91St Academy Awards
um why are some of the nominations bolded? pretty sure the winners have NOT been announced yet.
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jgwilliams873 in topic Multiple Awards/Nominations Tables
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 91st Academy Awards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | 91st Academy Awards is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wiki community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nominations
I have changed the nominations to reflect this RoboBongoCuckooCop (talk)
why are winners double marked?
it states: Winners are listed first, highlighted in boldface, and indicated with a double dagger (‡)
- why? is bold not enough? who is able to see the small (‡) at the end of a bold line?
- what is the benefit of it?
- (I would remove the double dagger)
thanks for reasons, -- 178.239.74.16 (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- You make a good point. I am not 100% sure, but I think this has something to do with Wikipedia's "rules" for "accessibility". In other words, some readers have difficulty seeing. So, we can't just use different colors to differentiate winners from nominees. So, they typically include some sort of symbol. In this case, the double dagger. I believe this is the reasoning behind it. To comply with the Wikipedia rules for accessibility by all readers. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:10, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Here are all the details: Wiki: Manual of Style/Accessibility. And, here are some more: Wiki: Accessibility dos and don'ts. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay looks likes the winners have pages, but...
Some are just redirects to the films, like for example the sound editors of Bohemian Rhapsody are just redirects. I think someone probably should turn those into pages sometime. (I'm looking up who has yet to have pages go up, someone mentioned the film editor of Green Book earlier, yes I'm aware that is not a winner but there are some noms without pages.) Wgolf (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Multiple Awards/Nominations Tables
Can someone please add tables with films that won multiple awards and nominations? If you need assistance getting the list started, Bohemian Rhapsody had the most wins, while Roma and The Favourite shared the most nominations. Jgwilliams873 (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:91st Academy Awards, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.