Continental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co.

Continental Paper Bag Co.

v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U.S. 405 (1908), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the principle that patent holders have no obligation to use their patent.[1]

Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
Continental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
Argued April 15, 1908
Decided June 1, 1908
Full case nameContinental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
Citations210 U.S. 405 (more)
28 S. Ct. 748; 52 L. Ed. 1122; 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1519
Case history
Prior150 F. 741 (1st Cir. 1906)
Holding
It was not unreasonable for a patent owner to use existing equipment embodying old technology rather than to build new machines using new patents. Also, it was not unreasonable for the patent owner to refuse to license others to use its new patents.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · William H. Moody
Case opinions
MajorityMcKenna
DissentHarlan

Facts

Eastern Paper Bag brought an action to prevent its competitor Continental Paper Bag from using its patent for a "self-opening" paper bag. Continental Paper Bag alleged that Eastern Paper Bag was not using its patent but simply trying to suppress competition.

Decision of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court rejected this argument by Continental Paper Bag, holding that it was the essence of the patent to exclude others without question of motive.

See also

Further reading

  • Chin, Yee Wah (1997). "Unilateral Technology Suppression: Appropriate Antitrust and Patent Law Remedies" (PDF). Antitrust Law Journal. 66: 441. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2008.
  • Hovenkamp, Herbert; Janis, Mark D.; Lemley, Mark A. (2005). "Unilateral Refusals to License in the U.S". Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. Working Paper No. 303, Stanford Law School John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics. doi:10.2139/ssrn.703161.


Tags:

Continental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co. FactsContinental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co. Decision of the Supreme CourtContinental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co. Further readingContinental Paper Bag Co. V. Eastern Paper Bag Co.

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

Sarah ShahiTardigradeVal KilmerAir (2023 film)List of largest banks in the United StatesThe Guy GameDavid BowieJonathan MajorsVincent van GoghNatalia TenaSingaporeGregor MacGregorKelly Clarkson2023 Women's Premier League (cricket)Evan FergusonBlake LivelyMarylandList of highest-grossing filmsSue BirdUrfi JavedLucky HankFreddie MercuryLisa Marie PresleyKari MatchettScotlandAll About EveScream (2022 film)Scottish National PartyTed NugentBigg Boss (Malayalam season 5)Edward VIIIEmily BluntAtomic bombings of Hiroshima and NagasakiSeptember 11 attacksJulius CaesarCherRobert Downey Jr.Mahatma GandhiBRICSOrlando BloomHarry Potter2023 Africa Cup of NationsPhilippinesYouTube Premium2023 Miami OpenIdris ElbaSam BurnsThe Whale (2022 film)PolandAlexander SkarsgårdLux PascalAnsel AdamsJoe AlwynLionel MessiJim CarreyMike MaignanRRR (film)Jennifer LopezRay KrocList of Marvel Cinematic Universe filmsList of footballers with 500 or more goalsStevie NicksRaindrop cakeAngelina JolieLady GagaSpainXVideosEnumclaw horse sex caseBumpy JohnsonMidjourneyUnit 731Christina RicciMariah CareyRothschild familyKazakhstan🡆 More