This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 August 2020 and 5 September 2020.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andrew Dale24.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Primary source of full-text USMCA agreement published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative.Oceanflynn (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be any versions outside of the U.S. government's version yet. Trentonpottruff (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
"The main achievement of the Trump renegotiation of NAFTA is changing its name. The rules on trade are almost exactly the same as they were." ~Libertarian National Committee Chair Nicholas Sarwark Benjamin (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
If there is no opposition, I'll add it. Benjamin (talk) 21:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Ron Wyden has not stated opposition to the USMCA, he has only said something to the effect of not considering it before the 2018 elections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecirpcire (talk • contribs) 09:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
69.181.23.220 (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
It's clear the agreement has not entered into force, but I wonder if the text already has been finalised. The text now referred to in the external links section (]https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/united-states-mexico this US gov source] still has empty chapters in it (see eg Article 34.1). Is it possible that we are basically having an agreement of which the main negotiations have finished, but of which the text is not final yet? L.tak (talk)
The globe in the infobox does not have Hawaii or Puerto Rico colored green, despite being part of the United States. Grngu (talk) 01:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
I note Lmatt recently moved this article from "United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement" to "United States–Mexico–Canada free trade agreement". With respect, I am not sure that is appropriate. While the agreement is known in English by different names one of the official names (perhaps the most popular one) is "United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement" (ie USMCA). It is also known by many, as the "Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement" (ie CUSMA). I would suggest that the name of the article should use one of these names (as they would be the most popular). That seems to be in line with what we have done at Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
I may be wrong, but I do not think there is any such thing as "ratification" in Canada, just coming into force (defined by treaty) and implementation (up to parliament). 216.8.131.5 (talk) 14:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Just as a note, it appears the intended implementation date is June 1, 2020, though I don't know if this is official yet: [1] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
This agreement has four different names (two English, one Spanish and one French) used in the three different countries concerned. Would it not be more appropriate to include all four names in the opening definition? I appreciate that this may be a little top-heavy, but relegating the other names to a footnote seems to suggest a bias in the entry, skewed towards a US view. KitePerson (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.