S5A-0043

I was just about to start creating the page when I discovered that the page already existed in draft form. Can you please re-consider it? Ergzay (talk) 04:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Ergzay: When I reviewed the draft at that time, there were only 3 sources. The third one was a secondary source and I took that into account for notability, but the first two are primary sources which cannot count into WP:GNG. I believe another person has added more secondary sources such that notability is demonstrated, and I would be more likely to accept it in its current state. However since I reviewed this draft already I think it's better to let another reviewer take a look. S5A-0043^Talk 05:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I see, I'm not familiar with draft review (I have the ability to publish pages myself so have never gone through the process), what's the process to get it restarted? Or is it already in queue? Ergzay (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Someone else has submitted it for review already, so yes it's already in the queue. You can continue to improve it, expand it, add more sources etc in the meantime, but if you're satisfied with the current draft then there's nothing you need to do. S5A-0043^Talk 05:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. I've already made a few edits to update it to current. Ergzay (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Well because the review took too long someone bypassed it and created the page directly and now the page history is lost. This review process really seems to be broken. Ergzay (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Well, it's a frustrating thing for us reviewers too. S5A-0043^Talk 09:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)