Write-In Candidate

A write-in candidate is a candidate whose name does not appear on the ballot but seeks election by asking voters to cast a vote for the candidate by physically writing in the person's name on the ballot.

Depending on electoral law it may be possible to win an election by winning a sufficient number of such write-in votes, which count equally as if the person were formally listed on the ballot.

Writing in a name that is not already on the election ballot is considered a practice of the United States. However, some other jurisdictions have allowed this practice. In the United States, there are variations in laws governing write-in candidates, depending on the office (federal or local) and whether the election is a primary election or the general election; general practice is an empty field close by annotated to explain its purpose on the ballot if it applies. In five U.S. states there are no elections to which it can apply, under their present laws. Election laws are enacted by each state and in the District of Columbia, to apply to their voters.

How to write in the name

Some U.S. states and local jurisdictions allow a voter to affix a sticker, with the write-in candidate's name, to the ballot in lieu of actually writing in the candidate's name.

Write-in candidacies are sometimes a result of a candidate being legally or procedurally ineligible to run under their own name or party; write-in candidacies may be permitted where term limits bar an incumbent candidate from being officially nominated for, or being listed on the ballot for, re-election. They are also typically used when a candidate, often an incumbent has lost a primary election but still wishes to contest the general election.

In some cases, write-in campaigns have been organized to support a candidate who is not personally involved in running; this may be a form of draft campaign.

Write-in candidates may have to register as candidates

Write-in candidates have won elections on rare occasions. Also, write-in votes are sometimes cast for ineligible people or fictional characters.

Some jurisdictions require write-in candidates be registered as official candidates before the election. This is standard in elections with a large pool of potential candidates, as there may be multiple candidates with the same name that could be written in.

The spoiler effect

In some cases, the number of write-in votes cast in an election is greater than the entire margin of victory, suggesting that the write-ins may have been sufficient to tip the balance and change the outcome of the election by creating a spoiler effect.

Primary elections in the United States

Many U.S. states and municipalities allow for write-in votes in a partisan primary election where no candidate is listed on the ballot to have the same functional effect as nominating petitions: for example, if there are no Reform Party members on the ballot for state general assembly and a candidate receives more than 200 write-in votes when the primary election is held (or the other number of signatures that were required for ballot access), the candidate will be placed on the ballot on that ballot line for the general election. In most places, this provision is in place for non-partisan elections as well.

Write-in option in a referendum

A write-in option may occasionally be available in a multiple-choice referendum; for example in the January 1982 Guamanian status referendum.

Contrast from a blank ballot election system

The term "write-in candidate" is used in elections in which names of candidates or parties are preprinted on a paper ballot or displayed on an electronic voting machine. The term is not generally used in elections in which all ballots are blank and thus all voters must write in the names of their preferred candidates. Blank ballot election systems reduce the cost of printing the ballots, but increase the complexity of casting and counting votes. Such systems are used in Japan, and were used in the past in the French Second Republic and in elections in the Philippines from World War II until the 2010 general election. Some systems use a semi-blank ballot, such as Finland, where the voter must fill in a candidate's given number or letter from a separate ballot, but where there is a clear-cut arrangement with a circle or box with a description of how to vote for a given candidate. Blank-ballot systems typically require candidates to be nominated in advance.

United States

Write-In Candidate 
Requirements for write-in candidates in the 2020 United States general election
 Registration not required
 Registration required
 Write-in not allowed for president, registration required for other offices
 Write-in only allowed for substitutes
 Write-in not allowed

The requirements to appear on the general election ballot as an independent candidate or to have write-in votes counted vary by state and by political office sought.

Forty-one states and the District of Columbia allow write-in votes on their ballots, including for president; Arkansas, New Mexico and South Carolina allow write-in candidates for some offices but not for president; Mississippi allows write-in votes only to substitute a candidate listed on the ballot who was removed, withdrew or died; Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Oklahoma and South Dakota do not allow any write-in votes. Most of the jurisdictions allowing write-in votes require that the write-in candidates register by a certain date for their votes to be counted. Typically this registration consists only of a declaration of candidacy, but some states also require signatures of a certain number of voters, additional paperwork or fees. The deadline to register as a write-in candidate is usually later than to petition to be listed on the ballot.

2020 presidential general election

Requirements for independent candidates for president in the 2020 United States general election
State or district Petition to be listed on ballot Registration as write-in candidate Sources
signatures fee deadline signatures fee deadline
Alabama 00005,000 August 20 Registration not required
Alaska 00003,212 August 5 October 29
Arizona 00044,500 September 4 September 24
Arkansas 00001,000 August 3 Write-in not allowed for president
California 00196,964 August 7 October 20
Colorado 00005,000 July 9 July 16
00000,0 $1,000 August 5
Connecticut 00005,250 August 7 October 20
Delaware 00007,131 September 1 September 20
District of Columbia 00000,250 August 5 November 6
Florida 00132,781 July 15 June 30
Georgia 00005,250 $24 June 19 September 8
Hawaii 00004,377 August 5 Write-in not allowed
Idaho 00001,000 August 24 September 11
Illinois 00002,500 July 20 September 3
Indiana 00044,935 June 30 July 6
Iowa 00001,500 August 14 Registration not required
Kansas 00005,000 August 3 $20 October 26
Kentucky 00005,000 $500 September 4 $50 October 23
Louisiana 00005,000 July 22 Write-in not allowed
00000,0 $500 August 21
Maine 00004,000 July 25 September 4
Maryland 00005,000 July 6 October 19
Massachusetts 00010,000 July 28 September 4
Michigan 00030,000 July 16 September 4
Minnesota 00002,000 August 18 October 27
Mississippi 00001,000 $2,500 September 4 Write-in only allowed for substitutes
Missouri 00010,000 July 27 October 23
Montana 00005,000 May 26 September 9
Nebraska 00002,500 August 3 October 23
Nevada 00009,608 $250 August 14 Write-in not allowed
New Hampshire 00003,000 $250 August 5 Registration not required
New Jersey 00000,800 July 27 Registration not required
New Mexico 00003,483 June 25 Write-in not allowed for president
New York 00030,000 July 30 October 13
North Carolina 00071,545 March 3 500 July 21
North Dakota 00004,000 August 31 October 13
Ohio 00005,000 August 5 August 24
Oklahoma 00035,592 July 15 Write-in not allowed
00000,0 $35,000
Oregon 00001,000 August 11 Registration not required
Pennsylvania 00005,000 $200 August 3 Registration not required
Rhode Island 00001,000 September 4 Registration not required
South Carolina 00010,000 July 20 Write-in not allowed for president
South Dakota 00003,388 August 4 Write-in not allowed
Tennessee 00000,275 August 20 September 14
Texas 00089,693 May 11 August 17
Utah 00001,000 $500 August 17 $500 August 31
Vermont 00000,0 August 3 Registration not required
Virginia 00005,000 August 21 October 24
Washington 00001,000 August 7 November 3
West Virginia 00007,144 $2,500 August 3 September 15
Wisconsin 00002,000 August 4 October 20
Wyoming 00004,025 $200 August 24 Registration not required
    Notes

Presidential primary

U.S. Senate

Strom Thurmond (South Carolina, 1954) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska, 2010) are the only U.S. Senate candidates to win an election via write-in and defeat candidates with ballot access.

U.S. House of Representatives

State legislatures

Local government

Other elections

California's Proposition 14 impact on write-in candidates

In 2010, California voters passed Proposition 14 which set up a new election system for the United States Senate, United States House of Representatives, all statewide offices (governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, state treasurer, state controller, attorney general, insurance commissioner, and superintendent of public instruction), California Board of Equalization, and for the California State Legislature. In the system set up by Proposition 14, there are two rounds of voting, and the top two vote-getters for each race in the first round (the primary, held in June 2004 – 2018 and March 2020–present) advance to a second round (the general election, held in November). Proposition 14 specifically prohibits write-in candidates in the second round, and this prohibition was upheld in a court challenge. Another court challenge to the prohibition on write-in candidates in the second round was filed in July 2014.

Although Proposition 14 prohibits write-in candidates in the second round of voting, it has created conditions that can make it easier for write-in candidates in the first round to advance to the second round. This generally happens in elections where only one candidate is listed on the ballot. Since in each race the top two vote-getters from the first round are guaranteed to advance to the second round, if only one candidate is listed on the ballot, a write-in candidate can easily advance to the second round, as the write-in candidate would only have to compete with other write-in candidates for the second spot, not with any listed candidates. In some jungle primary systems, if the winner in the first round wins by more than 50% of the vote, then the second (runoff) round gets cancelled, but in the system set up by Proposition 14, a second (runoff) round is required regardless of the percent of the vote that the winner of the first round received. Proposition 14 therefore guarantees that if only one candidate is listed on the ballot in the first round, a write-in candidate running against the one listed candidate can earn a spot for the second round with as little as one vote.

The first election in which Proposition 14 went into effect was the 2012 elections.

Other countries

With a few exceptions, the practice of recognizing write-in candidates is typically viewed internationally as a tradition in the United States.

  • A bizarre incident involving a fictitious write-in candidacy occurred in the small town of Picoazá, Ecuador, in 1967. A company ran a series of campaign-themed advertisements for a foot powder called Pulvapies. Some of the slogans used included "Vote for any candidate, but if you want well-being and hygiene, vote for Pulvapies", and "For Mayor: Honorable Pulvapies". The foot powder Pulvapies ended up receiving the most votes in the election.
  • In Brazil, until the introduction of electronic voting in 1994, the ballot had no names written for legislative candidates, so many voters would protest by voting on fictional characters or religious figures. In a famous case, the São Paulo city zoo rhinoceros Cacareco got around 100,000 votes in the 1959 elections for the municipal council, more than any candidate. However, those votes were not considered because Brazilian law stipulates that a candidate must be affiliated to a political party to take office.
  • Until 2013, write-in candidates were permitted at municipal elections in France for councils of communes with a population of less than 2500.
  • Elections in Sweden are open list, with voters placing into the ballot box an envelope containing their choice of either a ballot preprinted with the name of a registered party or else a blank ballot on which they write the name of a party (registered or unregistered) and optionally that of a candidate. A person must consent to being a candidate listed on a preprinted ballot, but there was no such obligation for write-in names until the 2018 general election. In the 2006 municipal elections, the Sweden Democrats (SD) won seats on several councils where they had no nominee or preprinted ballots; most SD voters wrote the party name but no candidate name. The seats were filled by the name most often written, if any, and left empty if no voter wrote in a name. One example was Vårgårda Municipality, where only 3 of 143 SD voters wrote in names, of which two were for an ineligible non-resident; the winner resigned his seat as he opposed the SD and his sole vote was cast by his father as a joke. In 2010 one Jimmy Åkesson was elected to Staffanstorp Municipality council after a single SD voter wrote his name. The voter apparently intended SD leader Jimmie Åkesson, not resident in Staffanstorp.
  • In elections in Austria, writing on a ballot paper does not invalidate a vote provided the voter's preference is clear. In the 1990 legislative election the unpopular SPÖ, worried that voters would not select it on the party-list ballot, advised them to write in the name of Franz Vranitzky, its popular leader. Such ballots would be interpreted as SPÖ votes.

Protest

  • Mad magazine satirically called to vote for Alfred E. Neuman as a write-in candidate for every U.S. presidential election from 1956 to 1980 with slogans like "You could do worse– you always have!" and "There are bigger idiots running for office!".
  • In the 1980 U.S. presidential election, guitarist Joe Walsh ran a mock write-in campaign, promising to make his song "Life's Been Good" the new national anthem if he won, and running on a platform of "Free Gas for Everyone". Though Walsh (then aged 33) was not old enough to actually assume the office, he wanted to raise public awareness of the election. (In 1992, Walsh purportedly ran for vice-president, in his song "Vote For Me", a track on his album Songs for a Dying Planet, which was released that year.)
  • During the 2000 United States Congress Elections, film-maker Michael Moore led a campaign for voters to submit a ficus tree as a write-in candidate. This campaign was replicated across the country and was recounted in an episode of The Awful Truth.
  • In 2012, a campaign was waged to write in Charles Darwin against Georgia congressman Paul Broun (who was running unopposed) after Broun "called evolution and other areas of science 'lies straight from the pit of hell.'" Darwin received approximately 4,000 votes. However, because Darwin was not registered as an official candidate (some states require even write-ins to be pre-registered), the Georgia Secretary of State did not tabulate those votes.
  • In 2016, several grassroots campaigns to elect Bernie Sanders President as a write-in candidate were established on social media in the run-up to the United States presidential election. Though Sanders continued to campaign for Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, supporters pointed to alleged DNC bias in the Democratic Party's presidential primaries against Sanders, and Clinton's email scandal, and continued to support him. Both Clinton and Donald Trump would have had to win less than the required 270 electoral college votes for Sanders to have denied either candidate the presidency, and for the election to be passed to the House of Representatives – thus the initial write-in campaign around Vermont, offering only three college votes, was not successful, but Sanders did receive almost six percent of the vote there. The campaign expanded to include all 12 eligible states (one of which listed Sanders as an official write-in candidate), and relied on states such as California, with a high electoral college vote count and large support for Sanders, to be successful in denying both Trump and Clinton.
  • In Sweden, all handwritten votes are scanned by computer and the results published online, although only votes for valid parties count towards determining successful candidates. In the 2010 general election, ineffective votes included 120 for Donald Duck and 2 for "myself", as well as several computer code snippets apparently intended as code injection attacks aimed at either the program which tallied the votes or the browsers of users who accessed the results website.
  • In the 2018 Egyptian presidential election, owing to a large number of candidates being arrested or barred from running, Egyptian football star Mohamed Salah received over a million votes, as many Egyptians cancelled out the names of both candidates and wrote his instead. This was higher than the number of votes received by the second place candidate, Moussa Mostafa Moussa. Write-in votes are not deemed valid in Egypt.

See also

Notes

References

This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Write-in candidate, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.

Tags:

Write-In Candidate How to write in the nameWrite-In Candidate Write-in candidates may have to register as candidatesWrite-In Candidate The spoiler effectWrite-In Candidate Primary elections in the United StatesWrite-In Candidate Write-in option in a referendumWrite-In Candidate Contrast from a blank ballot election systemWrite-In Candidate United StatesWrite-In Candidate Other countriesWrite-In Candidate ProtestWrite-In Candidate

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

Article 370 (film)Soviet UnionDune MessiahDonte DiVincenzoPaveway IVAaron MotenUkraineFrom the river to the seaCasualties of the Russo-Ukrainian WarAsian Saga2020 United States presidential electionLondonJoe BidenDawn of the Planet of the ApesList of James Bond filmsShogun (disambiguation)Artificial intelligence2024 Indian general electionKim Jong UnSwitzerlandMS DhoniNicolas CageTyrese MaxeyTottenham Hotspur F.C.Kobe BryantFallout 3Jeffrey EpsteinMeta PlatformsJennifer GarnerAaron Taylor-JohnsonMaldivesKysre GondrezickManjummel BoysList of constituencies of the Lok SabhaVenus WilliamsWorld Chess Championship 2024Chennai Super KingsTheodore RooseveltUEFA Champions LeaguePirates of the Caribbean (film series)Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general electionNarendra ModiIker MuniainZack SnyderMark WahlbergJoel Embiid2024 Mutua Madrid Open – Men's singlesMarlon BrandoTitan (moon)GermanyBitcoin protocolWashington, D.C.Black Sails (TV series)Jack AntonoffAnthony Edwards (basketball)House of the DragonEmma StoneNewcastle United F.C.Millie Bobby BrownFacebookFC BarcelonaBBC World ServiceCarlos TevezSydney SweeneyJimmy CarterFallout 76Prince (musician)Terry HillJayden DanielsPassoverJodie ComerSam PitrodaMike TysonList of prime ministers of IndiaMax VerstappenAbdul FatawuLiverpool F.C.🡆 More