So, I don't know the best way to make this article up to standards.
A fact from Laboratory experiments of speciation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It seems odd having an article that is mostly table. Then again, it seems relatively frequent. I tried to give it a descent lead paragraph to put it in context. It could probably use more detail and explanation. I did find it odd using the lead to discuss aspects of the table (such as what terms mean or columns indicate), but I was not sure of a better way to do this. Thoughts? Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 10:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
In order to say that a study was important to a field, you cannot cite the study. You must find a meta-analysis or review paper that makes the claim. Abductive (reasoning) 03:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:Laboratory experiments of speciation, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.