Polity Data Series

The Polity data series is a data series in political science research.

Along with the V-Dem Democracy indices project and Democracy Index (The Economist), Polity is among prominent datasets that measure democracy and autocracy.

Polity Data Series
Number of nations 1800–2003 scoring 8 or higher on the Polity IV scale, a measure of democracy.
Polity Data Series
World map showing findings from the Polity IV data series report for 2017.

The Polity study was initiated in the late 1960s by Ted Robert Gurr and is now continued by Monty G. Marshall, one of Gurr's students. It was sponsored by the Political Instability Task Force (PITF) until February 2020. The PITF is funded by the Central Intelligence Agency.

The data series has been criticized for its methodology, Americentrism, and connections to the CIA. Seva Gunitsky, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, stated that the data series was appropriate "for research that examines constraints on governing elites, but not for studying the expansion of suffrage over the nineteenth century".

Scoring chart

Polity Score ranges from -10 to +10
Polity score range 10 6 to 9 1 to 5 -5 to 0 -10 to -6
Regime type Full Democracy Democracy Open Anocracy Closed Anocracy Autocracy

Scores for 2018

Country Democracy score Autocracy score Polity IV score Polity IV regime type
Polity Data Series  Afghanistan 1 2 -1 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Albania 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Algeria 3 1 2 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Angola 2 4 -2 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Argentina 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Armenia 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Australia 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Austria 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Azerbaijan 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Bahrain 0 10 -10 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Bangladesh 0 6 -6 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Belarus 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Belgium 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Benin 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Bhutan 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Bolivia 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Botswana 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Brazil 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Bulgaria 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Burkina Faso 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Burundi 2 3 -1 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Cambodia 0 4 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Cameroon 1 5 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Canada 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Cape Verde 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Central African Republic 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Chad 1 3 -2 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Chile 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  China 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Colombia 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Comoros 0 3 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Congo Brazzaville 0 4 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Congo Kinshasa 1 4 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Costa Rica 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Croatia 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Cuba 1 6 -5 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Cyprus 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Czech Republic 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Denmark 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Djibouti 3 0 3 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Dominican Republic 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  East Timor 9 1 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Ecuador 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Egypt 0 4 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  El Salvador 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Equatorial Guinea 0 6 -6 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Eritrea 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Estonia 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Ethiopia 3 2 1 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Fiji 4 0 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Finland 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  France 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Gabon 4 1 3 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Gambia 4 0 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Georgia 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Germany 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Ghana 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Greece 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Guatemala 9 1 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Guinea 4 0 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Guinea-Bissau 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Guyana 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Haiti 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Honduras 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Hungary 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  India 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Indonesia 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Iran 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Iraq 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Ireland 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Israel 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Italy 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Ivory Coast 5 1 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Jamaica 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Japan 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Jordan 2 5 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Kazakhstan 0 6 -6 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Kenya 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Kosovo 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Kuwait 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Kyrgyzstan 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Laos 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Latvia 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Lebanon 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Lesotho 9 1 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Liberia 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Lithuania 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Luxembourg 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Macedonia 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Madagascar 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Malawi 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Malaysia 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Mali 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Mauritania 0 2 -2 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Mauritius 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Mexico 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Moldova 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Mongolia 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Montenegro 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Morocco 1 5 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Mozambique 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Myanmar 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Namibia 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series    Nepal 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Netherlands 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  New Zealand 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Nicaragua 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Niger 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Nigeria 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  North Korea 0 10 -10 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Norway 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Oman 0 8 -8 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Pakistan 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Panama 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Papua New Guinea 5 0 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Paraguay 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Peru 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Philippines 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Poland 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Portugal 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Qatar 0 10 -10 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Romania 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Russia 5 1 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Rwanda 0 3 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Saudi Arabia 0 10 -10 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Senegal 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Serbia 9 1 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Sierra Leone 8 1 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Singapore 2 4 -2 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Slovak Republic 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Slovenia 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Solomon Islands 9 1 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Somalia 5 0 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  South Africa 9 0 9 Democracy
Polity Data Series  South Korea 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Spain 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Sri Lanka 7 1 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Sudan 0 4 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Suriname 6 1 5 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Eswatini 0 9 -9 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Sweden 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series   Switzerland 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Syria 0 9 -9 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Taiwan 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Tajikistan 1 4 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Tanzania 4 1 3 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Thailand 0 3 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Togo 1 3 -2 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Trinidad and Tobago 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Tunisia 7 0 7 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Turkey 0 4 -4 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Turkmenistan 0 8 -8 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Uganda 1 2 -1 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Ukraine 5 1 4 Open Anocracy
Polity Data Series  United Arab Emirates 0 8 -8 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  United Kingdom 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  United States 8 0 8 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Uruguay 10 0 10 Full Democracy
Polity Data Series  Uzbekistan 0 9 -9 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Venezuela 1 4 -3 Closed Anocracy
Polity Data Series  Vietnam 0 7 -7 Autocracy
Polity Data Series  Zambia 6 0 6 Democracy
Polity Data Series  Zimbabwe 5 1 4 Open Anocracy

Criticism

The 2002 paper "Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy" claimed several problems with commonly used democracy rankings, including Polity, opining that the criteria used to determine "democracy" were misleadingly narrow.

The Polity data series has been criticized by Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting for its methodology and determination of what is and isn't a democracy. FAIR has criticized the data series for Americentrism with the United States being shown as the only democracy in the world in 1842, being given a nine out of ten during slavery, and a ten out of ten during the Jim Crow era. The organization has also been critical of the data series for ignoring European colonialism in Africa and Asia with those areas being labeled as no data before the 1960s. FAIR has also been critical of the data series' connection to the Central Intelligence Agency. Max Roser, the founder of Our World in Data, stated that Polity IV was far from perfect and was concerned at the data series' connections with the Central Intelligence Agency.

Seva Gunitsky, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, wrote in The Washington Post where he stated that "Polity IV measures might be appropriate for research that examines constraints on governing elites, but not for studying the expansion of suffrage over the nineteenth century". Gunitsky was critical of the data series for ignoring suffrage.

See also

References

Tags:

Polity Data Series Scoring chartPolity Data Series Scores for 2018Polity Data Series CriticismPolity Data Series

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

Robert KraftKnessetLuxembourgNew York CityRepublic of Ireland national football teamHong KongAlbaniaAsh ReganList of footballers with 500 or more goalsWorld War IOppenheimer (film)Yellowstone (American TV series)Melanie LynskeyMalaysia Airlines Flight 370Luther (TV series)Evan FergusonHelen HuntParineeti ChopraGeorge WashingtonPornhubBumpy JohnsonIOSRaj BabbarUEFA Euro 2024 qualifyingJustine BatemanApple Inc.List of Microsoft 365 ApplicationsWrexham A.F.C.Unit 731And Then There Were NoneBrownie (folklore)Amy Jo JohnsonKnock at the CabinSingapore2023 French pension reform strikesLionel RichieWhitney HoustonTenerife airport disasterPolandMarilyn MonroeThe Banshees of Inisherin2023 Africa Cup of Nations27 ClubDeepika PadukonePrince Harry, Duke of SussexFC BarcelonaKim MulkeyHarry PotterCharles BarkleyMount TakaheJessie Mei LiJason StathamWWE Hall of Fame (2023)Neelu Kohli2 Girls 1 CupGeorgia (country)John LennonMel GibsonAna de ArmasJared FogleMichelle YeohMillennialsAndroid (operating system)Breaking BadJulian NagelsmannMcDonald'sKim KardashianRasmus HøjlundEverything Everywhere All at OnceBukayo SakaJason David FrankAngel ReeseMoore's lawKeira Knightley🡆 More