Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Truth Social article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are two recent NYT's articles to add. Make an update of the title to just say Growth. The NYT's suggesting Surging Growth would be just as time-stamped:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/01/technology/truth-social-conservative-social-app.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/04/technology/truth-social-trump-indictment.html 2600:4040:2293:BC00:D49B:4DBE:5D7D:8536 (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Instead of labeling it "Alt-Tech", why not Extreme Far Right? Alt-Tech seems like a vague header. And besides breaking down the definition of Alt-Tech all you get is Alternative Tech. As if there is a non-alternative or non-derivative form of technology, to me it makes "Alt-Tech" seem appealing, and seems to be putting a positive spin on Far-Right/Nazi tech. Is a Zune considered "Alt-Tech" because it wasn't as popular as an Ipod at one point? If Instagram or Twitter only had 100k users, would that be considered "Alt-Tech", is MySpace now Alt-Tech? If determining what is alt-tech by metrics of popularity then virtually everything that is not Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Youtube, would be Alt-Tech. Twitter recently changed it's policies to allow hate speech because the new CEO is extremely far right, is it Alt-Tech now? I think the article should be changed to state something like, "Truth Social a platform popular among the Extreme Right," or "Platforms like Truth Social allow content that is seen as harmful to minorities"or Platforms like Truth Social spread unverified claims. Pretty much all social media platforms and future platforms are derivative in nature, so I think the term "alt-tech" is not helpful. 71.9.141.71 (talk) 20:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Biden re-election campaign The Biden–Harris 2024 re-election campaign created an account on Truth Social in October 2023.[231] It announced on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that it had created the account on Truth Social because it found the idea "very funny".[232] Numerous observers characterised this as an exercise by the Biden campaign in trolling Donald Trump.[233][234] Two days after the creation of the account, Axios reported that the Biden campaign's Truth Social account had more followers than that of the Trump campaign.[235]
This is blatantly a complete falsehood and an out and out lie. Truth Social----i.e. How about you actually go look on Truth Social like a genuine news source should. It will take all of 3 minutes to reveal how utterly false this is.
IT DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE A TRUMP SUPPORTER TO TELL THE TRUTH -- BEING HONEST AND FACTUAL SHOULD BE YOUR STANDARDS 2605:59C8:402C:1110:C0A3:7A6E:B77E:6010 (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Parler no longer exists it should not be listed as a current competitor 2600:8800:2598:9A00:C4C9:89DB:4D13:EF70 (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:Truth Social, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.