This page provides guidelines for editors in applying the Wikipedia concept of notability to articles about domesticated organisms, including animal breeds, plant cultivars, and related categorizations.
The following is a draft working towards a proposal for adoption as a Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal must not be taken to represent consensus, but is still in development and under discussion, and has not yet reached the process of gathering consensus for adoption. Thus references or links to this page should not describe it as policy, guideline, nor yet even as a proposal. |
Non-notable topics should not have stand-alone articles on Wikipedia, though they may be mentioned in others (e.g., have an entry in a list article) if they are of encyclopedic interest, not indiscriminate trivia.
These guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline (WP:GNG), but are intended to provide editors with more specific criteria to help determine the notability of breeds and other named groups of domestic animals. Meeting one or more of these criteria is an indicator of likely notability but it does not automatically confer notability. Some breeds or types (particularly extinct populations) may not meet any of these criteria, yet may be notable under the GNG due to possessing reliable-source coverage that resulted from uniqueness, newsworthiness, or historic, cultural, or other value.
The notability of breeds and other groups of domesticates can be troublesome to determine, as new breeds, strains, and varietals are often created and promoted, while others may go extinct. Due to the inherent lack of mainstream media coverage of less-popular breeds, cultivars, and other classifications – especially of species that are not frequently domesticated, and even more so of breeds uncommon in the English-speaking world – there is a likelihood that some breed articles will be long-term stubs. Such under-developed articles are not ideal, but not inherently unencyclopedic, and will tend to attain more material with time, provided that their subjects are actually verifiable and notable in the first place.
A breed, in general terms, is a form of homogeneous domesticated animal or domesticated plant. It is not an exact scientific or biological term, but is a term of art in various contexts, with differing definitions. It is not the same as a species, though every breed is a subset of a species (or a hybrid between them). A cultivar is essentially a plant breed which has been formally named and classified under the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP). No comparable classification system exists for animal breeds.
For purposes of this guideline, breed is interpreted broadly and encompasses everything from loosely-defined landraces, through formally standardized animal breeds and plant cultivars, to patented genetically modified organisms and laboratory strains. Thus, the advice here covers horse types, dog breed groups, plant cultivar groups and trade designations, certain yeast strains, laboratory mice, and any other such grouping of domesticates.
When discussing plants versus animals, this page may also separately use cultivar and breed, respectively, as a shorthand for all the applicable classifications.
To qualify as notable and thus able to have a stand-alone article, a population must meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline (GNG), specifically: significant (non-trivial) coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A population will most likely need to fulfill at least one of the following criteria to meet that standard:
Recognition by such sources need not be continual or current, as notability is not temporary. However, it should not be just provisional (experimental, probationary, developmental, etc.); most attempts to establish new breeds fail. And if multiple organizations have merged one breed into another, it is likely that Wikipedia would also merge the articles on them unless article length made that impractical.
Any population can meet the general notability guideline for unusual reasons that result in non-trivial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources; this been the case with various crossbreeds that have become popular despite no recognition as breeds in their own right. Even so, it is sometimes better to merge into broader articles, especially if a stand-alone article would indefinitely remain in stub state. Various sub-populations (e.g. size or coat-color variations; cultivars that do not receive significant coverage on their own) should almost always be merged into their main articles. The same goes for essentially the same population when it is simply given different names by different organizations.
Wiki's policy on primary, secondary, and tertiary sources is important in multiple ways. Only secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject, providing in-depth coverage of the topic, can contribute to its potential notability, or be used to make assertions on Wikipedia that require any analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis (AEIS). A particular organization recognizing a breed or cultivar isn't what makes it likely to be notable; it's that good secondary sources probably exist for it by now because of that recognition. Breed standards, regulatory/legal definitions, breed registries, and scholarly works of a population-defining nature are primary sources. Many other specialist, academic, and general-interest publications constitute secondary sources. Some may still be primary if they consist mostly of opinion or new research, or they may be low-reliability tertiary sources if they simply repeat what has been published elsewhere without any new analysis or any indication what their own sources were. Tertiary sources more broadly include general encyclopedias, dictionaries, breed and cultivar lists, and online databases of organisms; these do not contribute to notability, either.
Breed registries (including kennel clubs and studbook organizations) in particular:
Other primary sources:
Dubious secondary sources:
Tertiary sources:
This section needs expansion with: Other species of animal, and something about cultivars.. You can help by adding to it. |
A dog breed, dog type, dog crossbreed, or canid hybrid is (aside from when it obviously meets the requirements of the general notability guidelines), presumptively notable if it is recognised by one or more of:
Dog crossbreeds and hybrids are usually not notable, unless subject to extensive independent coverage (e.g. Labradoodle). Non-notable crossbreeds that are verifiable and worth at least mentioning in the encyclopedia are best covered at the articles on the breeds they are derived from (or at wolf-dog or coydog in the case of hybrids).
A common cause of page mergers is when an article is created about a non-notable but verifiable variety that might be notable if it had more coverage in independent, reliable sources. Rather than lose the all information about the variety from the encyclopedia, basic information about it is likely to be merged into a list article (example: List of experimental cat breeds), or into a specific parent article (e.g., double-nosed Andean tiger hound was merged to pachón Navarro, and Iron Age pig to boar–pig hybrid).
Cultivars may also have trade designations and selling names; these are not independently notable and should redirect to the cultivar article and be mentioned there (each alternative name should be boldfaced at its first occurrence, and there is a specific template, {{Trade designation}}
, for their markup). Similarly, the same animal breed should not have multiple articles written about it just because different registries call it something different; cover in the article text any organizational differences in nomenclature and breed-standard details. In cases where some groups treat two varieties as a single breed and some treat them as a separate breeds, two articles may be viable (e.g. Estonian horse and Estonian Draft horse) or may not be (e.g. Tasman Manx cat redirects to a section at Manx cat). Apply the criteria above to each alleged breed.
However, if a page is created about a variety and the variety is already sufficiently covered at another article, deletion of the new page is the likely outcome if there's nothing important to merge from the one into the other.
For this reason, avoid splitting breed articles into new pages about sub-breeds, color or size varieties, and other trivial criteria that would result, if the separate articles were fully developed, into pages with substantially similar content. These will be re-merged. Splits are generally only justified when the focus of the new page will be on a topically distinct subject, the inclusion of which in the main article would give that subject undue weight compared to the rest of the main article's content and/or result in an overly long main article. Some examples include any notable individual animal of that breed (e.g. famous rescue dog or racehorse), a derived crossbreed or new breed with substantial mainstream coverage (e.g. Cymric cat from Manx cat), a feral population that is clearly stand-alone notable (e.g. Kiger mustang),
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Wiki:Notability (breeds), which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.