This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Desired outcome of RFC - That the community either proceed to develop this article appropriately, or use this RFC as a de facto AFD and delete.
Opening argument - I created this page with considerable self doubt, hence the article currently exists as a one line stub. I do not see the value of expanding the article until there is consensus that the activity is even worthwhile.
There are arguments both for and against this subject.
Arguments for:
Arguments against:
Please feel free to expand the above criteria. Manning (talk) 23:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Second, you ask us to analyze whether or not Wikipedia should report celebrity death hoaxes. Judging by some of the comments on the talk pages for the Rick Astley and Jeff Goldblum articles, I assume you're asking whether or not we should be pro-active in combating death hoaxes. While I don't think it's necessary to put a banner at the top of the article that says, "Jeff Goldblum is still alive. You suck at the Internet.", other measures can be taken. For instance, when a celebrity death hoax is disseminated, people flock to Wikipedia in droves to see if it's true. Worse still, if the reader believes it is true, they will try and edit the article so they can claim to be the first one to report so-and-so's death on Wiki English. Such action is incredibly disruptive and, while not warranting preventive measures such as blocks for the misinformed reader, does warrant swift page protection and monitoring by administrators.
Sometimes we forget that the edits we make are actually read by thousands of people. As a top ten website, we need to be aware of our actions and the impact they can have on the offline world. That said, I strongly disagree with any assessment that we bear any responsibility for the perpetuation of celebrity death hoaxes. We do the best that we can do. We should not scrub the encyclopedia of any mention of celebrity death hoaxes; to do so would be the editorial equivalent of covering one's eyes like a child and pretending that if you can't see something, it's not there.
These things happen, they're widely reported on, and they're frequently (though not always) notable. The community should exercise more caution as to how much weight we give them in articles (the aforementioned Abe Vigoda example, for example, should carry more weight within Abe's article than George Clooney's death hoax should in George's article), but we should not make a concerted effort to weed them out of our articles. --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 02:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
I expected a greater response to the RFC, but oh well. As a result I have commenced article development regardless of policy. I'm most concerned about crossing the line into WP:NOR, so will tread carefully. Manning (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Why did the real deaths of McMahon, Fawcett and Jackson in quick succession encourage so many people to make false claims that other celebrities had just died? That a similar thing was done when FDR died only tells us that the phenomenon is not unique; it tells us nothing of the motivation of the hoaxers, nor why real famous deaths would make many people want to spread lies that other, living celebs have died. I would have though that the opposite would be the case - that when no famous people had died for weeks / months that people would be bored that no-one famous had died, so might falsely delcare a death to get readers and public attention by pretending they are the first to break news of a celeb death after such a long time since the last real one. Surely people in the media and those interested in celebrities and death would have been much busier than usual in late June 2009, documenting real famous deaths, so would not have time to make stuff up, nor would want to prioritise bullshit, when there is a great deal more real reporting to be done than usual. Biographies 2 (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
When a person is falsely declared dead, why is it so often an unusual cause, such as drowning or falling off a cliff / mountain? Why don't the hoaxers claim much more common causes, such as heart disease, stroke or lung cancer? Biographies 2 (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I thought I was having a stroke while reading the intro paragraph. And there are other places throughout that are just a bizarre jumbled mess of words. I dont even want to begin trying to correct this. Is someone vandalizing or making a legit attempt to contribute here? lethalenoki (talk) 22:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:Death hoax, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.