Talk:Tirana

Hurgh. This seems like a bad strategy. It might be easier to start with a plain template and copy over facts, rather than trying to translate piece-by-piece. --(WT-en) Evan 15:46, 25 Jan 2004 (EST)

I completely agree. This is the English Wiki Travel, not the Romanian. Moreover, the article switches from English to Romanian and vice versa in mid-sentence! I'd translate section by section and put those here when translated. It's better to take some time translating than to put something here untranslated. (WT-en) DhDh 16:26, 25 Jan 2004 (EST)

It's probably a good principle to not put things into Wiki Travel with the intention of coming back to finish it up later. We should expect others to be able to work on it on the chance that we don't come back, or we just don't get around to it again. --(WT-en) Evan 17:52, 25 Jan 2004 (EST)

I really was amazed that this article made it into the English Wiki Travel! Even though before we used to see the Romanian Wiki Travel with articles written half in English, now we're seeing the Romanian Wiki Travel as being a source of articles for the English Wiki Travel!!! Look - I think the article should be translated because it does provide good information. But, of course, just putting Romanian text in the Tirana page is not a good move at all! (WT-en) Ronline 19:54, 25 Jan 2004 (EST)