On this page, the deletion or merging of templates and modules, except as noted below, is discussed.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by AnomieBOT (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
V | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 51 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
The majority of deletion and merger proposals concerning pages in the template namespace and module namespace should be listed on this page. However, there are a few exceptions:
Templates should not be nominated if the issue can be fixed by normal editing. Instead, you should edit the template to fix its problems. If the template is complex and you don't know how to fix it, WikiProject Templates may be able to help.
Templates for which none of these apply may be deleted by consensus here. If a template is being misused, consider clarifying its documentation to indicate the correct use, or informing those that misuse it, rather than nominating it for deletion. Initiate a discussion on the template talk page if the correct use itself is under debate.
To list a template for deletion or merging, follow this three-step process. The use of Twinkle (explained below) is strongly recommended, as it automates and simplifies these steps. Note that the "Template:" prefix should not be included anywhere when carrying out these steps (unless otherwise specified).
Step | Instructions |
---|---|
I: Tag the template. | Add one of the following codes to the top of the template page:
Note:
Multiple templates: If you are nominating multiple related templates, choose a meaningful title for the discussion (like "American films by decade templates"). Tag every template with Related categories: If including template-populated tracking categories in the TfD nomination, add TemplateStyles pages: The above templates will not work on TemplateStyles pages. Instead, add a CSS comment to the top of the page:
|
II: List the template at TfD. | Follow this link to edit today's TfD log. Add this text to the top of the list:
If the template has had previous TfDs, you can add Use an edit summary such as Multiple templates: If this is a deletion proposal involving multiple templates, use the following: {{subst:Tfd2|template name 1|template name 2 ...|title=meaningful discussion title|text=Why you think the templates should be deleted. ~~~~}} You can add up to 50 template names (separated by vertical bar characters If this is a merger proposal involving more than two templates, use the following: {{subst:Tfm2|template name 1|template name 2 ...|with=main template (optional)|title=meaningful discussion title|text=Why you think the templates should be merged. ~~~~}} You can add up to 50 template names (separated by vertical bar characters Related categories: If this is a deletion proposal involving a template and a category populated solely by templates, add this code in the {{subst:Catfd2|category name}} |
III: Notify users. | Please notify the creator of the template nominated (as well as the creator of the target template, if proposing a merger). It is helpful to also notify the main contributors of the template that you are nominating. To find them, look in the page history or talk page of the template. Then, add one of the following:
to the talk pages of the template creator (and the creator of the other template for a merger) and the talk pages of the main contributors. It is also helpful to make any interested WikiProjects aware of the discussion. To do that, make sure the template's talk page is tagged with the banners of any relevant WikiProjects; please consider notifying any of them that do not use Article alerts. Multiple templates: There is no template for notifying an editor about a multiple-template nomination: please write a personal message in these cases. |
Consider adding any templates you nominate for TfD to your watchlist. This will help ensure that the TfD tag is not removed.
While it is sufficient to list a template for discussion at TfD (see above), nominators and others sometimes want to attract more attention from and participation by informed editors. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing.
To encourage participation by less experienced editors, please avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations in the messages you leave about the discussion, link to any relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the TfD discussion page itself. If you are recommending that a template be speedily deleted, please give the criterion that it meets.
WikiProjects are groups of editors that are interested in a particular subject or type of editing. If the article is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, they may welcome a brief, neutral note on their project's talk page(s) about the TfD. You can use {{Tfd notice}}
for this.
Tagging the nominated template's talk page with a relevant Wikiproject's banner will result in the template being listed in that project's Article Alerts automatically, if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a template with {{WikiProject Physics}} will list the discussion in Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.
While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the template and its talkpage that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, look in the page history or talk page.
At this point, you've done all you need to do as nominator. Sometime after seven days have passed, someone else will either close the discussion or, where needed, "relist" it for another seven days of discussion. (That "someone" may not be you, the nominator.)
Once you have submitted a template here, no further action is necessary on your part. If the nomination is successful it will be added to the Holding Cell until the change is implemented. There is no requirement for nominators to be part of the implementation process, but they are allowed to if they so wish.
Also, consider adding any templates you nominate to your watchlist. This will help ensure that your nomination tag is not mistakenly or deliberately removed.
Twinkle is a convenient tool that can perform many of the posting and notification functions automatically, with fewer errors and missed steps than manual editing. Twinkle does not notify WikiProjects, although many of them have automatic alerts. It is helpful to notify any interested WikiProjects that don't receive alerts, but this has to be done manually.
Anyone can join the discussion, but please understand the deletion policy and explain your reasoning.
People will sometimes also recommend subst or subst and delete and similar. This means the template text should be "merged" into the articles that use it. Depending on the content, the template page may then be deleted; if preserving the edit history for attribution is desirable, it may be history-merged with the target article or moved to mainspace and redirected.
Templates are rarely orphaned—that is, removed from pages that transclude them—before the discussion is closed. A list of open discussions eligible for closure can be found at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Old unclosed discussions.
Administrators should read the closing instructions before closing a nomination. Note that WP:XFDcloser semi-automates this process and ensures all of the appropriate steps are taken.
Navbox with three links. Subject does not have an English Wikipedia article. DB1729talk 22:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox with only two blue links in the body. DB1729talk 22:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Just two links, WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 15:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
All but two of these redirect to the same article. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 13:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Three links, no main article. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 11:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Only two links (including main article!) WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 10:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Template is under-used, transcluded on only 35 33 pages. Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Propose merging Template:Cite GREC with Template:GEC.
They cover the identical source, the Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana. GEC has 14 mainspace inlinks and is more recent (but no doc); GREC has 17 (and iffy doc). My preference is that the merged name be 'Cite GEC' (and that all such wrappers should start with 'Cite'; they are so much easier to find when they do). Mathglot (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links (and one duplicate link), not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Only three blue links to individual articles, the rest are redirects or links to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Only two blue links to individual articles, the rest are redirects or links to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Only one blue link to an individual article, the rest are redirects or link to sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Only one blue link to an individual article, the rest are redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No blue links to individual articles, only to redirects or sections of articles. Template does not provide enough navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
No blue links to individual articles, only to sections within articles. This template does not provide adequate navigation to warrant existence. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
There are only two blue links that lead to individual articles, the rest link to article sections or are redirects because they were deemed non-notable. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The only blue links are to sections of articles because the topics were not notable on their own. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains three blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains one blue link, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only contains two blue links, not enough to warrant the existence of this template for navigation purposes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is not a good subject for a navbox, this is list content masquerading as a navbox. --woodensuperman 16:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Still unused 4 years after last nomination. Can't be useful if no one uses it. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in tests and one talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one old talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7 (you could have just asked). Primefac (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one old user module sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one old user module sandbox. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module other than in one example in talk page. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/...) if the creator wants to keep it. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. Parent template uses Navbox documentation. DrChuck68 (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. Parent template uses Navbox documentation. DrChuck68 (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. DB1729talk 15:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No links at all in the navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Contains only one link repeated twice to one article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused template for the former discretionary sanctions system. No alternative template in the Template:Contentious topics system that could be redirected to. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Experimental. Its only use is as an example at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Flags as headers where it received pretty much universal disapproval. DB1729talk 00:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The template has no articles related to social democracy in Greece. Historical events have nothing to do with social democracy. Only parties can be described as both social democratic and some of the people. The template lacks documentation. D.S. Lioness (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Template for linking to a user-generated site, so never going to be usable as its content is inherently non-RS Bon courage (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Sites that fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sourceswhich clearly shows sites that are not reliable sources can still be useful/due in the EL. These are the largest structured argument maps on that subject and just name-calling things is not an reason for deletion. A template allows managing how these links show up from one place. In regards to the deletion rationale from Objective3000, that sites linked there "follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines" is not required anywhere and nearly no external link there do so. These argument maps can often be useful resources.
arguments structured into a relational diagram formatmake the arguments any more valid? It clearly doesn't. Not unless participants can be shown to have subject-matter expertise. This is nothing more than linkspam for an oddly-structured forum. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The public debates are basically supposed to become a site where people can go and inform themselves. If a debate has over 2,000 unique arguments, it's going to be hard to find an argument that's not in there already. You can go there, similar to Wikipedia, and read.I'm not saying it's encyclopedic despite that one could also view it as a kind of repository/lexicon of associated arguments in society. It may be / seems to be misunderstood what these external links are supposed to be for so if one could make it clearer with the text next to it, one could just edit the template and contextualize it better. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.
Propose merging Template:Unblock-spamun with Template:Unblock-un.
For whatever reason, this template looks and feels the exact same as the latter. kleshkreikne. T 07:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused template. Bad idea. PepperBeast (talk) 01:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
This template is no longer used. (Converted its last transclusion to use Template:Cite Pacer instead.) GoingBatty (talk) 01:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. Parent template uses Navbox documentation. DrChuck68 (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
A gross sea of redlinks. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Content in the template space. Should be substed and deleted, with a potential preferred location - I would recommend Reporters Without Borders - and then linked to a la WP:SUMMARY style from the other places it is currently transcluded instead of being transcluded there. Izno (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This template seems to be for statues installed outside NBA arenas, regardless of whether or not the statues depict NBA players. I do not understand the criteria for inclusion, as there are probably hundreds of statues installed outside NBA arenas. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I think Template:Statues of NBA figures should be kept and Template:NBA Arena Statues should be kept. Template:Statues of NBA figures might become oversized 500 years from now just like many other navboxes on Wiki English. Template:NBA Arena Statues will never be oversized since it is capped at 30 arenas. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Very vertical navbox, only tangentially related to one another. No article on the subject. Would have thought better left for category navigation. --woodensuperman 11:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Is this really the kind of thing we want at the top of an article? It looks strange in a style of a hatnote. It seems something like a tracking category would be more appropriate? DB1729talk 19:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Template for making a bunch of translations. WP:NOTDICTIONARY PepperBeast (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Greek: Αθήνα, romanized: Athína. Now, WP:NOINDICSCRIPT was created as a major exception to this, but that explicitly says it is
excluded from... articles about Hinduism. All of that said, I don't love this template, but I'm also not sure straight deletion makes sense; however, I am open to discussion, especially if anyone has alternate proposals for how to handle this. Brusquedandelion (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Contains only two links outside the main article. Everything else is red. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The deletion requests were already discussed at both Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 16#Template:Non-free Philippines government and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 21#Template:Non-free Philippines government. But the discussions were focused on the disputed nature of the Philippine government works in the Philippine copyright law. Regardless of which is true (PD or copyrighted), it should not matter on English Wikipedia because the wiki does not need to respect the copyright law of the Philippines in the first place. It only needs to respect the copyright law of the United States per lex loci protectionis, and under the U.S. law all Philippine government photographs are public domain, even if they are copyrighted in the Philippines. All Philippine government images should be tagged with {{PD-USGov}} or something similar that reflects to their PD status in the U.S., not in the Philippines. English Wikipedia has a local consensus to not follow the national copyright laws, and only U.S. copyright law matters. This is reflected in the wiki's acceptance of unfree public buildings of the Philippines and other 100+ no-FoP countries courtesy of U.S. copyright law (Template talk:Freedom of panorama (US only)#RFC: Does US FoP apply to foreign works?). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. DB1729talk 20:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. Parent template uses Navbox documentation. DrChuck68 (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
There are really only two articles to link to here, and that's Matt Champion's album and a single from that album, which both link to each other on their articles anyway. He doesn't need a template yet. WP:NENAN. Ss112 13:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused map item that was replaced with Module:Location map/data/Singapore Rail. Gonnym (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused and unlinked from anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 07:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Readded. The template was off the page for about a month.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused. A different table style is used at 2002 NFL season#Final regular season standings. Gonnym (talk) 07:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Single-use templates on their respective articles (Back Bay station and Park Street station). Tabular track layout diagrams of these types were deprecated in 2020: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2020#Closure of 2019 station layout RFC. Park Street has an RDT-style diagram anyway; Back Bay isn't a complex station. Mackensen (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This template is legally void. Text on Wikipedia is licensed under Creative Commons (CC) licenses that allow relicensing under later versions of the licenses, as well as some other specific compatible ones (Free Art, GPLv3). No template can change this fact; contributors agree to the license from the Terms of Use. Best, Frostly (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
or whatever. If your goal is to leave the rendered user page unchanged but trackable, then your proposal is needed, but I wasn't clear which you were going for. I think I might be swayed to support your !vote, maybe even either way, but I think I prefer the hidden code method. Mathglot (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |version=1
, at all existing transclusion sites. Then, conditionally add some phrase like "except as consistent with CC BY-SA or other free licenses that apply". The old version of the text would still appear where it did before (the |version=1
case), while the new version would show for new uses that leave out the version argument.except as consistent with CC BY-SA or other free licenses that applywould change the usefulness of the template. Both CC and GFDL licenses contain relicensing provisions; all content can't be relicensed outside of these provisions. I don't see how the line of text adds anything legally meaningful.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
except as consistent with CC BY-SA or other free licenses that applyto the template. Currently, the template is misleading; that is an actual problem that needs to be fixed. But people are free to put meaningless templates on their userpage. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4. Recently recreated navboxes were deleted unanimously per this discussion. Recent deletion of similar navboxes here shows that appetite has not changed. --woodensuperman 08:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Recent deletion of similar navboxes (...) shows that appetite has not changed.does not sound like an actual reason to delete these templates. SD was declined (see page history). I cannot see the problem with those navboxes.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused graph template. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I researched this thoroughly. Of the scripts include in this info box, only three have any official standing. The rest are just used by convention. PepperBeast (talk) 01:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
associatedwith
every language that has official status at the national or state level in Indiameans X should have an infobox template. Lots of things are associated with lots of other things; you need to show this specific grouping is more natural, useful, or current in the scholarly discussion than other possible groupings.
they wouldn't have dared to imagine that their "negligence" to mention the associated scripts could be construed as not having given official standing to the respective scripts
An official script is a writing system that is specifically designated to be official in the constitutions or other applicable laws of countries, states, and other jurisdictions.
You seem to not understand what "official" is. Handing out information in a language/script does not make that language official,
So we are still at zero WP:RS from you or Pepperbeast.
We are discussing Officially used in the name of the template
If you are unwilling to provide a WP:RS to support your claim, we may stop here.
is used to write the Constitution of India—and yet, even you would not try and include this template on Latin script.
scripts are named in legislative documents only when there are more than one scripts associated with a given languageexplains why some scripts are made official. It does not deny that some scripts are official and others are not, and is this, in fact, an argument for deletion.
Purely exists to present a list of translations/transliterations. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
This recently created infobox template was used on pages where infobox book was previously used (compare: Infobox Latin Bible vs Infobox book). Other than adding latin verses to the infobox for some unclear reason, there isn't that big a difference and this creates yet another template that needs maintenance. Revert the replacments and delete this template. Gonnym (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Unsuitable to have awards navboxes for DVD re-issues, the subject of the links is the film, not the media release. Would only be acceptable if we had articles on the physical media releases themselves. How many more film award navboxes do we need?!? --woodensuperman 12:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Only four links to any articles not including the creators linked above. Both characters' links are to the same article but to the respective section on both the comic series and TV series. And the link to the comic series is featured twice.
Removing the non article links in the first section and the one link to the article section, you would have only three links within the navbox. No navigation is met with this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
The articles on the creators don't count= say what? the articles of the creators are important, which is why they are in the navbox, and why the navbox is in the articles of the creators. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Substantial duplication, all signatories and other related links already included in the "Declaration of Independence" section of {{Historical American Documents}} so no additional navigational benefit. Alternative would be to split {{Historical American Documents}} into its component parts. --woodensuperman 13:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
It had been decided in a discussion at WPWX that the infoboxes for tropical cyclones, storms, and floods would be replaced by Template:Infobox weather event since there are a variety of new features as well as ease of editing with the new infobox. I had been told in the past that a TfD was required to formally deprecate templates and that a RfC was not sufficient enough. I would like to point out that around 90% of infobox tropical cyclone's transclusions have been replaced by this point as have a majority of infobox storm's. Noah, AATalk 16:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
consensus to replace the infoboxes with the new templatewhich should be implemented. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Subjective list, should be deleted for all the same reasons the AFI and Sight and Sound ones were. See discussions here and here --woodensuperman 16:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I am not seeing the "all time per 2008" in Cahiers du Cinéma's Annual Top 10 Lists or Cahiers du Cinéma. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
A list of completed discussions that still require action taken on the template(s) — for example, a merge between two infoboxes — can be found at the "Holding Cell".
For an index of all old and archived discussions, see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives.
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Wiki:Templates for discussion, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.