History of Topics in Special Relativity/Lorentz transformation (trigonometric)

History of Lorentz transformation (edit)
History of Topics in Special Relativity (edit)

Lorentz transformation via trigonometric functions edit

The following general relation connects the speed of light and the relative velocity to hyperbolic and trigonometric functions, where is the rapidity in E:(3b), is equivalent to the w:Gudermannian function , and is equivalent to the Lobachevskian w:angle of parallelism :

This relation was first defined by Varićak (1910).

a) Using one obtains the relations and , and the Lorentz boost takes the form:[1]

 

 

 

 

(8a)

This Lorentz transformation was derived by Bianchi (1886) and Darboux (1891/94) while transforming pseudospherical surfaces, and by Scheffers (1899) as a special case of w:contact transformation in the plane (Laguerre geometry). In special relativity, it was first used by Plummer (1910), by Gruner (1921) while developing w:Loedel diagrams, and by w:Vladimir Karapetoff in the 1920s.

b) Using one obtains the relations and , and the Lorentz boost takes the form:[1]

 

 

 

 

(8b)

This Lorentz transformation was derived by Eisenhart (1905) while transforming pseudospherical surfaces. In special relativity it was first used by Gruner (1921) while developing w:Loedel diagrams.

Historical notation edit

Bianchi (1886) – Pseudospherical surfaces edit

w:Luigi Bianchi (1886) investigated E:Lie's transformation (1880) of pseudospherical surfaces, obtaining the result:[M 1]

.
Transformation (3) and its inverse are equivalent to trigonometric Lorentz boost (8a), and becomes Lorentz boost of velocity with .

Darboux (1891/94) – Pseudospherical surfaces edit

Similar to Bianchi (1886), w:Gaston Darboux (1891/94) showed that the E:Lie's transformation (1880) gives rise to the following relations:[M 2]

.
Equations (1) together with transformation (2) gives Lorentz boost E:(9a) in terms of null coordinates. Transformation (3) is equivalent to trigonometric Lorentz boost (8a), and becomes Lorentz boost E:(4a) with .

Scheffers (1899) – Contact transformation edit

w:Georg Scheffers (1899) synthetically determined all finite w:contact transformations preserving circles in the plane, consisting of dilatations, inversions, and the following one preserving circles and lines (compare with Laguerre inversion by E:Laguerre (1882) and Darboux (1887)):[M 3]

This is equivalent to Lorentz transformation (8a) by the identity .

Eisenhart (1905) – Pseudospherical surfaces edit

w:Luther Pfahler Eisenhart (1905) followed Bianchi (1886, 1894) and Darboux (1891/94) by writing the E:Lie's transformation (1880) of pseudospherical surfaces:[M 4]

.
Equations (1) together with transformation (2) gives Lorentz boost E:(9a) in terms of null coordinates. Transformation (3) is equivalent to Lorentz boost E:(9b) in terms of Bondi's k factor, as well as Lorentz boost E:(6f) with . Transformation (4) is equivalent to trigonometric Lorentz boost (8b), and becomes Lorentz boost E:(4b) with . Eisenhart's angle σ corresponds to ϑ of Lorentz boost E:(9d).

Varićak (1910) – Circular and Hyperbolic functions edit

Relativistic velocity in terms of trigonometric functions and its relation to hyperbolic functions was demonstrated by w:Vladimir Varićak in several papers starting from 1910, who represented the equations of special relativity on the basis of w:hyperbolic geometry in terms of Weierstrass coordinates. For instance, he showed the relation of rapidity to the w:Gudermannian function and the w:angle of parallelism:[R 1]

This is the foundation of Lorentz transformation (8a) and (8b).

Plummer (1910) – Trigonometric Lorentz boosts edit

w:Henry Crozier Keating Plummer (1910) defined the following relations[R 2]

This is equivalent to Lorentz transformation (8a).

Gruner (1921) – Trigonometric Lorentz boosts edit

In order to simplify the graphical representation of Minkowski space, w:Paul Gruner (1921) (with the aid of Josef Sauter) developed what is now called w:Loedel diagrams, using the following relations:[R 3]

This is equivalent to Lorentz transformation (8a) by the identity

In another paper Gruner used the alternative relations:[R 4]

This is equivalent to Lorentz Lorentz boost (8b) by the identity .

References edit

Historical mathematical sources edit

  1. Bianchi (1886), eq. 1 can be found on p. 226, eq. (2) on p. 240, eq. (3) on pp. 240–241, and for eq. (4) see the footnote on p. 240.
  2. Darboux (1891/94), pp. 381–382
  3. Scheffers (1899), p. 158
  4. Eisenhart (1905), p. 126
  • Bianchi, L. (1886), Lezioni di geometria differenziale, Pisa: Nistri
  • Darboux, G. (1894) [1891], Leçons sur la théorie générale des surfaces. Troisième partie, Paris: Gauthier-Villars This third part of his lectures was initially published in three steps: première fascicule (1890), deuxième fascicule (1891), and troisième fascicule (1895). The discussion of the Lie transform appears in the deuxième fascicule published in 1891.
  • Eisenhart, L. P. (1905), "Surfaces with the same Spherical Representation of their Lines of Curvature as Pseudospherical Surfaces", American Journal of Mathematics, 27 (2): 113–172, doi:10.2307/2369977
  • Scheffers, G. (1899), "Synthetische Bestimmung aller Berührungstransformationen der Kreise in der Ebene", Leipziger Math.-Phys. Berichte, 51: 145–160

Historical relativity sources edit

  1. Varićak (1910), p. 93
  2. Plummer (1910), p. 256
  3. Gruner (1921a)
  4. Gruner (1921b)
  • Gruner, P. (1921b), "Eine elementare geometrische Darstellung der Transformationsformeln der speziellen Relativitätstheorie", Physikalische Zeitschrift, 22: 384–385
  • Plummer, H.C.K. (1910), "On the Theory of Aberration and the Principle of Relativity", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 40: 252–266, Bibcode:1910MNRAS..70..252P
  • Varićak, V. (1910), "Anwendung der Lobatschefskijschen Geometrie in der Relativtheorie", Physikalische Zeitschrift, 11: 93–6

Secondary sources edit

  1. 1.0 1.1 Majerník (1986), 536–538
  • Majerník, V. (1986), "Representation of relativistic quantities by trigonometric functions", American Journal of Physics, 54 (6): 536–538, doi:10.1119/1.14557