Collins V Wilcock

Collins v Wilcock is an appellate case decided in 1984 by a divisional court of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of England and Wales.

It is concerned with trespass to the person focusing on battery.

Collins v Wilcock
Collins V Wilcock
CourtHigh Court of Justice
Decided16 April 1984
Citation(s)[1984] 1 WLR 1172; [1984] 3 All ER 374; (1984) 148 JP 692; (1984) 79 Cr App R 229; (1984) 128 Sol Jo 660; (1984) 81 LS Gaz 2140; [1984] Crim LR 481
Case history
Appealed fromMarylebone Magistrates' Court
Court membership
Judges sittingGoff LJ and Mann J

Collins v Wilcock is a leading case. Expanding on Lord John Holt's definition of intent in Cole v Turner, Lord Robert Goff's ruling in Collins v Wilcock narrowed the law. "An assault is committed when a person intentionally or recklessly harms someone indirectly. A battery is committed when a person intentionally and recklessly harms someone directly." But it also says this: "An offence of Common Assault is committed when a person either assaults another person or commits a battery." It notes that the only distinction between common assault and causing actual bodily harm (under section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861) is the degree of injury.

References

  • Dorothy J Wilson, "Divisional Court" (1984) 48 The Journal of Criminal Law 321
  • (1984) 148 The Justice of the Peace Reports 692
  • "Notes of Cases" (1984) 148 The Justice of the Peace 621 (29 September 1984)
  • (1984) 79 The Criminal Appeal Reports 229
  • "Crime" (1984) 128 The Solicitors Journal 660 (28 September 1984)
  • (1984) 81 LS Gaz 2140
  • "Queen's Bench Division" (1985) 104 Law Notes 10 (No 1, January 1985)
  • [1984] The Criminal Law Review 481
  • "Soliciting", The Police Journal, vols 58 and 59, pp 71 and 72
  • "Collins v Wilcock" in "Monthly Updater" in "Law and Practice" (1984) Legal Action [1]
  • Harvey and Marston. "Collins v Wilcock". Cases and Commentary on Tort. Sixth Edition. Oxford University Press. 2009. Pages 350 to 353. See further pages 354 to 356, 358 and 360.
  • Dias (ed). Clerk and Lindsell on Torts. Sixteenth Edition. Sweet & Maxwell. 1989. Paragraphs 17-01, 17-04, 17-05, 22-119 and 27-113.
  • Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice. 1999 Edition. Paragraphs 19-171, 19-175 and 19-271.


Tags:

🔥 Trending searches on Wiki English:

The Jinx (miniseries)Voyager 1Harry PotterNicole Mitchell (meteorologist)JapanTyler HerroIF (film)Keanu ReevesBreaking Bad2024 in filmNicola CoughlanKrushna AbhishekCzech RepublicAaron MotenWalmartJennifer PanCourteney CoxIndiaJamie DimonThe Zone of Interest (film)Amazon (company)Adrian NeweyCole PalmerLisa Marie PresleyWiki FoundationSalma HayekClinton–Lewinsky scandalMaya RudolphArgylleBacklash FranceNo Way UpJennifer LopezDaman, IndiaAustin MurphyArmeniaVoice of VietnamPhilippinesJoe AlwynMichael AvenattiCaitlyn JennerLuka DončićAnya Taylor-JoyRobert KraftBlack holePakistanList of Hindi films of 2024IlluminatiPhil FodenJoaquin PhoenixNancy Wilson (rock musician)M. Night ShyamalanKyle MacLachlanCaitlin ClarkTurkeyWalton GogginsGAZ SobolWar for the Planet of the ApesStellar BladeGeneration ZRichard Armitage (actor)Sean Foley (director)XHamsterTerry HillLeBron JamesRebel MoonApocalypse NowRonnie O'SullivanEmily BluntLovely RunnerMia KhalifaJeffrey DonaldsonDan SchneiderJimmy CarterArti SinghHyderabad Lok Sabha constituencyList of countries by GDP (nominal) per capitaOpinion polling for the 2024 Indian general electionSamuel AlitoTwitter🡆 More