World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations

The World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations is a working party (WP.29) of the Inland Transport Committee (ITC) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).

Its responsibility is to manage the multilateral Agreements signed in 1958, 1997 and 1998 concerning the technical prescriptions for the construction, approval of wheeled vehicles as well as their Periodic Technical Inspection and, to operate within the framework of these three Agreements to develop and amend UN Regulations, UN Global Technical Regulations and UN Rules, kind of vehicle regulation.

World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)
AbbreviationWP.29
Formation1952
TypeWorking Party
Legal statusActive
Head
Italy Antonio Erario (2021-)
Parent organization
UNECE Inland Transport Committee
WebsiteUNECE Transport - WP29

WP.29 was established in June 1952 as the "Working Party of experts on technical requirement of vehicles", while its current name was adopted in 2000.

At its inception, WP.29 had a broader European scope. Since 2000, the global scope of this forum was recognized given the active participation of Countries in all continents, excluding the United States and Canada, who developed incompatible standards.

The forum works on regulations covering vehicle safety, environmental protection, energy efficiency and theft-resistance.

This work affects de facto vehicle design and facilitates international trade.

Organization

There are six permanent Working Parties which are subsidiary bodies that consider specialized tasks, consisting of people with a specific expertise:

  • Noise and Tyres (GRBP)
  • Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE)
  • Pollution and Energy (GRPE)
  • Automated and Connected Vehicles (GRVA)
  • General Safety Provisions (GRSG)
  • Passive Safety (GRSP)

1958 Agreement

The core of the Forum's work is based around the "1958 Agreement", formally titled "Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions" (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2, amended on 16 October 1995). This forms a legal framework wherein participating countries (contracting parties) agree on a common set of technical prescriptions and protocols for type approval of vehicles and components. These were formerly called "UNECE Regulations" or, less formally, "ECE Regulations" in reference to the Economic Commission for Europe. However, since many non-European countries are now contracting parties to the 1958 Agreement, the regulations are officially entitled "UN Regulations". According to the mutual recognition principle set in the Agreement, each Contracting Party's Type Approvals are recognised by all other Contracting Parties.

Participating countries

World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 

Formally signing the 1958 Agreement was possible till June 30 of that year, and five countries chose to do so: Italy (March 28), Netherlands (March 30), West Germany (June 19), France (June 26), and Hungary (June 30). Sweden and Belgium acceded soon after. Originally, the agreement allowed participation of ECE member countries only, but in 1995 the agreement was revised to allow non-ECE members to participate. Current participants include the European Union and its member countries, as well as non-EU UNECE members such as Norway, Russia, Ukraine, Serbia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Turkey and Azerbaijan, and even remote territories such as South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia.

Contracting parties to the 1958 Agreement are referenced by a Distinguishing Number, historically corresponding to the chronological order in which the countries became such member parties. As of 2022, the participants of the Agreement, with their Distinguishing Number, were:

Dist. Number Country Effective date Notes
1 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Germany 28 January 1965
2 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  France 20 June 1959
3 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Italy 26 April 1963
4 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Netherlands 29 August 1960
5 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Sweden 20 June 1959
6 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Belgium 5 September 1959
7 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Hungary 2 July 1960
8 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Czech Republic 1 January 1993 (formerly Czechoslovakia)
9 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Spain 10 October 1961
10 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Serbia 12 March 2001 (formerly Yugoslavia)
11 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  United Kingdom 16 March 1963
12 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Austria 11 May 1971
13 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Luxembourg 12 December 1971
14 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations   Switzerland 28 August 1973
16 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Norway 4 April 1975
17 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Finland 17 September 1976
18 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Denmark 20 December 1976
19 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Romania 21 February 1977
20 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Poland 13 March 1979
21 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Portugal 28 March 1980
22 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Russian Federation 17 February 1987
23 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Greece 5 December 1992
24 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Ireland 24 March 1998
25 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Croatia 8 October 1991
26 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Slovenia 25 June 1991
27 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Slovakia 1 January 1993
28 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Belarus 2 July 1995
29 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Estonia 1 May 1995
30 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Republic of Moldova 20 November 2016
31 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 March 1992
32 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Latvia 18 January 1999
34 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Bulgaria 21 January 2000
35 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Kazakhstan 8 January 2011
36 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Lithuania 29 March 2002
37 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Turkey 27 February 1996
39 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Azerbaijan 14 June 2002
40 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  North Macedonia 17 November 1991
41 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Andorra 11.04.2023
42 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  European Union 24 March 1998
43 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Japan 24 November 1998
45 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Australia 25 April 2000
46 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Ukraine 30 June 2000
47 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  South Africa 17 June 2001
48 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  New Zealand 26 January 2002
49 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Cyprus 1 May 2004
50 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Malta 1 May 2004
51 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  South Korea 31 December 2004
52 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Malaysia 4 April 2006
53 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Thailand 1 May 2006
54 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Albania 5 November 2011
55 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Armenia 30 April 2018
56 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Montenegro 3 June 2006
57 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  San Marino 26 January 2016
58 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Tunisia 1 January 2008
60 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Georgia 25 May 2015
62 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Egypt 3 February 2013
63 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Nigeria 18 October 2018
64 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Pakistan 24 April 2020
65 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Uganda 22.10.2022
66 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Philippines 02.01.2023
67 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Viet Nam 26.07.2023
68 World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations  Kyrgyzstan 01.09.2023

Most countries, even if not formally participating in the 1958 agreement, recognise the UN Regulations and either mirror the UN Regulations' content in their own national requirements, or permit the import, registration, and use of UN type-approved vehicles, or both. The United States and Canada (apart from Lighting Regulations) are the two significant exceptions; the UN Regulations are generally not recognised and UN-compliant vehicles and equipment are not authorised for import, sale, or use in the two regions, unless they are tested to be compliant with the region's car safety laws, or for limited non driving use (e.g. car show displays).

Type approval

World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 
Two types of approval mark: top - according to UN regulations, bottom - according to EU regulations (or directives)

The 1958 Agreement operates on the principles of type approval and reciprocal recognition. Any country that accedes to the 1958 Agreement has authority to test and approve any manufacturer's design of a regulated product, regardless of the country in which that component was produced. Each individual design from each individual manufacturer is counted as one individual type. Once any acceding country grants a type approval, every other acceding country is obliged to honor that type approval and regard that vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment as legal for import, sale and use. Items type-approved according to a UN Regulation are marked with an E and a Distinguishing Number, within a circle. This number indicates which country approved the item, and other surrounding letters and digits indicate the precise version of the regulation met and the type approval number, respectively.

Although all countries' type approvals are legally equivalent, there are real and perceived differences in the rigour with which the regulations and protocols are applied by different national type approval authorities. Some countries have their own national standards for granting type approvals, which may be more stringent than called for by the UN regulations themselves. Within the auto parts industry, a German (E1) type approval, for example, is regarded as a measure of insurance against suspicion of poor quality or an undeserved type approval.

UN Regulations

As of 2015, there are 135 UN Regulations appended to the 1958 Agreement; most regulations cover a single vehicle component or technology. A partial list of current regulations applying to passenger cars follows (different regulations may apply to heavy vehicles, motorcycles, etc.)

General lighting

  • R3 — Retroreflecting devices
  • R4 — Illumination of rear registration plates
  • R6 — Direction indicators
  • R7 — Front and rear position lamps, stop lamps and end-outline marker lamps
  • R19 — Front fog lamps
  • R23 — Reversing lights
  • R37 — Filament lamps (bulbs) (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R38 — Rear fog lamps
  • R48 — Installation of lighting and light-signalling devices
  • R77 — Parking lamps
  • R87 — Daytime running lamps
  • R91 — Side marker lamps
  • R112 — Headlamp Asymmetric
  • R119 — Cornering lamps
  • R123 — AFS lamps
  • R128 — LED light sources

Headlamps

  • R1 — Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam, equipped with R2 or HS1 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R5 — Sealed Beam headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam
  • R8 — Headlamps equipped with replaceable single-filament tungsten-halogen bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R20 — Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with halogen double-filament H4 bulbs (superseded by R112, but still valid for existing approvals)
  • R31 — Halogen sealed beam headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam
  • R45 — Headlamp cleaners
  • R98 — Headlamps equipped with gas-discharge light sources
  • R99 — Gas-discharge light sources for use in approved gas-discharge lamp units of power-driven vehicles (See: Automotive lamp types)
  • R112 — Headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with filament bulbs
  • R113 — Headlamps emitting a symmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with filament bulbs

Instrumentation/controls

  • R35 — arrangement of foot controls
  • R39 — speedometer equipment
  • R46 — rear-view mirrors
  • R79 — steering equipment
  • R160 — event data recorder

Crashworthiness

  • R11 — door latches and door retention components
  • R13-H — braking (passenger cars)
  • R13 — braking (trucks and busses)
  • R14 — safety belt anchorages
  • R16 — safety belts and restraint systems
  • R17 — seats, seat anchorages, head restraints
  • R27 — advance-warning triangles
  • R42 — front and rear protective devices (bumpers, etc.)
  • R43 — safety glazing materials and their installation on vehicles
  • R94 — protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision
  • R95 — protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision
  • R116 — protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use
  • R129 — enhanced child restraint systems (ECRS)

Environmental compatibility

  • R10 — electromagnetic compatibility
  • R15 — emissions and fuel consumption (superseded by R83, R84 and R101)
  • R24 — engine power measurement, smoke emissions, engine type approval
  • R51 — noise emissions
  • R68 — measurement of the maximum speed
  • R83 — emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements
  • R84 — measurement of fuel consumption
  • R85 — electric drive trains — measurement of the net power and the maximum 30 minutes power of electric drive trains
  • R100 — approval of battery electric vehicles with regard to specific requirements for the construction, Functional Safety and hydrogen emission.
  • R101 — measurement of the emission of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption
  • R117 — approval limits for pass-by noise, wet grip, and rolling resistance. These values are also used on the tyre label

Tyres and wheels

  • R30 — Tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R54 — Tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R64 — Temporary use spare unit, run flat tyres, run flat-system
  • R75 — Tyres for motorcycles/mopeds
  • R88 — Retroreflective tyres for two-wheeled vehicles
  • R106 — Tyres for agricultural vehicles
  • R108 — Retreaded tyres for passenger cars and their trailers
  • R109 — Retreaded tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
  • R124 — Replacement wheels for passenger cars
  • R141 — Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS)

Automated/autonomous and connected vehicle regulations

Brake

North America

The most notable non-signatory to the 1958 Agreement is the United States, which has its own Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and does not recognise UN type approvals. However, both the United States and Canada are parties to the 1998 Agreement. UN-specification vehicles and components which do not also comply with the US regulations therefore cannot be imported to the US without extensive modifications. Canada has its own Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, broadly similar to the US FMVSS, but Canada does also accept UN-compliant headlamps and bumpers. The impending Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union could see Canada recognise more UN Regulations as acceptable alternatives to the Canadian regulations. Canada currently applies 14 of the 17 ECE main standards as allowable alternatives[citation needed] - the exceptions at this point relate to motorcycle controls and displays, motorcycle mirrors, and electronic stability control for passenger cars.[citation needed] These three remaining groups will be allowed in Canada by the time the ratification of the trade deal occurs.[citation needed]

Grey Market (1976-88)

World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 
1981 Lamborghini Countach LP 400S sold new in the United States via the grey market

Vehicles built in compliance with global safety and emissions regulations were still available to Americans in the period 1976-88, as individual imports. This was via the grey market. Many of the finest, iconic automobiles of the Malaise era, such as the Lamborghini Countach, Mercedes-Benz 500 SEL, Mercedes-Benz G-Class and Range Rover were officially forbidden to Americans, but this outlet proved viable for many years. The grey market reached 66,900 vehicles imported by individual consumers in 1985, and altered to meet U.S. design regulations. It is no longer possible to import vehicle into the United States as a personal import, with four exceptions, none of which permits Americans to buy recent vehicles not officially available in the United States. Even prominent billionaire Bill Gates and his Porsche 959 have proven unable.

Self-certification

Rather than a UN-style system of type approvals, the US and Canadian auto safety regulations operate on the principle of self-certification, wherein the manufacturer or importer of a vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment certifies—i.e., asserts and promises—that the vehicle or equipment complies with all applicable federal or Canada Motor Vehicle Safety, bumper and antitheft standards. No prior verification is required by a governmental agency or authorised testing entity before the vehicle or equipment can be imported, sold, or used. If reason develops to believe the certification was false or improper — i.e., that the vehicle or equipment does not in fact comply — then authorities may conduct tests and, if a noncompliance is found, order a recall and/or other corrective and/or punitive measures. Vehicle and equipment makers are permitted to appeal such penalties, but this is a difficult direction. Non-compliances found that are arguably without effect to highway safety may be petitioned to skip recall (remedy and notification) requirements for vehicles already produced.

Regulatory differences

World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 
A comparison of European (top) and US (bottom) headlamp configuration on similar-year Citroën DS cars

Historically, one of the most conspicuous differences between UN and US regulations was the design and performance of headlamps. The Citroën DS shown here illustrates the large differences in headlamps during the 1940-1983 era when US regulations required sealed beam headlamps, which were prohibited in many European countries. A similar approach was evident with the US mandatory side marker lights.

1998 Agreement

The "Agreement concerning the Establishing of Global Technical Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles", or 1998 Agreement, is a subsequent agreement. Following its mission to harmonize vehicle regulations, the UNECE solved the main issues (Administrative Provisions for Type approval opposed to self-certification and mutual recognition of Type Approvals) preventing non-signatory Countries to the 1958 Agreement to fully participate to its activities.

The 1998 Agreement is born to produce meta regulations called Global Technical Regulations without administrative procedures for type approval and so, without the principle of mutual recognition of Type Approvals. The 1998 Agreement stipulates that Contracting Parties will establish, by consensus vote, United Nations Global Technical Regulations (UN GTRs) in a UN Global Registry. The UN GTRs contain globally harmonized performance requirements and test procedures. Each UN GTR contains extensive notes on its development. The text includes a record of the technical rationale, the research sources used, cost and benefit considerations, and references to data consulted. The Contracting Parties use their nationally established rulemaking processes when transposing UN GTRs into their national legislation. The 1998 Agreement currently has 33 Contracting Parties and 14 UN GTRs that have been established into the UN Global Registry. Manufacturers and suppliers cannot use directly the UN GTRs as these are intended to serve the Countries and require transposition in national or regional law.

2013 Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (proposed)

As part of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the issues of divergent standards in automobile regulatory structure are being investigated. TTIP negotiators are seeking to identify ways to narrow the regulatory differences, potentially reducing costs and spurring additional trade in vehicles.

OICA

Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d'Automobiles (OICA) hosts on its web site the working documents from various United Nations expert groups including World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.

See also

References

Tags:

World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations OrganizationWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 1958 AgreementWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations North AmericaWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations Regulatory differencesWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 1998 AgreementWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations 2013 Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (proposed)World Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations OICAWorld Forum For Harmonization Of Vehicle Regulations

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

Cole HauserLeo VaradkarYellowjackets (TV series)Florida Atlantic Owls men's basketballConor McGregor1923 (TV series)Brock LesnarGenghis Khan2023 French pension reform strikesRonald ReaganDiana, Princess of WalesDua LipaLeonardo da VinciGuanoList of prime ministers of IndiaHannah WaddinghamThailandTom HanksThe Mandalorian (season 3)Caitlin ClarkEngland national football teamTupac ShakurJayson MolumbyPenn BadgleyMidjourneyKaley CuocoLuxembourgBen Foster (footballer)Wrexham A.F.C.OpenAIClaudia KarvanMain PageList of school shootings in the United States (2000–present)Goliad massacreJared Fogle2023Cocaine BearJohn WickStellan SkarsgårdVande Bharat ExpressSpainHoward HughesI See You (2019 film)Georgia (country)The WeekndOpinion polling for the next United Kingdom general electionBette DavisSteven TylerDemi MooreAndrew TateChernobyl disasterSuccession (TV series)InstagramChris PineMike TysonSoviet UnionChatGPTRaghav ChadhaKelly ReillyFast XCharles BarkleySnoop DoggJoaquin PhoenixGordon MooreLaura HaddockUEFA European Championship qualifyingThe Whale (2022 film)Pablo EscobarManchester United F.C.Stuart HoggAir Pollution IndexGreat ExpectationsRina SawayamaNetflixUSS Princess MatoikaKellie-Jay Keen-MinshullMicrosoft Office MixLeBron James2020 United States presidential election🡆 More