This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was nominated at Wiki: Redirects for discussion on 13 August 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2022, when it received 16,368,401 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
| |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
|
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Asianet News, Mentioned KGF: Chapter 2 earned INR 1250 crore within 41 days and India Today which I consider more reliable mentioned INR 1232 crore in 45 day. Which one should be considered as more reliable? Grabup (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Both are reliable sources Tigerikkada (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
@Grabup, I dont think every one understand he box office statics of India, in India we have state wise box office tracker, some trackers gives collection without gst, n some others gives with gst. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerikkada (talk • contribs) 13:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The box office for the film K.G.F-Chapter 2 is 1232 Crores Ronit6969 (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
K.G.F-Chapter 2 box office is 1232 Crores worldwide. Ronit6969 (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
I think we should use MBV's numbers only when other sources aren't available. Since Asianet numbers are reliable, we should stay clear of MBV's numbers Bodi123 (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
@Grabup I mean I understand your point of view, but previous discussions on the Wikipedia Reliable Source lists Asiannet as a reliable source, and MBV's as not reliable. I believe that since for over two weeks noone other than MBV reported figures for KGF, and hence his figures were used. Besides MBV's figures have historically had discrepancy with other reported sources, including for films like Beast, RRR and Sarkari Vaari Pata as well. The Telugu and Tamil industries almost never use his figures anymore. Bodi123 (talk) 07:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Not to insult anyone and with respect, this is a totally unnecessary discussion. Because we're here arguing for nothing. Both India Today and Asianet News are same as reliable. But Asianet has an advantage over the India Today because India Today publishes the numbers from a 3rd party platform. Which is from Twitter (a social media). While Asianet published their numbers from their own work. That's why I'd say it's the better one to be in the article. Thank you. XT RedZone (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi.. It's been 2 months snd multiple sources have quoted 1250 crores. Can we now remove the lower limit now? 1) English:
2) Kannada:
3) Telugu :
Kataariveera (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
In the recently published News 18 article, there is a clear and complete breakdown of the film's closing collections, thus making it more valid. Here is the link to the article---- https://telugu.news18.com/news/movies/yash-prashanth-neel-kgf-chapter-2-total-world-wide-box-office-closing-collections-ta-1327904.html Pinging @Ab207:, @DareshMohan:, @DaxServer:, @SP013: and @Kailash29792:....please go through the article and leave your comment.....Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
When the movie is very much running in its home state, how can it be "closing collection"? Maybe they stopped collecting breakup collection after they felt the movie has reached fag end. Other reliable source ( India Today & Asianet) have provided higher figures probably because they continued tracking. So the range should be ideally ₹1240 to 1250 crores. Just because a particular media outlet gave detailed breakup and stopped later, doesn't mean we consider that as beginning point of the range. If not, let's follow the same criteria for all movies where we will consider a detailed breakup to be the point of starting range ( disregarding other articles which only mentions the figures). Kataariveera (talk) 03:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Right.Telugu run probably stopped and they stopped tracking. At that time, it was 1233 crores. Now, we have India Today saying 1240 crores & Asianet saying 1250 crores. So, can we not mention 1250 crores or if at all range is to be mentioned, we can mention 1240 to 1250 right? If not, tomorrow someone ( assume Tamil article- which stopped tracking after Tamil run) gives a detailed breakup at 1225 - should be mention range as 1225 to 1250 ? Why we need keeping going backwards to decide the starting point of the range just because it is detailed? Kataariveera (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Other Telugu media (TV9) outlet also mentions about 1241 crores. So why stick to 1233?
https://tv9telugu.com/entertainment/tollywood/kgf-chapter-2-box-office-collection-day-50-yash-film-inches-closer-to-rs-1250-crore-globally-hombale-films-tweet-au55-721195.html/amp Kataariveera (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
If the concern is about date, here is the one published on June 10 - we can go according to that since that is the latest. News 18 repor is on June 9.
https://newsable.asianetnews.com/amp/entertainment/exclusive-how-baahubali-ss-rajmouli-inspired-makers-of-kgf-chapter-2-drb-rd88y9 Kataariveera (talk) 06:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
It is still running over 400 theatres across the world, how could you ends the collection. Tigerikkada (talk) 11:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
That's exactly the point. When the movie is still running in its home states, why should we stick to a Telugu article when you have other sources mentioning both 1240 & 1250? Kataariveera (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Am observing last 15 days where Mr @Jayanthkumar123 is selectively editing and whereas he cited "news18" as a reference for kgf2 closing collection but he failed to cite same article which stated rrr closing collection is ₹1150 cr, it shows nothing but double standard guy is editing Wiki English. Wikipedia will be spoiled by such one sided editors. Tigerikkada (talk) 16:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Please clarify whether 1240 - 1250 crores can be considered or not for range? ( Since we have 2 sources with those figures). One of the reason why 1233 need not be considered is the report has closed tracking even though the movie is running in its home state. Just like how we used to update collection based on latest report, we can consider 1250 since it is as per the latest date(Jan 10). Why use range in the first place? If the reason is that it is detailed, then please note by calling it "closing/ final collection" it seems that it has stopped tracking Kataariveera (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Pinkvilla published the worldwide gross collection is 1198 crore aprrox. Khiladi King (talk) 03:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
"Wikipedia should not present a dispute as if a view held by a small minority is as significant as the majority view."-- Ab207 (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Firstpost, India TV and The Statesman published that 100 days bo was 1100 crore. Pinkvilla published as 1198 crore. While news18 published 1240 crore. Times Of India published 1250 crore. Khiladi King (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
I suggest 1250 as that is the figure cited in most sources. Here are the different sources:
Kataariveera (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
@Jayanthkumar123 - please note that I had already resolved the issue under "Box office" talk page with Ab207 & only after that edited. The mistake was probably instead of discussing here, I discussed there... Nevertheless, I had made efforts to resolve the issue Kataariveera (talk) 16:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
I feel 1250 crore can be used since at least five sources (given above) have reiterated that. Also, is there a need to give a range? I don't think we need to always give a range. Kataariveera (talk) 02:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
You won't believe that even some major sources mentioned that the film grossed only 1000 crore INR. 3 sources published that the film completed 100 days and the collection was around 1,100 CRORE+ while some, Pinkvilla and odisha tv stated as 1,200 crore. India Today stated as 1300 crore. box office estimates can't rely on only a single source. Khiladi King (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
But is there a need to use a range? Isn't 1250 reliable and sufficient? Considering there are 5 sources citing it 2 months after its usual run and the movie is still running in Bangalore theatres Kataariveera (talk) 07:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Jayanthkumar123 - please comment whether there is objection in using 1250 crores only without any range? Kataariveera (talk) 12:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
I would prefer 1200 as the base range instead of 1198. Only Pinkvilla uses 1198 that too as on Jun 23 ( and Odisha TV copies the same). So having 1200 looks more correct while giving the range. Even Indian express ( Indulge) which initially used 1198 has now updated to "more than 1200"... And there are no. of sources giving various figures upto 1250.. So I guess 1200 to 1250 while giving the estimate range would be more appropriate Kataariveera (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
There are websites which published that KGF 2 beats RRR in India Link : (https://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-kgf-chapter-2-box-office-collection-yash-film-beats-rrr-becomes-3rd-highest-grossing-indian-movie-2951579/amp) And also RRR is going to release in Japan so it may cross KGF 2 Even then, to become 3rd highest grossing Indian film worldwide.
Khiladi King (talk) 05:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
That's the reason why I was insisting on 1250 since that has been cited by 5 sources... If range is required we can go with 1230 to 1250.. Kataariveera (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Hmm..no issues from side for using 1200--1250 crore box office figures as said earlier by Kataariveera. What do you say Khiladi King?...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Ok then, 1200-1250 should be mentioned as we can't rely only only on one website. So range is better. Khiladi King (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Masum 8.29.105.78 (talk) 06:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
The following Wiki Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Box office collection Narendramodi11 (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
INR 1200 crore Narendramodi11 (talk) 07:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm Nigerian my name is abubbakar sadiq Musa I want known what is kgf??????¿?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.122.72 (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Anuappu333 (talk) 13:45, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kgf chapter 2 has grossed 1275 crore worldwide Anuappu333 (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ayush Suthar (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Worldwide grossed 1208 crore Ayush Suthar (talk) 18:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
This edit request to K.G.F: Chapter 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Yash, Srinidhi Shetty, Ananth Nag, Ramachandra Raju, Achyuth Kumar, Malavika download] MDARIFARSI (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
This topic is for editors to discuss a consensus summary of the views of critics who reviewed the movie. Let's resolve the issue here and not edit-war in the article. If you have an opinion, here is the place to share it. — Archer1234 (t·c) 16:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Here is a version that has appeared in the article:
The film received mixed reviews from critics who praised the performances, soundtrack and cinematography but criticised the screenplay and pacing.
— Archer1234 (t·c) 16:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Here is a second version that has appeared in the article:
The film received mixed to positive reviews from critics, praising the performances, cinematography, direction, music and action sequences, but the screenplay and pacing received polarizing reviews. Although, it considered to be an improvement over its predecessor.
— Archer1234 (t·c) 16:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:K.G.F (film series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article Talk:KGF: Chapter 2, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.