unique User

--Mrs Scarborough 20:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that's right, pls discuss there. Trofobi (talk) 03:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)\
Concur with merger request, see new Talk section added at bottom, which was posted at the Wikiproject Merger Talk page. User:Leprof_7272 Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

This is an important topic, but a weak article. It spells out - accurately - the weaknesses of UU as a measure, but does not mention its strengths, when compared to even more unreliable metrics such as Page view, and provides no reference to Web analytics, which could arguably absorb both articles. I would improve it myself, but I don't have the technical knowledge ... and would probably make it worse! Heenan73 (talk) 14:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Unique user. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100911060028/http://www.webanalytics.com.br:80/Recursos/Ingles/IFABC_Web_Standards.pdf to http://www.webanalytics.com.br/Recursos/Ingles/IFABC_Web_Standards.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

What does "unique" add to the definition of a unique user? Is there a difference between a user and a unique user? Is there such a thing as a non-unique user?

Is "unique users" not a synonym of Active users, at least when defined in the way this article describes it? I recognise that unique visitors is a distinct term as visitor isn't the same as a user or a person, but what's the difference between "unique users" and Active users?

If there's none, probably would be best to remove redundant content related to Active users from this article and move it to Unique visitors. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

An alternative option would be to rewrite the article to follow the Cambridge Dictionary source recently added in Special:Diff/1182547727 and treat unique user as a synonym of unique visitor (and thus being different from Active user).

I'm mainly concerned that "unique user" doesn't have a recognised meaning that would be distinct from both "unique visitor" and "active user" and this article shouldn't hint otherwise. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)