This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wiki English. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWiki: WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wiki English. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWiki: WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

have seen four major price spikes since 1990, each larger than those before. Price spikes are likely to continue unless the U.S. returns to self-sufficiency. In contrast to its liquid petroleum resources, the U.S. has substantial remaining natural gas resources. However, many of those easiest to develop lie within its Outer Continental Shelf. Development of those resources is a topic of continuing political controversy.Craig Bolon 13:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

This article deals with everything, from market demand to demographic factors, except the natural gas price itself. Quite ironic.Mazarin07 (talk) 18:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The PNG annotation says: "Y-axis: Dollars per cubic meter natural gas at Henry hub" and the plot caption says "US Dollars per MBtu". So which is it? I looked on the stated source [1] but that did not help. Can someone check this perhaps? Robbiemorrison (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

To answer my own question: 1 standard cubic foot of natural gas yields ≈ 1030 BTU (between 1010 BTU and 1070 BTU, depending on quality, when burned). But the US Department of Energy convention is to round this: one cubic foot equates to one MBtu where M indicates thousands. That still leaves a discrepancy of about 35-fold for feet to metres. Perhaps the original PNG annotation is wrong. (I am very happy I spend most of my time within the metric system.) Robbiemorrison (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

This article is seriously out of date since it does not mention fracking and the huge recent drop in natural gas prices with the enormous increase of availability of fracked natural gas.

By the way 1 m³ = 35.3146 ft³ Imersion (talk) 02:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I see lots of gases resulting from processing, but no methane, which is the main ingredient of NG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.110.172 (talk) 02:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

What is a cubic foot? How many cubic feet in a cubic body? The civilized world calculates things in cubic meters. Le Grand Bleu (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Natural gas prices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160701075547/http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1399.pdf to http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1399.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060606.RGAS06/TPStory/Business

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Natural gas prices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.nrcan.gc.ca/es/erb/CMFiles/2005_Review_and_Outlook_English206PFM-02022007-2605.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420211353/http://www.naturalgas.org/business/demand.asp to http://www.naturalgas.org/business/demand.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021010135021/http://www.naturalgas.org/business/analysis.asp to http://www.naturalgas.org/business/analysis.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218114833/http://www.naturalgas.org/overview/resources.asp to http://www.naturalgas.org/overview/resources.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927185235/http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntn12206.htm to http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntn12206.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)