articles For Deletion/Heights Of Vice Presidents Of The United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 22:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heights of vice presidents of the United States

Heights of vice presidents of the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List does not meet notability guidelines: see WP:NLIST. Needs to have reliable significant sources that cover the topic "Heights of vice presidents of the United States", rather than just coverage of individual's heights. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United States of America. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pure trivia. No encyclopedic merit. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Needless trivia. Ajf773 (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Needless trivia and the fact that 18 of them is not known does not help to keep this list. --Bduke (talk) 06:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Trivia. In addition, I was surprised at the comment from the nominator: "Needs to have reliable significant sources...". All the reliable sources in the world wouldn't save this from being trivial. Athel cb (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't imagine why we need stamd-alone TRIVIA articles about each physical attribute of each VP. Next it will be thumb length. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate repository of meaningless information. Jacona (talk) 14:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not every list that has gotten some mention from someone trying to fill a news quota deserves an encyclopedia entry. Half the sources here are establishing specific heights, and only one of those is for someone who was not a US president. This is a very definition of a trivial list.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unnecessary, very trivial. Also surprised that there are so many entries were the height is unknown. That is also a red flag, the inability to complete a list does not speak well for its ability to be worth keeping. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete So random! Why do we need this? Laptopinmyhands (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The WP:SNOW party has won this election in a landslide. Heights of presidential candidates have been shown to affect voters, but not those of their running mates. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per snow and trivia. Bearian (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.