requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Elliot Rodger
| Black Kite stated there needed to be a discussion before this article can get created. I made this article because Elliot Rodger is the one who shot the incel community into the mainstream and has made people inspired to do attacks like his almost ten years later. [1] [2] [3] [4] There are multiple articles talking about his mental health [5] [6] [7] [8] and Rodger's rampage also inspired and made women talk about sexism and misogyny and stared the hashtag #YesAllWomen. [9] [10] [11] [12]. He also caused the hashtag #NotAllMen, where men said they didn't have the same viewpoints like Rodger and wouldn't murder women because of it. [13] [14] [15] [16]. They also looked into his online life and how he was racist, hated women and talked bad about them, and was already looking to murder these poor college students [17] [18][19]. His rampage also brought forward more calls for gun control and inspired multiple laws that are now enacted [20] [21][22] [23]. Also talked about how mental health sources needed to be updated as well [24] [25] [26]. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2014 Isla Vista killings
| I tried to update the article, but Black Kite said we need a discussion first. A lot of the sources on the article like IMDB are unreliable, a lot of important information is missing from the article, and some information is outdated. I tried to add reliable sources and more info about the attacks and the aftermath. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Julian Assange
| Should we refer to Julian Assange as a journalist? Wikinetman (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:J. K. Rowling
| Should we add Rowling's comments on India Willoughby from March 2024 to the end of the second paragraph of views -> transgender people before the paragraph as a whole is rewritten? I am proposing that we (only) add a short summary of the fact she did misgender Willoughby on Twitter and a short quote of one of the comments she made (see examples I have proposed elsewhere in this talk page). It would have a maximum length of two sentences. Subsequent developments after her comments themselves (police report etc) would not be included. The comments Rowling made on Willoughby in March are separate from those made on several transgender people including Willoughby on April Fools' Day. I'm almost certain her comments in March were the first times Rowling publicly misgendered a trans person. This would not include Rowling's additional recent comments on trans people in Nazi Germany, or other recent (separate) topics related to her views on trans people. 13tez (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Ariana Grande
| Hi fellow editors. The conversation about changing Ariana's photo seems to be going nowhere. From what I can see, there doesn't seem to be any decisions being made but constant edit warring, so I thought starting an RFC would be the best course of action. There are so many images available so I am unsure why this has become a problem but hopefully this speeds things along. Comment below which photo you think the article should to change to and feel free to comment on why! Maxwell King123321 01:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Markos Botsaris
As this talk page shows, there has been an intractable debate on whether the subject should be described as Greek (or Albanian etc) and what spelling his name should have and connected questions. This RfC hopes to solve this issue. The issues are as follows:
Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
| Should the lead say, (a) RFK Jr. is a conspiracy theorist, (b) RFK Jr. promotes conspiracy theories, or (c) avoid both terms in describing his views. TFD (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:StoneToss
| In the Alleged revelation of identity section of the article, the first sentence currently reads: "In March 2024, antifascist internet vigilantes claimed to have revealed the identity of StoneToss using leaked information from Gab, a social media website with a far-right userbase". |
Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet
| There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet as shown in difference Special:Diff/1215143082. Edmund Patrick – confer 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:StoneToss
| Should StoneToss's website be excluded from the article? TarnishedPathtalk 10:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Fani Willis
| Currently the material on the relationship between Fani Willis and Nathan Wade takes up two paragraphs of the Fani Willis#2020 election influence investigation subsection. Refer to Special:Diff/1214511508 for current size of the section at time of writing this RfC.
|
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Tesla, Inc.
| This Rfc comes to resolve an ongoing impasse as to who should be listed as the founders for Tesla Inc. One argument states that only Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning should be designated as the founders because they originally incorporated the company which ultimately became Tesla Inc. Another argument states that Elon Musk, Ian Wright and J.B. Straubel should also be included as founders because a lawsuit settlement agreement stipulated that they should be designated as "co-founders". Bearing this in mind, which figures (if any) should be listed as founders in the infobox section? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:LiveJasmin
The question is whether or not to add the following section, named "Controversy", to the article:
For more background, see discussion threads above as well as initial comments on my talk page User_talk:Alexfotios. Alexfotios (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Governor General of Canada
| Should it be mentioned in the lead, that the governor general is described as Canada's de facto head of state? GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Israel–Hamas war
| Western media outlets (The Washington Post, BBC, El País, The Guardian, CPJ), name it the "Israel–Gaza war";. Should the article mention that in the "Media coverage" section ? If so, could this draft work ? In April 2024 certain Western media outlets called the war as the Israel-Gaza war.[27][28][29][30][31][32] The Washington Post published an article titled "six months of the Israel-Gaza war: a timeline of key moments".[33] BBC explained the history of the conflict, calling it the "Israel-Gaza war".[34] El País called it the "war between Israel and Gaza".[35] The Guardian talked about the "Israel-Gaza war" when analyzing US views.[36] CPJ spoke about the "Israel-Gaza war" by writing about journalist casualties.[37] Deblinis (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Estonia
| An IP user added a description like 'geographiclly located in Northern Europe' in the lede. (1, 2, 3, 4) I think it violates "Lithuania solution", the consensus which is made in the previous talk. (#RfC - The geographic locale of Estonia) I request other users' opinions for this issue. Do you support or oppose to add this description? 117.53.77.84 (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Israel–Hamas war
There are two primary questions.
07:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Djong (ship)
| Hi editors, this is regarding wether the article should include the quote from Zhou Qufei, Lingwai Daida or not. The history of the quote has been disputed on the talk page, since there are no consensus between Merzostin and Nitekuzee, RfC seems to be the best course of action. In light of the source and evidence, it should be determined wether to: Option #1: Keep The Quote Option #2: Remove The Quote Merzostin (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Siege of Khan Yunis
There are several editors in disagreement about how to state the result of the battle. Which option fits best? (Options picked from all previous main-space versions of the result section)
The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
| There is currently an edit dispute on whether Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of states that will likely not receive polling in the 2024 presidential election or have not been polled yet. Option #1: Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of every state he has ballot access in. Option #2: If the aggregate state polling shows Kennedy Jr. under >5% or >10% (whatever is determined by the RFC): then he shouldn't be included. If no polling has been done or he is above 5-10%, then he should be included. Option #3: Kennedy Jr. should not appear in the infobox if polling of the state has not been performed. Thanks! :) KlayCax (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Chola Empire
| The Royal House of the Medieval Cholas has been disputed in This discussion. @Pikachu 9988 has suggested that the imperial Cholas originate from the Pottappi branch. This has been challenged by other users. This has been a subject of various edit wars on related articles. Reviving this discussion for consensus. SKAG123 (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Markos Botsaris
As this talk page shows, there has been an intractable debate on whether the subject should be described as Greek (or Albanian etc) and what spelling his name should have and connected questions. This RfC hopes to solve this issue. The issues are as follows:
Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Reconquista
| With regard to WP:Verifiability, WP:NPOV, and current academic consensus, should the article present the Reconquista as a matter of historical fact at face value or as historiographical narrative? This has been a perennial discussion (such as here), and the article would benefit from some stabilizing, somewhat binding consensus. I am hoping for robust engagement with the latest scholarship and the most reliable sources. إيان (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet
| There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet as shown in difference Special:Diff/1215143082. Edmund Patrick – confer 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Julian Assange
| Should we refer to Julian Assange as a journalist? Wikinetman (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki talk:WikiProject Morocco
| Should Tifinagh transcriptions be included in articles relating to Morocco following the proposal set forth in the WikiProject's previous talk page discussion? NAADAAN (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Havana syndrome
| Three related questions: a) Can this article include non-medical information about Havana Syndrome (provided the information is properly sourced)? Examples of non-medical information include politics, economics, relationship to cold war, espionage, directed energy weapons, statements by foreign governments, conflict-of-interest allegations, and historical chronology of hypotheses & research. Example of non-medical information: Financial compensation from Havana Act and . b) Can this article include USA government reports, studies and statements from the executive branch, US Congress, CIA, Department of Defense, State department, National Institutes of Health, etc. (provided they are reported on by major media)? Specifically, is it okay if some sources are not from medical or scientific journals? Examples of government reports: and . c) For medical information in this article: does WP:MEDRS prohibit the use of primary medical sources in this article? Opposing view: Havana Syndrome is relatively new and evolving so it is okay to use primary medical sources in some situations (for example, when the primary source is widely reported in major media; or when the primary source is reporting a significant new result; or when there are no secondary sources yet available that have reviewed and summarized the primary source). Examples of recent widely-reported primary sources that have not been assessed by a secondary source: and Noleander (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:SpaceX Starship
| Should the SpaceX Starship IFT-3 launch be categorized as (in alphabetical order) a failure, partial failure, or success in the infobox? Redraiderengineer (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Mukokuseki
|
Talk:Julian Assange
| Should we refer to Julian Assange as a journalist? Wikinetman (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
| There is currently an edit dispute on whether Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of states that will likely not receive polling in the 2024 presidential election or have not been polled yet. Option #1: Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of every state he has ballot access in. Option #2: If the aggregate state polling shows Kennedy Jr. under >5% or >10% (whatever is determined by the RFC): then he shouldn't be included. If no polling has been done or he is above 5-10%, then he should be included. Option #3: Kennedy Jr. should not appear in the infobox if polling of the state has not been performed. Thanks! :) KlayCax (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Foals (band)
| Should the nationality in the lead section be represented as English or British? HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Ariana Grande
| Hi fellow editors. The conversation about changing Ariana's photo seems to be going nowhere. From what I can see, there doesn't seem to be any decisions being made but constant edit warring, so I thought starting an RFC would be the best course of action. There are so many images available so I am unsure why this has become a problem but hopefully this speeds things along. Comment below which photo you think the article should to change to and feel free to comment on why! Maxwell King123321 01:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:StoneToss
| In the Alleged revelation of identity section of the article, the first sentence currently reads: "In March 2024, antifascist internet vigilantes claimed to have revealed the identity of StoneToss using leaked information from Gab, a social media website with a far-right userbase". |
Talk:StoneToss
| Should StoneToss's website be excluded from the article? TarnishedPathtalk 10:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| Following both previous discussions at Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315#Is WION a reliable source? and Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 335#WION News, should WION News can be considered as unreliable? 103.230.81.135 (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Space marine
| This page has a fairly large section that takes up about half of the page detailing a list of times that space marines have appeared in fiction. I removed the section on the basis of it being unsourced, WP:FANCRUFT, and for it being an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of WP:TRIVIA. However, this edit was reverted because an editor thought that this section was "very different" from other pop-culture sections. Instead of engaging in an edit war, I would like to make a request for comments to decide if the section should be removed, stay, or if some other solution can be decided on. Thanks. Di (they-them) (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel
I would like to restart a previous RfC on calling the operation a Hamas victory in the infobox. In the interim, multiple other sources ([1], [2]) have supported this position. No consensus was reached in the past RfC however I think the decision then was erroneous. Most of the opponents had no compelling arguments except essentially appeals to emotion that the attacks were "terrorist" and that it would somehow be immoral to call "terrorists" winners. That RfC was further tainted by an e-mail canvassing situation. I believe that the closer erred in his judgement of no consensus.
|
Talk:Governor General of Canada
| Should it be mentioned in the lead, that the governor general is described as Canada's de facto head of state? GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 Iranian strikes in Israel
What should the result section of the infobox say? Leaving out some possible options here, other suggestions are also welcome.
|
Talk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States
| Should the nickname "Genocide Joe" be included on a list of nicknames used for Presidents of the United States? 14:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Brothers of Italy
| On replacing neo-fascism with post-fascism in the ideology section of the info box (both are in the lede). Please read RfC2 and the below post, which is effectively option 4. SUPPORT/OPPOSE for option 4 but wider discussion is welcome and needed. Alexanderkowal (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League's database of hate symbols?
Loki (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding antisemitism?
Loki (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict?
Loki (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Julian Assange
| Should we refer to Julian Assange as a journalist? Wikinetman (talk) 03:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
| There is currently an edit dispute on whether Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of states that will likely not receive polling in the 2024 presidential election or have not been polled yet. Option #1: Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of every state he has ballot access in. Option #2: If the aggregate state polling shows Kennedy Jr. under >5% or >10% (whatever is determined by the RFC): then he shouldn't be included. If no polling has been done or he is above 5-10%, then he should be included. Option #3: Kennedy Jr. should not appear in the infobox if polling of the state has not been performed. Thanks! :) KlayCax (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Havana syndrome
| Three related questions: a) Can this article include non-medical information about Havana Syndrome (provided the information is properly sourced)? Examples of non-medical information include politics, economics, relationship to cold war, espionage, directed energy weapons, statements by foreign governments, conflict-of-interest allegations, and historical chronology of hypotheses & research. Example of non-medical information: Financial compensation from Havana Act and . b) Can this article include USA government reports, studies and statements from the executive branch, US Congress, CIA, Department of Defense, State department, National Institutes of Health, etc. (provided they are reported on by major media)? Specifically, is it okay if some sources are not from medical or scientific journals? Examples of government reports: and . c) For medical information in this article: does WP:MEDRS prohibit the use of primary medical sources in this article? Opposing view: Havana Syndrome is relatively new and evolving so it is okay to use primary medical sources in some situations (for example, when the primary source is widely reported in major media; or when the primary source is reporting a significant new result; or when there are no secondary sources yet available that have reviewed and summarized the primary source). Examples of recent widely-reported primary sources that have not been assessed by a secondary source: and Noleander (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:J. K. Rowling
| Should we add Rowling's comments on India Willoughby from March 2024 to the end of the second paragraph of views -> transgender people before the paragraph as a whole is rewritten? I am proposing that we (only) add a short summary of the fact she did misgender Willoughby on Twitter and a short quote of one of the comments she made (see examples I have proposed elsewhere in this talk page). It would have a maximum length of two sentences. Subsequent developments after her comments themselves (police report etc) would not be included. The comments Rowling made on Willoughby in March are separate from those made on several transgender people including Willoughby on April Fools' Day. I'm almost certain her comments in March were the first times Rowling publicly misgendered a trans person. This would not include Rowling's additional recent comments on trans people in Nazi Germany, or other recent (separate) topics related to her views on trans people. 13tez (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki talk:Political endorsements
In the RfC that this guideline is based on, it seems to be taken for granted that endorsements by notable individuals that are not covered by reliable and independent sources fail the inclusion criteria, but endorsements by notable organizations inherently merit inclusion. Somebody raised this important point in a prior RfC but received no meaningful answer. Here's a more airtight example:
So why the double standard? 97.155.100.43 (talk) 08:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Elissa Slotkin
There has been a lot of discussions on whether or not the language used by Elissa Slotkin should be used in the article when she said:
There has been a lot of contention over the meaning of this quote, with many saying it is anti-union and some saying it is pro-union or mundane. There has also been a debate over many of the sources that have been used quoting her as being anti-union, many of which are deemed reputable by Wikipedia (although there are debates over biases). Considering this, should this quote be characterized or partially included on the article? OrcaLord (talk) 02:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Libertarian Party (Australia)
| Does this source comply with WP:SYNTH is so far as its use in the ideology section of the infobox to label the party conservative? Helper201 (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
| Should the lead say, (a) RFK Jr. is a conspiracy theorist, (b) RFK Jr. promotes conspiracy theories, or (c) avoid both terms in describing his views. TFD (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:StoneToss
| In the Alleged revelation of identity section of the article, the first sentence currently reads: "In March 2024, antifascist internet vigilantes claimed to have revealed the identity of StoneToss using leaked information from Gab, a social media website with a far-right userbase". |
Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet
| There is a question into the validity of a quote in the article Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet as shown in difference Special:Diff/1215143082. Edmund Patrick – confer 08:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:StoneToss
| Should StoneToss's website be excluded from the article? TarnishedPathtalk 10:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Fani Willis
| Currently the material on the relationship between Fani Willis and Nathan Wade takes up two paragraphs of the Fani Willis#2020 election influence investigation subsection. Refer to Special:Diff/1214511508 for current size of the section at time of writing this RfC.
|
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:International Churches of Christ
| Wiki articles about religious organizations often contain a “beliefs” section that describes the beliefs and practices of the organization and its members. Is About Self sourcing on the organization’s beliefs or practices acceptable as Reliable Sourcing when the information is derived directly from the religious organization or published by an employee or member of the organization irrespective of whether secondary sourcing is available? This RfC assumes that all other Wikipedia editing policies are observed. ~~~~ Meta Voyager (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Mukokuseki
|
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League's database of hate symbols?
Loki (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding antisemitism?
Loki (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict?
Loki (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
| There is currently an edit dispute on whether Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of states that will likely not receive polling in the 2024 presidential election or have not been polled yet. Option #1: Kennedy Jr. should appear in the infobox of every state he has ballot access in. Option #2: If the aggregate state polling shows Kennedy Jr. under >5% or >10% (whatever is determined by the RFC): then he shouldn't be included. If no polling has been done or he is above 5-10%, then he should be included. Option #3: Kennedy Jr. should not appear in the infobox if polling of the state has not been performed. Thanks! :) KlayCax (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)
| The lead section first sentence says "The bridge was", in past tense. Should the first sentence be in past tense (Support past tense); or in present tense (Oppose past tense)? -- GreenC 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki talk:WikiProject Morocco
| Should Tifinagh transcriptions be included in articles relating to Morocco following the proposal set forth in the WikiProject's previous talk page discussion? NAADAAN (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Barkley Marathons
| Should Female finishers be recorded separately for the Barkley Marathons? A number of related questions have come up on this article in the past few days due to Jasmin Paris recently becoming the first woman to complete the Barkley Marathons. Most sporting events keep stats separately based on gender but the Barkley Marathons don't make this distinction as they aren't part of any kind of larger organization or used as qualifiers for anything. It's important to note that the table originally came from a discussion on labeling her time as the "slowest finish", a metric often recorded for fixed time races but could be seen as demeaning the first woman to finish the race to outsiders. Input on that subject is also appreciated. PyropePe (talk) 03:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Bokator
| Should the Bokator article mention "The martial art is believed to be the precursor of all forms of kickboxing present in the former provinces of the Khmer empire, namely Kun Khmer in Cambodia, Muay Lao in Laos and Muay Thai in Thailand"? The discussion in the talk page with Gandtha seems to be going nowhere and the aggressivity([38]) is increasing, while the reverts keep on going. Previous consensus on the matter has been reached on the talk page of Muay Thai[39], it was decided not to include contentious journalistic sources but only academic sources. For context regarding the reference (book) cited in the talk page, Bokator led to Muay Korat which led to Muay Boran which itself led to Muay Thai. Pierrevang3 (talk) 14:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| Following both previous discussions at Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315#Is WION a reliable source? and Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 335#WION News, should WION News can be considered as unreliable? 103.230.81.135 (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Talk:Markos Botsaris
As this talk page shows, there has been an intractable debate on whether the subject should be described as Greek (or Albanian etc) and what spelling his name should have and connected questions. This RfC hopes to solve this issue. The issues are as follows:
Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Wiki: Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators
| The purpose of this RfC is to determine the consensus for how creations in violations of general sanctions such as WP:ARBECR should be enforced. Awesome Aasim 04:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Should there be a new R5 criteria for incorrectly formatted redirects to DAB pages? Redirects to disambiguation pages with malformities qualifiers such as Foo (desambiguation), Foo (DISAMBIGUATION) and Foo (Disambiguation), this excludes redirect using the correct WP:INTDAB title namely Foo (disambiguation) or any title that has useful history. Redirects with incorrect qualifiers that don't target disambiguation pages can be deleted under G14.Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:J. K. Rowling
| Should we add Rowling's comments on India Willoughby from March 2024 to the end of the second paragraph of views -> transgender people before the paragraph as a whole is rewritten? I am proposing that we (only) add a short summary of the fact she did misgender Willoughby on Twitter and a short quote of one of the comments she made (see examples I have proposed elsewhere in this talk page). It would have a maximum length of two sentences. Subsequent developments after her comments themselves (police report etc) would not be included. The comments Rowling made on Willoughby in March are separate from those made on several transgender people including Willoughby on April Fools' Day. I'm almost certain her comments in March were the first times Rowling publicly misgendered a trans person. This would not include Rowling's additional recent comments on trans people in Nazi Germany, or other recent (separate) topics related to her views on trans people. 13tez (talk) 23:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki talk:Edit warring
| Should the following proposed insertion to the list of exemptions to the edit warring policy be added? Exemption #9: Reverting edits that have been specified as not edit-warring by a policy or applicable Arbitration Committee ruling. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 16:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Village pump (policy)
| Should ARBPOL be amended to add appealability and submission of questions to U4C? signed, SpringProof talk 04:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Template talk:Infobox person
Should the 2020 consensus to remove |residence= from the Infobox person template be overturned? 4theloveofallthings (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
Wiki: Village pump (policy)
| Currently, the status quo for events listed on the main page is to use the present tense, even if the event in question has definitively ended. I didn't really notice this was an issue until yesterday when I noticed that the main page said that the Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024 is visible through parts of North America. Knowing that it was not currently visible and double checking that the article referred to the event in the past tense, I changed this to was visible. [40] I did not realize that this is against the current consensus at WP:ITNBLURB which says that these events must always be described in the present tense. If one is interested in further background, I encourage them to read this discussion here (scroll down to errors). I think that this status quo is misleading to readers because it cases like this, we are deliberately giving inaccurate and outdated information. I believe this is a disservice to our readers. The eclipse is not visible anymore, yet we must insist that it is indeed visible. I think that we should also be consistent... If the article for a blurb is using the past tense, we should use the past tense on the main page. Therefore, I propose that events listed on ITN that have definitively ended should be described in the past tense if it would otherwise mislead readers into thinking an event is ongoing. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) |
Template talk:Infobox person
Should the 2020 consensus to remove |residence= from the Infobox person template be overturned? 4theloveofallthings (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators
| The purpose of this RfC is to determine the consensus for how creations in violations of general sanctions such as WP:ARBECR should be enforced. Awesome Aasim 04:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League's database of hate symbols?
Loki (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding antisemitism?
Loki (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
Wiki: Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of the Anti-Defamation League regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict?
Loki (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
requests For Comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: (refresh)
 | Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wiki: Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wiki: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wiki: Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wiki: Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article All, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.