no Child Left Behind Act
And is missing from most entries on legislation is this: WHO were the people lobbying for this legislation? It clearly wasn't the Teacher's Union.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No Child Left Behind Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
| ||
| This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
One thing that is clearly missing
So, who exactly greased the wheels for this to happen? Who were the campaign contributors to the people who introduced this legislation Thtis is not a partisan thing - it cuts both ways - and I think it would be very useful to the users of wikipedia to know this kind of stuff. Think of the recent SOPA and PIPA legislation - the people who proposed that received major contributions from Media Companies and the legislators met with lobbyists from said industries in order to craft these laws. Same thing with NCLBA. I don't have the answers or the data on this, but I think those who do and have proof in the press should be encouraged to speak up and provide the users of wikipedia a greater and more rounded understanding of exactly WHY a particular piece of legislation exists... cheers! Hwarwick (talk)(UTC) — Preceding undated comment added 15:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Legislative history
As noted above, one section that's clearly deficient is in where this legislation came from, and it bears studying. I attended a presentation by a Harvard professor years ago who explained that two different groups of academicians offered Congress competing philosophies regarding the legislative approach for NCLB. This article would have readers believing Congress created it out of their own ignorance, and that's definitely not the case. Rklawton (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DMorris1012889.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nemerson4970. Peer reviewers: Aasaro4970, Emilycs4970, Deasiacohen, Kfsimerau, Emily J. L., Trevormyrvold, Abro2.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Charles Murray citations
Seems extremely dubious to cite a eugenicist for any reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.88.151.165 (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:No Child Left Behind Act, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.