The reason it shouldn't have Oklahoma after it is that it's understood that Oklahoma City is in Oklahoma State.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The reason why other city articles do it, for the most part, is because the word is not exclusive to them. Having the state at the end is there only to ensure that there's no confusion, because in many cases, the city's name cannot be at simply the city, either because other cities use that name, or because the name is based on a word with another meaning - however, Oklahoma City has no problem with this, as it is the only usage of Oklahoma City, and it lacks any expectation that another "Oklahoma City" will pop up. Thus, should not need to have a disambig. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Done I've fixed the code for you per your request on Eptalon's talk page. - tholly --Turnip-- 17:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Please see my comment to you at the bottom of Wiki: Proposed_good_articles#Comments_3. —Giggy 04:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind my rewrite of this article because of the fact that I need to make sure that each one of the county articles for the counties in Romania have as much information as it possibly can so that I can get Romania up to VGA status. I also rewrote it to make it look like the other county pages that I have created myself. If you disagree with this rewrite, feel free to respond to my move by telling me what you think I should have done differently on my talk page. If it is about the removal of some of the content, the reason for that is because it was a bit too technical for what my goals are with Romania currently. Feel free to re-add back in some of the material that you created the article with, but please make sure to leave what I added to the article there because it is important information :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You haz email :) Cheers, Razorflame 01:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
What are you talking about? I don't write articles about Rivers? ThePageChanger! 19:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Since you wanted one, here you go!
Thanks! I guess I've just kind of drifted away from this site, especially after becoming an admin on en.wiki. I know someone on the English Wikipedia who is working on a computer program which (I hope) will greatly simplify the task of "translating" articles from en.wiki to simple.wiki. He is, as far as I know, almost ready to release his first beta version for public use, so I may become more active here soon. I guess the main reason I don't come here more is because I like fighting vandalism more than anything else, and the pace here, to someone who is used to en.wiki, is almost intolerably slow, and just fighting vandalism here is almost completely pointless.
Anyways, good luck with your RFA. I'll probably drop by and !vote in it if/when you run. Cheers! J.delanoy talkchanges 03:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
About my RfA: It will happen, although the date is not set yet. I will probably set it for sometime late in this month or early next month, but I am uncertain as of yet because I myself only just got back from a two week long break. I have to regain their trust and respect before I can run one successfully :)
Thanks for the reply and hope you are doing well too. Cheers, Razorflame 23:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I really appreciate your efforts. At present I am checking and finalizing the information posted, but I really would like to help, not only in articles about rivers, but other articles too. I am reluctant to do this because I am not sure I understand the rationale of simple english and would hate to mess up things instead of improving them. I assume that simple english is meant for people who do not know english very well. This does not imply that the are interested only in basic information, for instance that George Washington was a general and the first president of the United States; they would like to know much more provided that the words used to explain this are not beyond their level of comprehension. However, I am not sure I would be able to write a longer article in simple english, because I am not aware of the language constraints. Is there any place where I can find those rules so that I can help efficiently? Thanks in advance.Afil (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks againAfil (talk) 02:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
You haz email. — American Eagle (talk) 02:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Yep, I'm online. Anything you need? :) --TBC 03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
As a side note, I know that you are quite new to the Simple English Wikipedia, and other editors on this site know that I am the person who is writing all of the Romanian Rivers articles on here and they know not to help me out because I like working at my own pace, but since you are quite new to this site, I would just like to ask if you could please allow me to work at my own pace creating the Romanian River articles. It is a project that I have started working on back in March or so of this year, and I am still working on it, so if you could please allow me to work on it at my own pace and not create any Romanian River articles, that would be much appreciated. Thank you for understanding. Cheers, Razorflame 19:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Razor, this edit is about as clear a violation of w:WP:OWN was I think I've ever seen on any Wiki project and another example is here. Given you appear keen to inform people you are contemplating another adminship bid soon (which may be against the spirit if not the letter of w:WP:CANVASS), it's probably not a good idea to give those who have opposed in the past any more ammunition to use against you. Regards, MindTheGap (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you used to do a lot of copyediting on the English Wikipedia, and I was hoping if you could help me copyedit the Green Day article. It could really use it, I'm trying to expand it to WP:GA status. Can you help? Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For your thousands of contributions, for your tireless work effort, and for you keeping your spirits high despite all the stressors you face on Simple. :) TBC 22:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC) |
Razor, I'm glad you decided to wait. It's just a little conflict, and not worth withdrawing. I'm also frustrated with how they cannot understand anything. I nominated you, and I know you're ready for the job. Let the RfA play out, you're ready to become one, the OWN thing is so small and not worth ending it.
To the other editors involved: you are so wrong. He is right, you do haggle over little things and not give any credit to great users who build this site. Adminship is no big deal, Razor has done so much more then I ever did. When I became one (25-0), I didn't deserve it - I had never been any kind of Sysop, knew pretty much no policies, I just had the trust of our users here. They weren't worried about little things, they cared more about the user, his contributions and usefulness of the user. Now, it's "beat down the little editor about so little things, create arguments, start conflicts, then forget about who the users is but at least we're won our argument." Thank you. — AE (talk) 22:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Razorflame,
Thank you for the welcome box on my talk page! I hope to contribute a lot to Simple English Wikipedia, and the Welcome Page will help. I am still learning how to write in Simple English. Hopefully I will perfect it soon. Thanks again!
Hello, sorry if I didn't do well for your RfA by bringing up the note you sent me. I feel kind of bad now. I know you weren't trying to bite me, I'm not that new anyway, but it did seem a bit odd at the time. I'm sorry if I damaged your chances of becoming and admin. Really. The Flying Spaghetti Monster! 21:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
See here.--TBC 22:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry RF but all of those discussions are important in the RFA. As for being available for recall, that's a given, so no additional text is needed. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
The template should be working fine (tested in User:Creol/testing1 with extra 'pre'-ed code that generated the rest of the page). Have a try and see if it helps any. -- Creol(talk) 18:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I saw :) - Done Kennedy (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
It's easy to tag vandalism and QDs here on Simple, there's not a great deal of intelligent vandalism. And no, I don't think you're ready I'm afraid. Your recent lapses in policy, stability and now popping round to a few people to say "hi" just coincidentally is all a little bit too much for me. We don't have the en-wiki questions at RFA but there still seems some doubt as to why you need the tools anyway, your quest to write 10,000 stubs on Romanian rivers doesn't require the mop at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
...review me.-- † ChristianMan16 19:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I was just nearby the screen with VF open and noticed that an IP was removing things from simple.wiki. :) Ciao, --M7 (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, right as always. You will notice they removed my support of your RFA, so the amount of bias they are getting away with is shocking. Anyway, thanks Electronixfreex (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it might be me who closes your request for adminship. This will probably happen tomororw evening or saturday morning, my time, ie. CEST.--Eptalon (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
CEST? Which time zone is that in relation to Central Standard Time? Cheers, Razorflame 18:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I've responded to your lengthy note at your RFA - hope it makes sense. Transparency is essential. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your Welcome note. :) MMXX (Talk) 08:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello Razorflame. A lot has been written about your RfA, there have also been many spiteful and poisonous comments. After the RfA is over I found one invalid vote, that of Swatjester (who had like 10 edits, done in January this year when he voted). All the other votes were valid. This leaves us with 14 support votes, and 12 oppose votes, or 53.85% support. Unfortunately this is too low for you to be promoted to adminship, the criteria talk about 65% support. Please do not take this the wrong way: The 12 people who opposed did not oppose to your editing here, you are a very welcome contributor, and you are good at what you do, editing here. These 12 people opposed because they felt you could improve your communication skills; they pointed to WP:OWN (The articles you create or contribute to are not yours, but belong to the community) and WP:BITE (be nice to other people, especially if they are new here). You yourself said that the comments you left on the talk pages of various users were misunderstood (or you did not intend them that way) - Therefore please work on your communication skills. --Eptalon (talk) 09:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
(unindenting) Thank you for the closing of my request, and yes, I knew that it would not have enough support to pass. Thanks again, Razorflame 21:46, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome Juthani1 (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, hope you don't mind. I noticed on your userpage one of the barnstars wasn't in the box. I fixed this. Although I'm not sure if it was intentionally left out of the box. So you may undo my change if required. Regards Kennedy (talk) 08:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Razorflame. I'm sorry for unsuccessfull result on your Rfa. But it's about time now for you to learn more about all mess which happened to you. And I can't really understand it why your always fail? Cause it's 9th nomination! It's really discourage to see, that's why your finally decided to go away from Simple English Wiki Simple English.
But you have huge number of edit rather than anyone into this Wikipedia, but why you? Oooh my God, I'm really sorry to you. And it's also for other people to stop showing small thing during the nomination, and it seems as a people in this Wikipedia are hate each other that's why when somebody ask for adminship became quite defficult to achieve it.
But they have to watch out the number of edit he made in this Wiki!!! To be honest, Razorflame is pretty good, but all those small thing does not matter to criticise his/her thoughts cause that thing is common into humanity. Razorflame, be patient and don't feel bad for what has happened to all that time and keep faith if there's a single day you'll be one of comm. member.
And all those people who hate you or tryieng to discourage you during the nomination, they'll fail to show up their bad intetion! Please people we have to love each other!!! Thanks and have a good day on your Wikibreak!! Cheers,--Mitaa ya Cut RekOrds (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I am just trying to reduce the amount of red colors in the list of Rivers. Good to know I am not alone. Afil (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
"that" should not appear twice: "That means that it flows... would be wrong. I don't really like the close succession of "this" and "that". Maybe "This means it flows...." could be a compromise.Afil (talk) 00:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back, Razorflame. :) You're a month late though–you said you would come back on Sept. 5. Well, at least you're around now. :) – RyanCross (talk) 01:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Nice to see you around again. :) --Isis♠(talk) 16:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry. Could you please give an example of what you are talking about? Afil (talk) 22:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Renişel River ---> Renisel River (redirecting to Renişel River).
That helpful enough? Cheers, Razorflame 22:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Just a note to say thanks, Razorflame, for your comments and vote in my RFA which closed as successful with 17 supports and no opposes. I am quite impressed with the level of support, and I promise to do my best as an administrator. Thanks again, Kennedy (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
Hello, R'flame. Could you kindly consider to write this article which based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asian ? Just to simplify it, cause I did'nt understand it very well! If you have a time to do that, please simplify that article cause I want to know more about them! But please don't stay quiet, you have to let me know if you don't have a time to write it, but I hope you do! Have a nice day....--Mitaa ya Cut RekOrds (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This article uses material from the Wikipedia Simple English article Archive 17, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki Simple English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.