no Legal Threats

Do not post legal threats on Wiki English.

It does not refer to any dispute-resolution process within Wiki English. Legal threats should be reported to Wiki: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or elsewhere to an administrator. Users who post legal threats are typically blocked while the threats are outstanding.

Instead of threats, try to use one of Wikipedia's dispute resolution procedures. If your issue involves Wikipedia itself, contact the Wiki Foundation.

That a legal dispute exists between users, whether as a result of incidents on Wikipedia or elsewhere, is not a valid reason to block, as long as no legal threats are made on Wiki English. Editors involved in a legal dispute should not edit articles about parties to the dispute, given the potential conflict of interest.

Complaints of copyright infringement is not a legal threat. If you are the owner of copyrighted material that has been added to Wikipedia, a statement about whether it is licensed for such use is welcome. You may contact the information team or the Wiki Foundation's designated agent, or use the procedures at Wiki: Copyright problems.

Defamation

A discussion as to whether material is libelous is not a legal threat. Wiki's policy on defamation is to delete libelous material as soon as it is identified. If you believe that you are the subject of a libelous statement, email the information team at info-en-qno Legal Threats wikipedia.org.

Conflict of interest

Making paid editors aware of the requirements of the Wiki Foundation's terms of use, or laws against undisclosed advertising, is not a legal threat.

Refrain from making comments that others may understand as a threat. For example, if you repeatedly assert that another editor's comments are "defamatory" or "libelous", that editor might interpret it as a threat. Instead, use less charged wording, such as "that statement about me is false and damaging, and I ask that it be corrected."

Rationale

Posting legal threats on Wikipedia is uncivil and can cause problems:

Using dispute resolution processes will often lead to a solution without resorting to the law.

The Wikipedia community has a long-standing principle that people can change: statements made in anger or misjudgment should not be held against once withdrawn.

The aim is to prevent legal threats, not to keep bad content from being fixed. Editors should encourage the aggrieved user to identify errors in the article; a link to Wiki: Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) may be appropriate.

A user threatening a legal action on their talk page have limited scope for disruption. They should not be prevented from using their talk page until attempts have been made to open a civil discussion. Persistent or vexatious complaints may still lead to a ban.

See also

Tags:

no Legal Threats What is not a legal threatno Legal Threats Perceived legal threatsno Legal Threats Rationaleno Legal Threats Conclusion of legal threatno Legal Threats

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

Janice DickinsonAaron Taylor-JohnsonJoe CockerVed (film)Pathaan (film)Tom HanksPark Eun-binEFL League TwoJake Moody2 Girls 1 CupIsraelJason Sudeikis2023 Southeast Asian GamesInternet2023 Sudan conflictArjun RampalSteven CrowderFleetwood MacKevin DurantWilliam, Prince of WalesLucian GraingeJames GunnJudy BlumeThe Green Mile (film)Evil Dead RiseEver AndersonSouth AfricaCeline DionBholaaLionel RichieShehzada (2023 film)Luke SchoonmakerBarry HumphriesLorraine NicholsonRohit SharmaBRICSCheryl HinesAadhaarDuty After SchoolJack NicholsonMary-Kate OlsenKate BeckinsaleSouth KoreaPakistanStevie NicksBonnie WrightCharles LeclercJohn LennonChris PrattNational League (division)Lou Diamond PhillipsGrace SlickMadonnaLisa Marie PresleyKatee SackhoffLarry Allen AbshierFast XDe'Aaron FoxKanye WestSteve HarveyChola dynastyJimi HendrixEmily BluntThe Evil DeadNathaniel DellDesi LydicWWE DraftEric StonestreetAmerican Civil War2023 FIBA Basketball World CupRyan MasonChinaMarlon BrandoWikipediaSai Pallavi🡆 More