articles For Deletion/Police Trainer

Police Trainer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, was unable to find any reliable sources showing notability. Was already dePRODded in 2010. Waxworker (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Being the subject of arcade games, the game really has a popularity. It fulfills the notability. Being an old article, may have been based on a reference for so long, its mention is spot on in search and other places. I have improved the article. Ontor22 (talk) 17:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  @Ontor22: - I've removed the sources you added - Hard Drive is a satire website similar to The Onion, and the article was a joke. GameFAQs is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source and unreliable per WP:VG/RS. The reliability of the Arcade Club database is unclear to me, but it isn't substantial coverage regardless. Waxworker (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment Be mindful of WP:ITSPOPULAR, understand what you mean but notability-type arguments not based on policy around WP:GNG can have issues. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Short articles in EGM2 and Retro Gamer: [1], [2], not significant coverage. --Mika1h (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]