Beginning read-through today. Will report back soonest. Tim riley (talk) 07:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Nothing borderline about this GAN. Impressively referenced, easy to read, no discernible POV, well-illustrated, and neither too long nor too short. A few minor points before I complete the formalities:
General
Spelling – you use a mixture of ize/ization and ise/isation endings. In an English article I'd go for the latter if I were you (though I do know what Fowler said on the subject!)
Piping of "Sir" in knights' titles – inconsistent. I think Sir John Vanbrugh is much easier on the reader's eye than Sir Robert Walpole, which breaks the flow rather jarringly, but one way or the other you should be consistent.
Lead
the title Queen of France – might cause the casual reader a moment's pause: perhaps "the nominal title"?
Glorious revolution
Sarah has become "Lady Churchill" without explanation. It might be less confusing for the reader (and just as correct) if you called her Sarah Churchill at this mention.
William and Mary
"According to James…." Bit of a tease, here. Did he say whether he gave her his leave?
Reign
"Disassociated"? Strange word! Why not just "dissociated"?
Two party politics
"Unloyal"? The word is, I find, in the OED, but this is the first time I have ever met it. Wouldn't the familiar "disloyal" do?
War of the Spanish Succession
" By signing the Treaty of Utrecht…" – It isn't clear to me how the two parts of this sentence relate to each other.
Legacy
"… indicate that she chose ministers and exercised her prerogatives wisely" – I think you ought to say within your text whose judgment this is. For such a very broad claim a second source to back up Waller would be good, too.
"Chauvinist" – you mean "male-chauvinist". Ordinary chauvinism is excessive nationalism.
I should be sorry not to see this excellent article at FAC at some point. It will get my vote. A most enjoyable and impressive piece of work. — Tim riley (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
And I should have added congratulations! Tim riley (talk) 18:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Once again, thank you for the review. DrKiernan (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
This article uses material from the Wikipedia English article GA1, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license ("CC BY-SA 3.0"); additional terms may apply (view authors). Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses. ®Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wiki Foundation, Inc. Wiki English (DUHOCTRUNGQUOC.VN) is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wiki Foundation.