Could I suggest you encapsulate this whole template with
{{#ifeq:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|Requests for adminship||...}}
so that not even the collapsed table appears in the transclusion page, seeing as none of the links work at Wiki: Requests for adminship itself. Mark Hurd (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm getting an "account expired" message when following the Summaries: "By namespace" link. NE Ent 02:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
2nd row (Analysis):
4th row (Cross-wiki):
What do we think about adding a link to the RfA vote counter? Kharkiv07Talk 02:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
At Wiki: Village pump (technical)#Analysis of edit summary usage I asked a question about how much history the analysis of edit summary usage in the context of an RfA. I am of the opinion that going back 10 or 15 years does not add useful information about a current candidate, and suggested 5 years. Someone else suggested 2 years. Whatever we decide, it appears that the link in this template is the place to make the change:
https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia/Jimbo_Wales/0/{{#time:Y-m-d|-2 years}}
So, if we make the change, what is the right number? How far back should we go to make it so the reader sees how the candidate uses edit summaries now as apposed to a decade ago? 2 years? 5 years? some other number? --Guy Macon (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
{{anontools|Jimbo Wales}}:
{{anontools|Jimbo_Wales}}:
{{anontools|127.0.0.1}}:
:::::{{anontools|127.0.0.1}}:
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Template talk:RfA toolbox, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.