It seems to me that if one ignores specific rules, they can sometimes be stopped from changing Simple English Wiki Simple English.
If one is in an edit war with a vandal, it makes sense that the vandal is blocked from changing Wikipedia, and the non-vandal is ignoring the three-revert-rule to keep the article un-vandalized. If one has had a history of making unhelpful changes, and has been blocked forever from changing Wikipedia, they may reconsider what they have done and make a new account so he can make helpful edits. The creation of a new account is against the no socking rule, but he is wishing to improve Wikipedia, but the no socking rule is preventing him from doing that. So he ignores the no socking rule, but if someone finds out that he is a sockpuppet of the blocked user, he is in trouble, and the ignore all rules rule doesn't seem to work or apply in this case. --67.162.203.107 (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Another thing; IAR can be used as an excuse to add copyrighted works on Wikipedia and disobey the copyright policy. So there must be exceptions to the IAR policy. --67.162.203.107 (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia Simple English article Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki Simple English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.