Mycos

There are a number of changes I would like to make, but my "reference to authority" isn't available on the web. Mycos (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Aha, I will take you up on the offer. One article I was unable to come up with much more on was Paxillus involutus, which I wanted to add material I couldn't find online - clairying taxonomic issues (what it is related to - eg different populations and P. vernalis, and anything else which may be important. Can you see anything missed in the article which could be added? I want to make it a Featured Article at some point. cheers Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure. It's late right now so I haven't gone through the Pax article with a fine-toothed comb, but what jumped out at me was the claim that Pax is "long been known" to belong to Boletacaceae. I've never heard that before. What I have seen is that Paxillus is an evolutionary link between the the all-gilled mushrooms (agarics) and all-pored boletes, which you rightly point out as being evidenced by the way that cross-walls appear so frequently near the base that the gills start to look more like pores. Modern genetic evidence reveals that this link theory to explain their presence was valid.
Further, it's my understanding that agarics, boletes and pax's are all represented by different families that reflect their different form, but that they all fall under Agaricales, and not bolete > pax with agarics as something separate. email me at < mycos at shaw dot ca > and we'll hash this out so we can avoid an edit war okay? --Mycos (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

btw. As proper titles, shouldn't "poison pax" and others names there be capitalised (eg. Poison Pax) ?

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Two years ago, you inserted references to {Kruglanski 2003, Altemeyer, 1981, 1988, 1996, 1998) [sic] into Closure (psychology), but there is no description of these titles. Could you please do the needful?

--
200.219.132.55 (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay. It appears likely that I was referring to the publication dates of papers, by Altemeyer, referenced in Kruglanski et al's - Political Conservatism As Motivated Social Cognition (Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski & Sulloway) Psychological Bulletin 2003, Vol. 129, No. 3 Specifically: Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Altemeyer (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Altemeyer (1996). The authoritarian specter. Altemeyer (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” A title that refers to the Social Dominance-Oriented personality for which Pratto is usually credited with describing as a distinct syndrome or personality type. And given the rather vague connection these titles have to the NFC, I will go in and delete the Altemeyer dates in the article itself. Thanks for raising the issue to my attention. Mycos 02:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)