. (Of course, just because something cannot be cited doesn't mean it isn't true - but it does mean we should exclude it and the redirect from Wikipedia until we're 100% sure). --GnocchiFan (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Province of Bessarabia

Nonsense redirects. Bessarabia is a region in Eastern Europe. Budjak is a subset of it. Super Ψ Dro 12:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget both to Bessarabia Governorate. "Province" appears to be an alternative translation (see [10], [11], etc.) - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      In both links you gave province is not capitalized, there is no proper names but a descriptive combination of words. There was also Bessarabia Governorate (Romania) by the way. We could disambiguate but I see it as really unnecessary. Also, come on, The Province of Bessarabia is completely implausible, it should be deleted. Super Ψ Dro 23:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Does it matter if it's not capitalized in the specific sources I found? It will still be a plausible search term. I thought about disambiguation, but I think the hatnote at the proposed target is sufficient. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think the key word in the nominating statement is: "is". Bessarabia is a larger region in Eastern Europe. However, it appears that it was a smaller Turkish province/governate/eyalet, from the late 15th century through the early 19th century. Here's the article as it stood before being redirected in 2005:

    The Province of Bessarabia or Besarabya pashalyk in Turkish, was an Ottoman province from 1478 to 1812. Its size varied, however by 1600, it included the towns of Cetatea Alba, Izmail, Tighina, and Kilia.
    The Ottoman Province of Bassarabia was annexed by the Russian Empire in 1812, along with all Moldovan territory east of the Prut river, which the Russians governed jointly in one single Russian province of Bessarabia.
    The Ottoman Province, only, is more or less the same size as the territory of modern-day Bugeac, which is currently part of the Ukrainian Odessa oblast.

    This is uncited but sounds plausible, and it aligns with the bit in Budjak#Name and geography (i.e., the redirect's target) that uses the name historic Bessarabia. There are sources such as this 1927 book (about the Russian annexation of the province) and this 2019 book (about ethnicity, but summarizing the pre-Russian state, in which Bessarabia was vaguely delimited but generally congruent with Budjak), and "province"+"bessarabia"&pg=PA59&printsec=frontcover this book (which confirms Izmail was part of the province of Bessarabia when the Russians took the province from the Ottomans, before they gave it to Moldovia) that verify at least parts of it. At any rate, though I'm unfamiliar with the history of this area, it appears that it's not "nonsense", but merely a detail of history that is not widely known. Consequently, we should probably keep this redirect, and probably improve the target article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Retarget to Bessarabia given the ambiguity of several historical provinces being named "Bessarabia". Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moldavia Province, Ottoman Empire

The Principality of Moldavia was never a "province" of the Ottoman Empire. It was never a part of the empire. It always remained a separate country with its own laws and administration under vassalage. These redirects are inaccurate and misleading. Also the "Bogdan/Bogdania/Boğdan" redirects are made up original research. Super Ψ Dro 12:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Moldavia Province and Boğdan Province Referred to as such in several books (on "Moldavia," see [12], [13], [14], etc.) (on "Boğdan," see [15] and [16]). Cannot find references for the others, so delete. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I do not see why should we keep blatantly inaccurate redirects. Moldavia (known in Turkish as Boğdan) was never a formal part of the Ottoman Empire, much less something organized into a province. If anything some parts of Moldavia, fractions, were formally annexed and organized into distinct sanjaks ("provinces") that did not even border each other [17] [18], adding a layer of ambiguity to this issue. That sources with a wide general scope have chosen to use a common word to describe a detail that was clearly not given much attention do not change Moldavia's status in the past. Professional academic sources on the history of Romania will never refer to Moldavia as a "province". Super Ψ Dro 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        If you are concerned about the inaccuracy, the redirects can be tagged with {{R from incorrect name}}. As it stands, there are indeed sources which refer to this area as a "province" of the Ottoman Empire, so the redirects are plausible search terms. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          This idea (I do not see why should we keep blatantly inaccurate redirects) seems to come up fairly often. The telephone game by which we teach editors how Wikipedia works is not good at this kind of subject. So, because a lot of editors don't know, let me say that the point of a redirect is not to be accurate information, but to take readers to accurate information. An incorrect name can make a perfectly fine redirect. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide–Darwin rail corridor

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Law of fives

No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This is a discordian concept (e.g. [19]), so the redirect should go to Discordianism. Furius (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Redirect whose topics are not mentioned at the target do not help the reader at all. Veverve (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obvious Keep, what is this mass deletion of much of Discordian concepts? Randy Kryn (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore relevant section, which can be found here. I'll note that there may be more-recent revisions of this section somewhere in the page history and/or relevant sources to cite (given the section I'm linking didn't have sources at this time); finding said sources/newer revisions will be an exercise left to the editor, given holy hell, the page history for this page is a nightmare. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      This cannot be restored as it is unsourced (WP:BURDEN). Veverve (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        This is the correct page in the Principia Discordia (the holy book of this religion), and should serve as a fairly good source for this section, especially given it already claims to (and upon checking, DOES) quote said book. As a note, this took FIVE SECONDS to find, given said book is literally linked to, multiple times, by both this old version of the page AND the current version.
        There's a time and a place to use WP:BURDEN. "I don't feel like taking a five second check to see if I can find a source myself in the most obvious spot(s)" isn't the time nor place. (edit at 12:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          Just like the Bible is most of the time not a RS to talk about Christianity, using this book the way you propose is OR from a primary source and not the use of a secondary RS. Primary sources should often be avoided, and in this case it should. Yes, you can WP:SELFSOURCE, but the relevance of the information (WP:ONUS) is to be decided by secondary sources (do they mention the information? do they say it is an important information, how much do they dedicate to said information?) and not by the presence of redirects. Veverve (talk) 18:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            Well, all right, let's just check the next most obvious spot, being one of the sources we already have, and... Oh hey look, Invented Religions (the book cited multiple times already in these discussions) has a mention of the Law of Fives, too.
            Would be helpful if Google Books had a way to see the full discussion of the topic without buying the book but w/e
            In any case, that brings me back to my main point, there-- it's unhelpful, and actively harmful, to take a broad hatchet and hack away at unsourced parts of an article without first checking the most obvious places to see if you can find a source yourself. Those most obvious places including texts referenced in/quoted by the article without linking to them (which can quickly become sourcing FROM those texts), texts already used as sources elsewhere in the article, and a five-second search on Google Books. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Okmrman (talk) 03:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete, but restore if the secondary sources mentioned above are used to write about the Law of Fives in the main article. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronomian

The target article does not mention the word “Pronomian” nor explain what the word means. Bwrs (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: This seems to be an R from antonym, given the "Anti-" in the target article is getting swapped for "Pro-", with the implication that the views of "Pronomians" are opposite that of "Antinomians". That said, I'd like to point out that R from Antonym as an rcat is one of those rcats that populates a maintenance category, so we can't just tag as Antonym and keep. (Which is odd to me? If we don't have an article on something, but we have an article on its direct opposite, and we can reasonably and competently explain the first thing as "the complete opposite of this second thing", then that seems to be a good place to have a redirect. Why is this rcat populating a maintenance category?) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Do we really know for a fact that pronomianism is the opposite of antinomianism, or do we merely assume so based on the fact that “pro-” is the opposite of “anti-”? Now, if I really wanted to rid Wikipedia of these redirects I can tell you that they were made by somebody who is the subject of an WP:Office action. But the Wiki: Office never publishes the reasons for its actions, and I hope that discussing it here might raise the attention of subject matter experts who know what pronomianism actually is. Bwrs (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        I think maybe we should redirect to Christian views on the Old Covenant. Antinomianism is usually used to mean a particular deviation from the mainstream Christian view (though we do a bad job of defining it in the article), so I don’t think this is an antonym, just another niche view.— JFHutson (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          Although that might be the most appropriate redirection target, it does not define the term either. Nowhere does the string “pronomian” appear in either the current target or in the new proposed target. This is one of my pet peeves, when a word I do not know redirects to an article that does not define this word. Bwrs (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            I'd be fine with deletion as well, as I doubt the redirect could be helpful to anyone.-- JFHutson (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Mountain (logo)

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

While the logo might be a mountain, the words "dark" nor "mountain" do not appear anywhere at the target page. We don't have any encyclopedic about a dark mountain logo, which encyclopedic content about a logo seems to be specifically requested through this search term, by including "logo" in the title. With this being tagged as a "related meme without a mention", I'm not too convinced about its plausibility standalone. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete Not specific enough, a description of the logo shouldn't be a redirect target if the logo hasn't actually be called like this. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The logo doesn't seem to be referred to as this nor does this seem to be a meme. The mountain in the logo is white anyways. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Deco

I presume this might have once been [mentioned], but now this concept of Dark Deco is not mentioned at the target. It has minor mentions across Wikipedia in reference to properties such as Batman: The Animated Series (across this and 2 other related pages, Gotham City and Andrea Beaumont), and also at Skullgirls in a quote. As it looks like 75% of all mentions of "Dark Deco" are at Batman pages, perhaps sending this to Batman: The Animated Series is the primary topic? Searching "Dark Deco" externally, 50% of my results are all Batman, with the rest of the topics being neologism hodgepodge across blogs and such. Now that I look into this more, I'm close to believing that "Dark Deco" is a specific Batman-related topic, and one that we cover across multiple Batman pages and basically nowhere else, but I wanted to bring this here as the current target has been fairly longstanding. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Catching

A film that is not mentioned at the target article. I presume it's about the target, but with no mentions to Mill, the connection is unclear? Dreamcatching is a similar redirect that currently points to Dreamcatcher, which this is a variation of. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winged spear

Between Corseque, Spetum, and the fact that this redirect is not mentioned in the current target, it's not clear which subject readers are desiring to locate when searching this term. (However, used to be a section at Polearm#Winged spear, a section which was present in 2012, but was removed at some point that year.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I must admit the Bohemian Earspoon is not the most obvious redirect. Winged spears are probably ancestral to the spetum and corseque too. If I were to plump for one, it would probably be spetum. But there is an argument that a separate article or article section on the weapon would ultimately be preferable. Be hard to make it above a start though. Monstrelet (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Yeah, makes me wonder if the section I linked which existed over a decade ago should be restored, or even used to overwrite the nominated redirect with an article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, link baiting differs from clickbait to the degree that the redirect is misleading. Link baiting does not have the deceptive nature of clickbait. Acalc79 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Japanator.com

Target article doesn't mention Japanator. Anyone has any idea? Neocorelight (Talk) 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the way to Aberystwyth


Not mentioned at target. Youtube suggests it's a parody version of the song, but it's not mentioned here, and doesn't look to be widely covered, and thus an implausible search term in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

52nd International Film Festival Rotterdam

Misleading redirect, actually pointing to the 51st edition of the festival. Per WP:REDLINK a redlink would be more useful, as it would encourage editors to create the page, and not giving them the impression the page already exists. Cavarrone 16:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian concession in Sarandë

Romanian Institute in Albania was originally created under this title. The author, blocked since 2019, appears to have misread the sources he used. Albania granted a Romanian historian property in Sarandë and he established an institute on it and granted half of the land to the Romanian state, but this does not mean a part of Sarandë stopped being a sovereign part of Albania to become part of Romania. The "concession" thing is original research. No sources talk about this using the word "concession" [23]. This is ultimately a hoax. Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë should be deleted too. Super Ψ Dro 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bessel potential space

Sobolev space#Bessel potential spaces seems like a more precise target (though the articles should also ideally link to each other). 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balon D´Or

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balon de Oro

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

European footballer of the year

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yuno Miles

PROD'ed but redirects are ineligible for that process. The original PROD statement was: Redirects to an article that doesn't mention Miles. Appears reasonable to me, this person doesn't seem notable enough to be mentioned in the target article as far as I can tell and I don't immediately see a good alternative target. Pinging original nominator: @Frankoceanreal. Tollens (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appomatox coart house surrender

The double misspelling (both Appomattox and Court) with the miscapitalization on top makes this highly unlikely to be useful. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bounding Into Comics

The two seem unrelated. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 22

Climate change in Bahrain

We currently have many "Climate change in country x" titles that redirect to either "Geography of country x" or "Climate of country x". The style guide of WikiProject Climate change describe many aspects that should be in "Climate change in country x" articles that do not belong in articles about the climate or geography of country x. E.g. an article about climate change in a given country is supposed to discuss the greenhouse gas emissions that the country produces and the policies around emissions reductions in the country. The presence of these redirects discourages the creation of more complete articles so I propose that they be deleted. There are many other redirects following the pattern but I am starting with four of them to get community feedback before mass-nominating dozens. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 17:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

The subject never existed to begin with, similar to the 2022 edition in the same compeition.— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDontHaveSkype (talk • contribs) 10:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deplorable

Another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Not everything that is deplorable is part of Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables". We don't have deplore, so maybe a soft redirect to Wiktionary will have to do. Duckmather (talk) 06:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

📵

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I'm going to mark this for speedy deletion since there were suggestions in the original deletion discussion to redirect it to Etiquette in technology#Cell phone etiquette, which quickly got put down but someone still redirected it here anyways. I'm just gonna make this discussion to see if the discussion still holds up since it happened all the way back in 2015. Okmrman (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Abd-al-Rahman I of the Umayyad Sultanate

Unique for Wiki English. Not seen in the wild. Unlikely to be typed due to complexity.. Delete. Викидим (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Rhodes (murderer)

Since Walter Rhodes was not convicted of murder, the title of this page is misleading and an injustice. As there are multiple people by this name at Walter Rhodes, I am not sure if this page should simply be deleted or disambiguated differently. Gjs238 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki: ←

Ambiguous with Wiki: Indentation § Outdenting due to {{outdent2}}. Dabifying this may also help stop people from using od2 in articles (see the infobox in [25]). Nickps (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donkey Koung 64

implausible misspelling cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood and the United Kingdom and Ireland

Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R (here & here), but - as far as I can see - the target article only contains information about the United Kingdom, not Ireland. In addition, if Hollywood and the Republic of Ireland existed as an article, it would be unclear whether a reader was looking for information about Hollywood and the UK, or about Hollywood and Ireland. I'm therefore proposing deletion per WP:XY & WP:R#D2, as the inclusion of Ireland in these redirects (when it isn't mentioned at the target article) could cause confusion. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood and the Republic of Ireland

Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R, but - as far as I can see - the target page doesn't include any mention of Ireland. Proposing deletion per WP:R#D10/WP:REDLINK. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A. A. Abbott

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oorum Unavum

Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Trotskij

Delete per WP:RFD#D8. This appears to be the spelling of Trotsky's name in various North Germanic languages and this spelling isn't used in the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Easing function

Without a mention of "easing", making this already not a great target, there's also no mention of a "function" at the target either. While the page admittedly talks about an "ease-in" and an "ease-out", this is not necessarily an "easing function" and several other topics deal with "easing" as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jackahuahua

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Dog breed redirected at a 2008 AfD, seemingly been unmentioned at the target for over a decade. It's misleading to maintain breed redirect for a dog type that holds zero information on Wiki English. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 1, 2003

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No information about this date at the target page, although contains some further unique history. Unlike Jan 2, this has been to RfD before, and closed as no consensus. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2, 2003

No information about this date at the target page, although contains some history. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kyra Tierney

No discussion of a character called "Kyra Tierney" at the target article. Only mention on Wikipedia is at the disambig page for Tierney linking here, but the presence of a blue link implies we have content about this character, which we do not. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 French Open – Men's doubles

The events are currently a month away. It is the case of WP:TOOSOON

All these also redirects towards 2024 French Open#Events

PrinceofPunjabTALK 05:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10-year-old Ohio rape victim required to cross state lines to obtain abortion

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinatown, Auckland

This redirect was added by an account who also added a Chinatown template to the Balmoral article, this was later reversed. Whilst Balmoral and Dominion Road especially has a large Chinese presence the area is still overwhelmingly European and I've never heard it known as Chinatown. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Universe (Benee song)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

April 21

Priscilla Sebastian

No mention of "Priscilla" or "Sebastian" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poop On Your Neighbor

Well uh, even with replacement words I wouldn't consider "screw" to be equivalent to "poop on", and it's not like there's a pooping variation at play discussed at the target article, either... Utopes (talk / cont) 22:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokok

No mention of Pokok at the title, making this a confusing target. What I've found is that this is a word that can be found in various languages, which this usecase seems to be one as well. There is [29] on hu.wiki, [30] on ms.wiki, [31] on en.wikt, but even with just hu and ms wikis, without any mention of a translation it's unclear to readers which definition has a "higher priority" for an WP:RLANG. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Point of interaction

A "point of interaction component" is not discussed at the target article. Existed as an uncited couple-sentence stub for 14 years before being redirected into the page it was involved with, but is not actually a topic we cover on Wikipedia at this time. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plumbus

Undiscussed thing(?) from Rick and Morty not discussed at the target page. A 2016 AfD established that this thing(?) is not inherently notable, but I guess not even notable for inclusion at the target page. Not a useful redirect as an undiscussed concept, especially when it has the potential to steal searchers from OTHER articles (in this case, plumbous for lead), only to be taken to A: An article they didn't want to go to, and B: An article they're not sure why it exists, as "plumbus" never gets discussed so this doesn't even help the pure "plumbus" searchers either. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ploopy

No mention of this term at the target article. I fear the other location this redirect has pointed at isn't much better either. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Kingdom of the Isles

A location from The Riftwar Cycle fictional universe, but not mentioned in article. Should redirect to Kingdom of the Isles, but this redirect has the history of Riftwar. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkblood

No substantial mention of "Pinkblood" anywhere on Wikipedia; is only stated once in a citation on a different article. If this is a possibly notable group, seems to be worthwhile to keep as a red link to encourage article creation. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perry the Platypus Plumber?

No mention of this singular joke-line from the show at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peodeiktophilia

Originally created as a redirect to exhibitionism before being retargeted to anasyrma, this term is mentioned at neither of the articles in question and is not something that we have good coverage on at the moment, with the only mention of this word anywhere on Wikipedia being at the List of paraphilias. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penitent tangent

No mention of "penitent" or "tangent" at the target article. This might just be a character based on the edit summary(?) but with zero context at the target article there's no reason for people to think such, as readers are left with no context to this search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pearland NGC

No mention of "NGC" at the target page; this title has always been a redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pawanism

No mention of "Pawanism" at the target page. 7 years ago, it was said that "Pawanism isn't notable on its own, but should be discussed on Pawan Kalyan" in an edit summary. However, it is not. There are multiple people named Pawan on Wikipedia; "Pawanism" is too vague in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parade (Jake Miller song)

No mention of this song at the target page, nor is there one at the more expectedly Jake Miller discography listing. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panther Memorial Stadium, McBee

No longer mentioned at the target after a 2012 merge/redirect AfD closure. A high school's stadium does not need to be a redirect to the school if the stadium has no discussion at the target page, although the history may need to be dealt with. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P-hunting

The article in question does not discuss the "hunting" aspect. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki: →

Ambiguous with Help:Edit summaries § Section editing. In fact, since "→" is not on most keyboards, copying it from an edit summary should be one of the most likely ways it is being searched. Also, WP:← redirects to H:AES which causes the two redirects to be inconsistent with each other. I suggest we dabify. Nickps (talk) 14:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bioterrorism Security Assessment Alliance

Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 10:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply]

Special Tactics and Rescue Service

Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 10:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nizzotch

No edit summary or rcats, confusing why this exists and had to look for myself. Apparently a nickname, although not mentioned at target and not visibly useful. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Har har

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Raja Mahendra

This redirect is to a section of the article that no longer exists. The section was added by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer, and the redirect was also provided by the sockpuppeteer. The section no longer exists, so the redirect is useless. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spray paint

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep. Discussion should be held via WP:RM.

First Battle of Siversk

Delete. Battle of Siversk was merged on the basis that there was no substantial event that would be identified by the article title (see Talk:Battle of Siversk#Merge proposal). First Battle of Siversk was created on the premise that there soon would be a "second battle". However, if there were to be a battle for this town, either now or in the future, it would not be known as either the "first" or the "second" battles. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creek Massacre

Terrible redirect, there were numerous Foo Creek massacres, such as Indian Creek massacre, Myall Creek massacre, Waterloo Creek massacre, and on and on. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Games

The Summer Olympics are not known simply as "Games". See also Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 3#2022 Games. Mia Mahey (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 20

Royal tart

Should delete as to WP:FANCRUFT. BaduFerreira (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

The current target may be too technical for the search term. Alternatives could be Hilbert space or Euclidean space (or Euclidean space#Technical definition). Also note that the singular Finite dimensional Hilbert space, or the more correct hyphenations Finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces/Finite-dimensional Hilbert space do not currently exist. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pluri-

Pluri indeed means plural, but the current target is about grammatical person, and this prefix is used in other contexts (eg. plurinational, plurisexual, etc.) and it's not mentioned in the target page either. It could be dabified in line with multi. --MikutoH talk! 22:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cocklass

Unlikely misspelling, and web search only shows a bunch of unrelated results. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six word story

Sure it's the first six-word story but I don't think that when people refer to six word stories, they specifically refer to this one. Maybe retarget to flash fiction or Six-Word Memoirs. Okmrman (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jake the Jailbird

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

no such role exists or has existed -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Animals (2023 film)

Should be retargeted to Animal (disambiguation)#Films, like Animal (film) currently, or be deleted. Per the above DAB there are two 2023 films called "Animal", so targeting one specifically is inappropriate. Additionally, neither (including the Indian film) seems to actually be called "Animals". Toadspike (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multistorey

pretty sure multistorey can refer to any building with multiple floors and not just car parks Okmrman (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unuk

Also Unuk River. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

W2000

The first result I get when google searching is Walther WA 2000. There is also Hercules W-2000. Okmrman (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flexes

Someone that performs a Flex, or perhaps are flexing (and/or doing the flexing (dance) all the while), can be said to be someone who "flexes". Flexion does not seem to be the only use for this term. Wiktionary or disambiguation might also be suitable here? Utopes (talk / cont) 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My, my, this here Anakin guy

No mention of this lyric at the target page. Anakin never mentioned, people searching for this lyric instead of the title of the song are left without the context that was sought. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The One Piece is real!

Retarget either to Dark Fantasy (song)#Legacy or Patrick Fabian#Personal life as those sections both mention the subject, but the article it is redirecting to does not. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garv Sangwan

Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amc interview with the vampire

Redirects are not the same thing as search engines, this version seems unlikely to be directly linked. Mason (talk) 03:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajnibala

The redirect is for non-notable character not listed in the target article. The Google search returns many more relevant results that can be notable. Delete to avoid confusion. Alternatively, within Wikipedia, a plausible possible redirect is Saglikade Bombabomb where Rajnibala is a character. Викидим (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Dwayne

This was speedy deleted as R3 claiming No mention of a Tim Dwayne in target article. Since the redirect was created in 2010 R3 doesn't apply, so I've undeleted and am sending to RfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tape worm

Retarget to Eucestoda, as tapeworm redirects there. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 19

Turkish bath

The target of this redirect should likely be reconsidered. The most helpful solution may to turn this into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation). Reason: The term "Turkish bath" in a Western context is fairly generic and might also denote other types of steam baths, in addition to the mainly Islamic ones covered at Hammam. Since this was last discussed in 2021 (see here), a more fully-fledged Victorian Turkish bath article now exists. Other articles might also be relevant to link. Note: This came out of a discussion at Talk:Turkish Bath (disambiguation) between myself and Ishpoloni. Feel free to read there for more context & explanation. R Prazeres (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hammam is neither primary nor secondary. Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths only have in common that they are baths, and are both derived from the ancient Roman thermae. Victorian Turkish baths are not steam baths. Nor are they really, as the Hammam article states, "A variation on the Muslim bathhouse"—which is why in France and Germany they are called Roman-Irish baths.

The only guiding principle here should be: 'Save the time of the reader' Ranganathan's 4th law. Ishpoloni (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Having had time to familiarise myself more with the often complicated Wikipedia guidance notes, I now believe that the most equitable solution is the one suggested above by R Prazeres, ie, to change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation). This could either be based on the existing one or, perhaps preferably, like the Mercury page example given in the guidance notes. I believe this is a solution on which we should easily be able to reach consensus.

Reasons:

1. Of the 22 reasons for a redirect given on Wiki: Redirect the overwhelming majority relate to different forms of words, grammar, punctuation, etc. Not one exemplifies a redirect of one subject to another subject.

2. On Wiki: Disambiguation page the three important points seem to be: (a) naming articles so each has an unique title, eg, Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths; (b) making links so that a term points to the correct article; (c) "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be." (My emphasis)

Proposed resolution: Change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation)

An allied matter: In case there are Western European readers of this Wikipedia, there should be Redirects < Irish-Roman baths and < Roman-Irish baths > Victorian Turkish baths. Ishpoloni (talk) 07:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Penny station

Unlikely a flag stop is the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor characters in MÄR

The target contains no such list. Both of these have prior article history but Wiki: Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nanashi (MÄR)

Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but Wiki: Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various MAR characters

Not mentioned at target at all. Most of these have prior article history but Wiki: Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various MAR characters (2)

Discussed at target ones or twice in passing but without enough substance to warrant a redirect. Most of these have prior article history but Wiki: Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El Loco (wrestler)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El Loco (Los de Abajo song)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Na Sé Contaethe

Not a plausible search term. Also not mentioned in target (I tried ctrl+f/F3) JuniperChill (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epic Fail Guy

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ELLIS, DICK

No affinity for ALL CAPS. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eclipse.org

Probably Eclipse Foundation is a more precise target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwik Crisp

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Sea Cadets (United Kingdom). Current target does not mention the term "Navy League", which seems to apply to the Sea Cadets organization prior to merging with the Marine Society. Hoof Hearted (talk) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H***** S***

Unlikely search terms and it's unclear how they should relate to the target. These redirects don't even use the proper number of asterisks to replace the letters. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hekt

Not mentioned at the target. External searches don't pull up anything related to this scale, although it appears to be an alternative name for Heqet, says Google. However, it does not appear at Heqet (our page on Wikipedia uses "Heket", but Google's definitely uses "Hekt"). In any case, "Hekt" is short enough to have a surplus of other mentions on Wikipedia as a word, appearing across the board in terms of viability as a redirect. Also sometimes short for "Hektor" and several others. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

جمادى الآخر أو جمادى الثان

Unlikely search term. MSMST1543 (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint John High School Fencing Club

Unnecessary redirect, clubs of specific schools would typically not be made into an article (or redirect for that matter) unless it is notable. This is the only redirect to High school fencing aside from a different capitalization redirect. B3251 (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppa Hitler Style

The target section discusses the "Hitler reacts" Downfall/Untergang memes generally, but not specific ones, and I don't think it really needs to. Thus, I'm skeptical of redirecting the names of specific parodies. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki: LITTLEORPHAN

While seemingly in reference to the pronunciation of "ANI" as being for "(Little orphan) Annie", I fully thought a shortcut with this name would have been in reference to little orphaned pages on Wiki English. Anyone familiar enough with the WP culture of "ANI sounds like Annie therefore Little Orphan is a functional redirect", and can solve those literary gymnastics on the dime, would also be familiar enough to use one of the several other more-convenient avenues of reaching this noticeboard. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Dave

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have successfully kicked the can down the road with this one. Months later, no mention of this quotation from the movie. If it's as important as claimed, it would either A: have its own article, B: be covered SOMEwhere, or C: be a red link to encourage content creation wherever it makes sense to do so. As it stands, A and B are off the table (or at least not yet done), and with nothing on Wikipedia about this quote, this is still not a helpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

La, la

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

I was up above it

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

I See You (Kap G song)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

I just farted

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

I have a bad feeling about this

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

I Beheld His Glory

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#I Beheld His Glory

Hubert’s Lemonade

Neither "Hubert" nor, surprisingly, "Lemonade" comes up at the target article. Seems to be a brand of lemonade owned by Coca-Cola, but targeting this specific brand to the overarching company is not useful for people looking for Hubert's Lemonade. If people wanted to read about the Coca Cola company instead, they'd just search for the Coca Cola company directly. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse News

This redirect survived CSD through a charitable BLAR. Not mentioned at the target, not likely to be mentioned at the target. Not a useful redirect in the page's current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Karlomann

This misspelling is unique to Wikipedia, Google does not know about it. Delete. Викидим (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold On To This

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hitler Reacts (Internet meme)

The word "react" does not appear in any form at the target article, nor are Hitler's reactions ever alluded to. Does not seem helpful as effectively an "R from unmentioned, related meme term to Internet section" Utopes (talk / cont) 03:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highnoon

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Highnoon

Heaven’s Gate (AJ Mitchell song)

No song with either of these names is discussed at the target article; nothing present for people searching for this song, only to be given a page with zero relevant information. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HDIV

Apparently HDIV is now a part of Datadog. However, this framework is never mentioned anywhere at the target article. This undone PROD seems to be either suited for a standalone article (hard as there were no references previously), or no article at all. The status quo of retargeting this to the parent of Datadog does not seem helpful for people searching for this term to find out what HDIV means perhaps, and not having any content at the target to answer these questions. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heavytread

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Heartbroken (Hrvy song)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Harmonious Claptrap

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Halo 1 pistol

According to the halo wiki, there are "many different pistols used in the Halo universe". I don't think this is a useful search term, zero evidence that "Halo 1 pistol" is an alternate name for this pistol even if used by Master Chief. Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out "what's the name of the pistol that Master Chief uses in Halo 1". Not a great precedent for titles, i.e. based on MOS:POPCULT, and franchises that reference a real model of pistol. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Half-holing

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Halahel

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

OperaMail.com

Neither Opera mail nor "OperaMail" are mentioned at the target, much less its supposed .com domain. This domain currently exists on the web as a redirect to opera dot com, and as for Wikipedia, without a mention of operamail this does not seem to be the most helpful currently. (Even if it's a mail site that was acquired by Opera from 2010 to 2013. Notably, this redirect was created in 2011 when the "opera" description was accurate, but Fastmail became independent again very shortly after and has been so for the last decade.) Utopes (talk / cont) 01:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open Floor

No information about "Open Floor" at the target, which is noted in the edit history as being an "entirely different school than 5Rhythms". Was blanked for a moment in 2021, but was restored as a redirect due to no content being added. In any case, this title is ambiguous with Open floor plan which is a redirect to the article of Open plan, who's content is directly pertinent to open floors. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Open Floor is a style of modern dance, as is 5Rhythms. The two are not the same so the redirect (from a dance point of view) should go to Modern dance, with a brief mention of the approach to be added there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open Access Directory

No mention of anything being "open access", or a "directory" at the target page. Currently, this redirect is not helpful as people who might be looking for this directory are instead taken to information about the university instead of information about the directory that they specified. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One World (imprint)

No mention of this imprint at the target article, anyone specifying this would not receive any content about their search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Odiogo

Redirected to the history of podcasting after an AfD, because there was no sourced content worth merging. However, it doesn't appear at the target any longer, if it appeared to begin with if the merge idea fell through. Does not seem to be a useful redirect in the target's current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutrient Recovery and Reuse

No mention of "Nutrient" at the target page. Was created as a redirect without mention at the target. Afterward, the creator proceeded to link this term in the See Also sections of high profile pages that had very stringent connections to the "Recovery and Reuse of Nutrients". Seems to be an effort to establish notoriety to this term, which appears nowhere on Wikipedia in an academic context, sans the randomly piped See Also mentions. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonstop Sampler

No mention of Nonstop Sampler at the target discography, does not seem to be a likely search term without any content pertinent to it. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-crypto Public Chain

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nine to Noon

Neither nine nor noon are noted near this novella. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nights' Science

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nights (program)

No mention of a program called "Nights" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NetApp FlexVol

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Neohapantotype

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Neb-er-tcher

Apparently a god in Egyptian mythology, however this god is not ever described at the Osiris article, and bears no mention. People who search this term are left confused as to the correlation between this god and Osiris. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 18

Favorability

I just created it but I'm not sure anymore. I noticed willingness could mean the same. Or should it be targeted to Wiktionary? --MikutoH talk! 23:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gribbly

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gribbly

Gorbino's Quest

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gorbino's Quest

General OneFile

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Gender and authoritarianism

Used to target a section, since removed. The article does not talk about gender, and is a WP:XY situation as it stands. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party of Nepal—Maoist

Apparently this specific political party's formal name at one point in the past included the em dash. Since readers are unlikely to be familiar with the way Nepalese political parties copy each other's names with minor pertubations this should be retargeted to the dab at Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonton Strathcona

No evidence the current target is the primary topic for this specific spelling, retarget to dab at Strathcona#Canadian electoral districts. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

0–20

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

0–1

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

World – Seeks Worldwide Online Participatory Democracy

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Winter storms of 2006–07

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

State Route 221 (Virginia 1923–1928)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

South African cricket team in India in 2021–22

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)

Baker–Unity Highway No. 13

"Baker–Unity Highway" is mentioned at both targets. "No. 13" is mentioned nowhere, leaving the context confused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bader–Ofer method

Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bluster Kong

That section no longer exists. This character is mentioned exactly once in the whole article, and that mention is in passing. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp

Per Wiki: Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp, this requires a full discussion. @JayCubby, L293D, Robert McClenon, SmokeyJoe, Alalch E., Pppery, Matrix, Queen of Hearts, and NasssaNser: — pinging participants in the MfD discussion. BD2412 T 16:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dougie (disambiguation)

The set index is not a disambiguation. I can only find Dougie as a dance, and Dougie (given name), but I can't find the 3rd. If you can't find the 3rd one, will this page be deleted or kept? 176.42.17.150 (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX Mars propellant plant

PROD'd by user:Ergzay, who states "Destination page no longer contains info regarding this and no page on Wikipedia exists for this. Best to return this to non-existence and let someone create it when it's needed." PROD can only be used on actual articles, so I'm moving this here as a courtesy. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hornsea88

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Paramount Television International Studios

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per the outcome at Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Paramount Television International Studios, where incoming links were the hurdle straight after a page move, I've given it enough time for the actual targets and/or rdr targets to be sorted out. The reason or rationale is the same as its/the original listing. Intrisit (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Goulash (magazine)

This is a local(?) satirical(?) magazine published by a boarding school. Zero standalone notability, existed as two sentences that were BLAR'd immediately into the school it was published from. No mention of "goulash" anywhere at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Community of Geometry Dash

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Muttering Idiot

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Modmin

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Modmin

Mimoid

No mention of this novel feature(?), aspect? mentioned at the target article. Has three other mentions on Wikipedia in different contexts, also Mimoides exists with a number of subarticles on species. Not currently a useful redirect without context at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mental gymnastics

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Mental gymnastics

PanoramaMaker

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#PanoramaMaker

TotalMedia Theatre

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#TotalMedia Theatre

MediaImpression

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#MediaImpression

Manta (Unreal Tournament)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Man’s red fire / flower

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

A man has fallen into a river in Lego City

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Making televsion

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Make Me A World

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Maha (cat)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Magnetic air car

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fucktarded

Salt evasion of Fucktard. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Insurance goal

Not mentioned at the target page. Tea2min (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey bag

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Nikolas Macko

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Nikolas Macko

Lynn Thomas (That's So Raven)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lower Quebec

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Look how they massacred my boy

This redirect is categorized as follows: A meme quotation from film and television, that is not mentioned at the article. Wikipedia is not an infinite compendium of unmentioned memes. Not a helpful redirect as people who want to read about The Godfather would search for The Godfather. Specifying a meme implies a search for specific content that we don't have on WP. Delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long life motor oil

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Living foods diet

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Liquid nails

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Liquid nails

Lee Yu-jeong (singer)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Leave The Light On (Johnny Orlando song)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lamb Chop (The Sheep-Pig)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lady Godiva syndrome

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lady Godiva syndrome

Lack of imagination

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lack of imagination

Template:Hlist1

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 17

Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Jeez

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Superhero landing

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Drama Juniors Marathi

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Drama Juniors Marathi

Jau Bai Gavat Unseen

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Jau Bai Gavat Unseen

Basilan Unity Party

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Basilan Unity Party

I luv u

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget to I Love You.

Hornless unicorn

Unicorns are not real. The article makes no mention of unicorns. It would be impossible for a hornless unicorn to be a horse because that would require a fictional creature variant to be real, which it is not and never will be. The target page does not mention unicorns in the slightest. Anyone that specifies "unicorn" instead of "horse" is likely looking for a unicorn related subtopic, instead of the general WP:SYNTH explanation for horse. Unicorn, Unicorn horn, or deletion are all preferable outcomes for this title which currently exists unmentioned at the horse page. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cat:NN

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Honestly, I have no idea how this WP:XNR survived RfD. "Cat:" is not a pseudo-namespace. Looking at WP:Shortcut#List of prefixes, "Cat:" appears nowhere. It is not widely accepted, it is nowhere accepted. CAT:NN has existed since 2006. This lowercase version was created in 2020. The RfD said "keep because it is used widely in links" which is simply entirely incorrect. The search result provided then, showed usage of EXCLUSIVELY the uppercase variant. From a quantitative perspective, CAT:NN has 500+ links. Cat:NN has zero, besides the deletion notifications. If someone wants to campaign for the existence of a new lowercase "Cat" namespace, that should be done before the existence of these redirects. (Which as per Pandora's WikiBox, the existence of one has since introduced two more also bundled). Utopes (talk / cont) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed adoodie

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Ahmed adoodie

Democratic Labour Party (historical)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Democratic Labour Party (historical)

Heil mein Führer!

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Joever

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Joever

Windows 8.3

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: deleted

Ten News First Late

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of lists

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#List of lists

Death is a preferable alternative to communism

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ductal

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Ductal

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Extinct World

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:WikiProject Animals in Media

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

National culture

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#National culture

Freeze, everybody clap your hands!

The addition of "Freeze" means that it can't be confused with Live at Tokyo Dome, but despite that, without a mention of this lyric, we don't have anything for readers that search the specific lyric of "everybody clap your hands" instead of the song itself. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fil d'Ecosse

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Factor through

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Larissa Hodge

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Larissa Hodge

April 16

Watch channel

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Draft:Windows 8.25

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

DSRL

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Entire (animal)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Keep (Nomination Withdrawn).

Sam Malone (DJ)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2012: Doomsday

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

The F-Bomb (documentary)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kannagi (upcoming film)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Kannagi (upcoming film)

The beach that makes you old

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Paradise Airport

This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in Paradise, California, nowhere near Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winged spear

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Winged spear

General Dollar

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Link baiting

Romanian concession in Sarandë

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Romanian concession in Sarandë

Phone computer

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Phone computer

Faulty thinking

I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact. Hildeoc (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poopoo

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Immigration control in Russia

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Pepitos

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dale Becker

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Japanator.com

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Japanator.com


April 15

Drew Curtis' FARK.com

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Dream Catching

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dream Catching

Dark Deco

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Deco

Dark Mountain (logo)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Mountain (logo)

Actions Prior to Grant's Landing

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pronomian

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Pronomian

Baffle Of Chancellorsville

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Clean vocals

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mentions of "clean" at the target page. At the target page, the act of singing is never implied to be "clean", or even consist of "clean vocals". The primary justification for this redirect existing is that unclean vocals is a redirect to death growl. Yet, its antonym has no mention at the general page for "singing". If clean and unclean vocals are antonyms, and both are redirects, this seems to imply that the concepts of "singing" and "death growl" are also "antonyms" in regard to vocal quality? Likely true, but never addressed (nor does it need to be imo). For someone specifically looking for information on the topic of "clean vocals", it seems to be preferable for these readers to end up at a topic that is directly pertinent to vocal quality. If people wanted to end up at Singing instead, they'd type singing, a concept everyone would have already been familiar with. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Independent MPs

Template:Independent MPs in Canada used to be at this pagename until I moved it to clarify its scope and avoid potential confusion with other navboxes, e.g. Template:Independent MPs in the United Kingdom. Now that the Canadian navbox is transcluded directly through its new name, I suggest that the old name be deleted to avoid any future mix-ups, e.g. being added to a British MP's biography by mistake. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Deuce

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Not mentioned alternative name. Basically any time it comes up on Wikipedia, is people (including residents) saying that they've never heard this alternative name. The sources raised have all been mediocre, and as this was never added post-discussion-conclusion, it does not seem to have any use and only adds confusion for those who search this term and end up at a city where its colloquial(?)/uncommon nickname is not mentioned. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technofascism and Techno-fascism

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Technofascism and Techno-fascism

GWGFJ

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Awooo

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

7.92

searching it up on google doesn't result in 8 mm but it does show another bullet type Okmrman (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deplorable

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#Deplorable

The F-Bomb (movie)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (movie)

F-Bomb (documentary)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (documentary)

F-Bomb (film)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (film)

The F-Bomb (film)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (film)

F-Bomb (movie)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (movie)

The American Dodgeball Association of America

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ottoman Bessarabia

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

(pokémon character)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

Law of fives

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Law of fives

Tantras

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dependence liability

Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Ukraine missile strike

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

April 13

Environmental Analysis of Computing

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jake the Jailbird

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Jake the Jailbird

Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

Royal tart

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Royal tart

Animals (2023 film)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Animals (2023 film)

Microsoft Company, Ltd.

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Verticon

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Psychological addiction

Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc (talk) 05:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdur Rahim (politician)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Tracy Grandstaff

Delete due to no suitable target, since Grandstaff is not only known for voicing Daria and is mentioned in several other articles, including those related to Beavis and Butt-Head, The Real World (TV series), and Taina (TV series) (see [41]). — Goszei (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hail eris

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Avanturine glance

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn by nominator

Punctured plane

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Differential algebraic variety

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Filtered ring

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Order of Accendo

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: restore article

POEE

No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

George W's palace

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Rajnibala

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Rajnibala

Black French (disambiguation)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Amc interview with the vampire

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Amc interview with the vampire

Garv Sangwan

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Garv Sangwan

Afflux

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dominika Hašková (Q105156345)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 11

CounterfeitElectronicComponents

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bruce Shotland

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Qwertqwert

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Great Expectations (upcoming TV series)

Delete in the spirit of WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedalanka, Bhattiprolu mandal

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: wrong venue

Curse bowl

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Chat Control 2.0

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Favorability

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Favorability

Macmillan Digital Publishing

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gullible.info

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Forced-birther

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Grizzly-1

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gris (card game)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gribbly

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gribbly

Great September

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Great Firewall of America

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Goulash (magazine)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Goulash (magazine)

Gorbino's Quest

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gorbino's Quest

Good Thing (Jake Miller song)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

FIFA 2003

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Gib gnab

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Paramount Television International Studios

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Paramount Television International Studios

German Low German language

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

General OneFile

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#General OneFile

Gender and authoritarianism

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gender and authoritarianism

Wiki: RFDd10

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

DZHH-AM

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#DZHH-AM

Chen Mazzig

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Untitled Guy Ritchie project/film

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Snow White (live action)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Snow White remake

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Snow White remake

TDVC

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

TDOTJ

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

LVER

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

"Getting high" and "Being high"

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Keep Being high and Retarget Getting high

GittiGidiyor

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nahdonnis Praji

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jerus Jannick

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Quiggold

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Vober Dand

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 10

Grind Time Now

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

William Melling (actor)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Wally Francis (CBSO)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Galactic Federation of Free Alliances

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori Kokalot

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori (album)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gabby and Ty

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

$10 calculator

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

$299

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sonichu.com

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedily deleted

Season 7, 2016

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pehli Nazar Mein Dari Thi

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Mahjong Horoki Classic

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Insurance goal

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Insurance goal

Hockey bag

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Hockey bag

Newbridge Capital

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Efinancialcareers.com

Deletion, eFinancialCareers is no longer owned by DHI Group or Dice.com Mjhobson (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Jeez

Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

Fucktarded

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Fucktarded

Bhumi(Chennai)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Double the Trouble (album)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Desmond Cook (Lost)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cort and Fatboy Show

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cheaper by the Dozen 3: The White House Wreck

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bella Bathrooms (company)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Beavecoon iCarly

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Balita sa IBC Huling Ulat

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete and salt

Aegis Limited (BPO)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Adi Gallia (Star Wars)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Kitster

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

G-Whizz

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Po Nudo

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Democratic Labor Party (historical)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Joever

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Joever

Augastus Ekka

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Clorinda (Once Upon a Time)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Amazonas Region

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)

This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Theme

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Big Nose

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Mos:english idioms

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nashid Al-Huriya

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

April 8

EduTok

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Echo Ranch Bible Camp

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Drinkin About You

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Drew Curtis' FARK.com

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com

Dream Catching

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching

Disputed Kings and Queens of Narnia

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dark Mountain (logo)

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)

Dark Deco

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco

Cut fingering

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Clean vocals

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals

Chief harbourmaster

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Brut up

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:Independent MPs

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs

Brain sex

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Ace Deuce

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce

Academic School

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Borgarthings-Lov

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Delete

List of Barbie: Dreamtopia episodes

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Delete!

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Colonia Ulpia Traiana

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana

Faulty thinking

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking

Colon Bracket

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Mullhausen

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Luxury home

After the merging of Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes (talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preservation of the saints

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

No chance in hell

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Raindrops on the Open Road (ROTOR) - EP

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

SpaceX Mars propellant plant

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant

Immigration control in Russia

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia

Sam Boughton

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

-)

A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes (talk / cont) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

;-;

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

')

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Burnie board

No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Los Bajos, Chile

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Loule Cross Country

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Firestone (Pern)

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

7.92

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92

Eddie Yongming WU

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

John B. Clark

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Catherine, Princess of Wales cancer diagnosis

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Comazant

This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Food Hall

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Bitness

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect

Antiscarp

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect to wiktionary

Deplorable

redirects For Discussion  Relisted, see Wiki: Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable

Disorganized

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Family Ties (Fat Joe album

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dune (1984 film and etc.

redirects For Discussion  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Wiki:Redirects for discussion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.

Tags:

redirects For Discussion Current listredirects For DiscussionWikipedia:Redirect

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

World Chess Championship 2024LaptopHanumanJonathan KnightHamasRichard RudolphList of constituencies of the Lok SabhaPremier LeagueIsrael–Hamas warTed BundyWolfgang Amadeus MozartAlgebraic notation (chess)Alex GarlandWindows 10 version historyRobert KraftP. K. SubbanBruce WillisQuentin TarantinoDan SchneiderAdministrative Professionals DayWilliam ShakespeareU.S. stateMahatma GandhiIndian Premier LeagueWrestleMania XLMexicoTravis ScottArmenian Genocide Remembrance DayList of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2023Salman RushdieDrop bearGAZ SobolDarren WallerDrake (musician)John F. KennedyCosmo JarvisSummer LeeDune (novel)Manchester United F.C.Inter MilanFallout 76MadonnaRise of the Planet of the ApesThe BeatlesNapoleonBBC World ServiceWWEIndiaWill SmithLuca GuadagninoSplit (2016 American film)Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (film)Kysre GondrezickSeptember 11 attacksFranceEmma StoneTitan (moon)The Judge (2014 film)Jelly Roll (singer)The Fall Guy (2024 film)Immaculate (2024 film)Nazi GermanyChallengers (film)Steve JobsAmazon (company)George IIIDownloadHunter WendelstedtNewcastle United F.C.United NationsHenry CavillNo Way UpArthur the KingJoe ManganielloOnlyFansDeepak ParambolAWorld War II🡆 More